Transcript U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs

EHP Compliance
Environmental Planning and Historic
Preservation (EHP) Compliance Workshop
1
Why is EHP Review Required?
 The National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) requires that
the Federal Government examine the proposed impacts of its actions
before project implementation
- This applies to grant-funded actions
- NEPA does not mandate preservation, only informed decisionmaking
 NEPA serves as an “umbrella regulation” and provides a process
which other EHP laws and regulations can be considered
 State processes cannot replace NEPA compliance. However,
materials prepared for state compliance can be submitted with the
EHP Review Packet for the Grant Programs Directorate (GPD)
 NEPA compliance has always been included in the special conditions
of the grant award and the grant guidance
2
EHP Compliance
What is an EHP Review?
 Analysis of pertinent project information to determine EHP
compliance
 All projects funded with Federal grant dollars must comply with EHP
laws, regulations, and Executive Orders and be certified by GPD
 Projects must receive EHP approval before initiation by GPD
 Grantees will provide all relevant EHP materials to GPD via the
Centralized Scheduling and Information Desk - [email protected]
 Grant funds may be used for preparation of EHP documentation
3
EHP Compliance
What are EHP Considerations?
 Endangered Species
 Cultural Resources
–Historic properties
–Archaeological sites
 Air and Water Quality
 Noise
 Fish and Wildlife (including
habitat)
 Floodplains
 Environmental Justice
 Wetlands
 Socioeconomic Resources
 Coastal Zones
 Land Use
 Agricultural Lands
 Hazardous Materials
 Traffic
 Geology (Topography, Soils)
4
EHP Compliance
Completing the GPD EHP Screening Form:
Use and Instructions
 Who needs to complete the form?
 What information is needed in order to complete the form?
 How much information is provided?
 Where is the information included on the form?
 When is the form submitted?
5
EHP Compliance
Case Study #1
Union Station, Washington, DC
6
EHP Compliance
EHP Review Packet
 Detailed project description
 Physical address of structure/facility or lat/long
 Clear color photographs (ground-level and aerial)
 Dimensions/acreage/square footage of structure and/or land affected
7
EHP Compliance
EHP Review Packet (continued)
 Extent and depth of ground disturbance for:
- New construction and structure modification
- Utility line placement
- Fencing, light posts, installations, etc.
 Height of communication towers
- Explain the change in the overall height of the tower (if installation of
antennas or communication equipment results in an increase in tower height)
 Special equipment being used, staging areas, etc.
 Year building or structure was built (to include buildings or structures that
are in the vicinity)
8
EHP Compliance
GPD EHP Screening Form:
What Information is Needed?
A. PROJECT INFORMATION
Grant Program Name: _______________________________
DHS Grant Award Number: __________________________
Project Name: ___________________________
Grant Fiscal Year: ___________ (Provide if no award number is available)
9
EHP Compliance
GPD EHP Screening Form:
What Information is Needed?
A. PROJECT INFORMATION
Grant Program Name: Transit Security Grant Program (TSGP)
DHS Grant Award Number: 2008-AB-C1-2345
Project Name: Physical Security Enhancements at Union Station,
Washington, DC
Grant Fiscal Year: _____ (Provide if no award number is available)
10
EHP Compliance
A. PROJECT INFORMATION (continued)
Project Type (Check all that apply):
X Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing, cameras, TWIC
readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray machines, lighting, etc.)
 New installation/construction/renovation (i.e., emergency operations
centers, docks, piers, security guard buildings, etc.)
X Renovations/upgrades/modifications to structures 50 years old or older
 Communication towers, related equipment, and equipment shelters
 Other ground disturbing activities (i.e., trenching, excavation, etc.)
 Training and exercises (specify whether classroom-based or field-based;
field-based only require further information below) _____
Purchase of equipment (specify type, and whether mobile/ portable, or
installation will be required) _______
Other (specify) ______________________________________________
11
EHP Compliance
A. PROJECT INFORMATION (Continued)
Grantee Name: __________ Sub grantee Name: _________
State: ____ County: ___________ City: ________________
Agency: ______________________
Dollar value of grant (optional): _______
12
EHP Compliance
A. PROJECT INFORMATION (Continued)
Grantee Name: National Railroad Passenger Corporation
(Amtrak)
State: DC
County: Washington
City: Washington
Agency: Amtrak
Dollar value of grant (optional):
13
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION
Enter Project Description:
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________
The project description should contain a brief summary of what specific
action is proposed, where it is proposed, and how it will be implemented.
14
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION
Enter Project Description:
Physical security enhancements for Union Station, Washington DC.
Installation of three (3) panoramic cameras on the north side of the main
hall and six (6) panoramic cameras around the perimeter of the rail yard.
The cameras will be installed on existing poles and the parking garage;
therefore, no ground disturbance would be required. Photographs are
attached.
In addition, bollards will be installed in front of the station, requiring
ground disturbance of approximately 200’ x 3’, at a depth of 12 - 16
inches. These will be crash-rated steel vehicle bollards, measuring
approximately 36” in height, replacing current vehicle intrusion barriers.
(NOTE: If one project qualifies as multiple project types, then note and refer back to
original entry.)
15
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
 Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.)
Project Location (physical project address or latitude/longitude of project
location): _______________________________________________
Year existing building(s) or structure(s) involved in the proposed project
was built (Required): __________
Color site photos attached (Required)
Ground-level site photos (showing where installations are
proposed):
___ Yes ___ No
Aerial photograph with project limits outlined and with the location
of any proposed installations identified (refer to Appendix A for
guidance):
___Yes ___ No
16
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
X Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.)
Project Location (physical project address or latitude/longitude of project
location): 50 Massachusetts Ave, NE, Washington, DC 20002
Year existing building(s) or structure(s) involved in the proposed project
was built (Required): 1908
Color site photos attached (Required)
Ground-level site photos (showing where installations are
proposed):
X Yes ___ No
Aerial photograph with project limits outlined and with the location
of any proposed installations identified (refer to Appendix A for
guidance):
X Yes ___ No
17
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
 Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
Will ground disturbance be required?
__ Yes (provide total extent (depth, length, and width) ___ No
Has the ground been previously disturbed? (continued) ___ Yes ___ No
If yes, please describe the current disturbed condition of the area (i.e.,
parking lot, commercial development, etc.): _____
If no, include other visual documentation (see Appendix B for a list of online
mapping resources): (See next slide)
18
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
X Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
Will ground disturbance be required?
X Yes (provide total extent (depth, length, and width) 200’x3’x12” ___ No
Has the ground been previously disturbed? (continued) X Yes ___ No
If yes, please describe the current disturbed condition of the area (i.e.,
parking lot, commercial development, etc.): Paved driveway/road going
past the front of the station
If no, include other visual documentation (see Appendix B for a list
of online mapping resources): (See next slide)
19
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
 Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
If no, include other visual documentation (see Appendix B for a list of
online mapping resources):
Technical drawings/site plans (if available) ___ Yes ___ No
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), with project
limits outlined ___ Yes ___ No
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) Map, with project limits outlined ___ Yes ___ No
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey Map,
with project limits outlined ___Yes ___ No
20
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
X Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
If no, include other visual documentation (see Appendix B for a list of
online mapping resources):
Technical drawings/site plans (if available) ___ Yes X No
FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), with project
limits outlined X Yes ___ No
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory
(NWI) Map, with project limits outlined X Yes ___ No
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Survey Map,
with project limits outlined ___Yes X No
21
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
 Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
Will any equipment or structures need to be installed? ___ Yes ___ No
If yes, please explain how and where this installation is proposed to
be done (include site-specific photographs, and attach additional
pages, if needed): ___________________________________
Will the equipment use the existing infrastructure for electrical
distribution systems? ___ Yes ___ No
22
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
X Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
Will any equipment or structures need to be installed? X Yes ___ No
If yes, please explain how and where this installation is proposed to be
done (include site-specific photographs, and attach additional pages, if
needed): Three (3) interior cameras will be mounted under an overhang
in the main hall. Six (6) exterior cameras will be hung from existing poles
or structures, such as the parking garage.
Will the equipment use the existing infrastructure for electrical
distribution systems? X Yes ___ No
23
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
 Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
Are there any known structures or buildings that are 50 years old or older in
the project area or immediate vicinity? (If yes, please provide the location
of the structure(s), ground-level color photos of these structures, and
identify their location(s) on the aerial map; see Appendix B for the web
address of the National Register of Historic Places) ___ Yes ___ No
Is there any previously completed environmental documentation for this
project (i.e., environmental assessment, wetland delineation,
archaeological study)? ___ Yes (please attach documentation) ___ No
Is there any previously completed agency coordination for this project (i.e.,
correspondence with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State Historic
Preservation Office, Tribal Historic Preservation Office)?
___ Yes (please attach documentation) ___ No
24
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
X Physical security enhancements (i.e., installation of fencing,
cameras, TWIC readers, bollards, motion detection systems, x-ray
machines, lighting, etc.) (continued)
Are there any known structures or buildings that are 50 years old or older in
the project area or immediate vicinity? (If yes, please provide the location
of the structure(s), ground-level color photos of these structures, and
identify their location(s) on the aerial map; see Appendix B for the web
address of the National Register of Historic Places) X Yes ___ No
Is there any previously completed environmental documentation for this
project (i.e., environmental assessment, wetland delineation,
archaeological study)? ___ Yes (please attach documentation) X No
Is there any previously completed agency coordination for this project (i.e.,
correspondence with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, State Historic
Preservation Office, Tribal Historic Preservation Office)?
___ Yes (please attach documentation) X No
25
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
 Renovations/upgrades/modifications to structures 50 years old or
older
Is the building or structure listed in the National Register of Historic Places,
or has it previously been determined eligible for listing in the National
Register of Historic Places? (See Appendix B for the web address of the
National Register of Historic Places) ___ Yes ___ No ___ Unknown
Project Location (physical project address or latitude/longitude of project
location): _______________________________________________
Year existing building(s) or structure(s) involved in the proposed project
was built (Required): __________
26
EHP Compliance
B: PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION (Cont’d)
X Renovations/upgrades/modifications to structures 50 years old or
older Please see Physical Security Enhancements section
Is the building or structure listed in the National Register of Historic Places,
or has it previously been determined eligible for listing in the National
Register of Historic Places? (See Appendix B for the web address of the
National Register of Historic Places) X Yes ___ No ___ Unknown
Project Location (physical project address or latitude/longitude of project
location): _______________________________________________
Year existing building(s) or structure(s) involved in the proposed project
was built (Required): __________
27
C: CONSIDERATION OF RESOURCE IMPACTS
 Section C is not required for the following:
- Purchase of mobile and portable equipment
- Classroom-based training, or field exercises to be conducted at
an existing facility having established procedures for that
particular proposed exercise
 Table Overview
- Complete each of the rows and columns of the table as they
pertain to the proposed project
- Provide responses based on the latest planning and background
information
28
Ground-Level Photographs
 Ground-level photographs should show the installation location and
context
 Copy the image, and paste it into Microsoft Paint, Microsoft Power
Point, or graphics software
 Using the tools such as line drawing and fill colors, label exactly
where project features will take place
 Cut and paste completed drawing into Word document and include
explanatory text
29
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground Level Photograph #1 - Rail Yard Camera
Location (facing south) – Original
30
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground Level Photograph #1 - Rail Yard Camera
Location (facing south) – Label Camera Locations
31
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground Level Photograph #2 - Rail Yard Camera
Locations (facing north) – Original
32
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground Level Photograph #2 - Rail Yard Camera
Locations (facing north) – Label Camera Locations
33
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground Level Photograph #3
Proposed Main Hall Camera Locations - Original
34
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground-Level Photograph #3 – Proposed Main Hall
Camera Locations – Label Camera Locations
35
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground Level Photograph #4 –
Proposed Bollard Locations - Original
Temporary Bollards (already in place)
36
Scenario 1: Union Station
Ground Level Photograph #4 –
Proposed Bollard Locations – Label Bollard Locations
37
Aerial Photographs
 Obtain an aerial photo
- There are multiple online sources for aerial photos
- Some are free sources, others request a nominal fee
 Copy the image, and paste it into Microsoft Paint, Microsoft Power
Point, or graphics software
 Using the tools such as line drawing and fill colors, label exactly
where project features will take place
 Cut and paste completed drawing into Word document and include
explanatory text
38
Scenario 1: Union Station Aerial Photograph
Original
39
Scenario 1: Union Station Aerial Photograph
Final Submittal
40
Topographic Maps
 Topographic maps (“topo maps”) are created by the United States
Geological Survey (USGS) and provide in-depth detail of surface
features of the United States
 Obtain a topo map
- There are multiple online sources for topo map
- Some are free sources, others request a nominal fee
 Copy the image, and paste it into Microsoft Paint, Microsoft Power
Point, or graphics software
 Using tools such as line drawing and fill colors, label exactly where
project features are proposed
 Cut and paste completed drawing into the Word document and
include explanatory text
41
Scenario 1: Union Station Topographic Map Original
42
Scenario 1: Union Station Topographic Map –
Identified and Labeled
43
Floodplain Maps
 FEMA maintains an online database of floodplain maps, referred to
as FIRMs (Flood Insurance Rate Maps)
 FEMA has smaller maps, FIRMettes, available to download for free
 Go to www.msc.fema.gov, and enter your project location into
“Product Search”, on the top left portion of the screen
- Select the “View” icon for the resulting map
- Select “Make a FIRMette”, and follow instructions to generate the
FIRMette for your project area
44
Floodplain Maps (continued)
 Copy the image, and paste it into Microsoft Paint, Microsoft Power
Point, or graphics software
 Using tools such as line drawing and fill colors, label exactly where
project features are proposed
 Cut and paste completed drawing into the Word document and
include explanatory text
45
Scenario 1: Union Station Floodplain Map –
Original
46
Scenario 1: Union Station Floodplain Map –
Identified and Labeled
47
Wetlands Maps
 The US Fish and Wildlife Service created the National Wetlands
Inventory (NWI) to assist with management, research, and planning
- NWI maps are available online for free download at
www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html
- NWI wetlands data is not comprehensive, but is a good starting point
 Select the region you wish to view on the reference map, then select
the “Locate” tab on the resulting map to zoom in to your project area
 Select “Print PDF” to create your map
48
Wetlands Maps (continued)
 Copy the image, and paste it into Microsoft Paint, Microsoft Power
Point, or graphics software
 Using tools such as line drawing and fill colors, label exactly where
project features are proposed
 Cut and paste completed drawing into Word document and include
explanatory text
49
Scenario 1: Union Station Wetlands Map –
Original
50
Scenario 1: Union Station Wetlands Map –
Identified and Labeled
51
EHP Compliance
Projects Affecting Historic Properties
 Buildings and structures 50 years old or older may be listed on, or
eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places
 The State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) should be consulted
on projects that may impact listed or eligible properties, including
archaeological resources (Federal agency responsibility)
 An individual who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional
Qualification Standards must be used when determining the effects of
a project on a historic property
52
EHP Compliance
Programmatic Environmental Assessment
 GPD has developed a Programmatic Environmental Assessment
(PEA) to examine the impacts of all its grant-funded projects
 The PEA determined that certain types of projects would not have
any impact on the environment
- This includes, but is not limited to, PPE, medical supplies and limited
pharmaceuticals, mobile and portable decontamination equipment,
mobile and portable detection equipment, mobile and portable power
equipment, and mobile and portable interoperable communications
equipment
 The PEA also defined those projects that would require further, caseby-case study
53
EHP Compliance
Tips for a Timely EHP Review
 Include clear color photos of where the actual equipment will be
located
 Include any previous environmental documentation completed for the
site with the EHP review packet
 Be sure to answer the questions what work is being proposed, where
will it take place, and how will it be carried out?
 Look at AEL and PEA to assist in identifying projects that need EHP
review
54
Frequently Asked Questions
 What do you mean by “date of construction”?
 Why do you need to know what is in the vicinity of my project?
 Where can I find my grant number?
 What do you mean by “total extent of ground disturbance”?
 What do you mean by “label photographs”?
55
EHP Compliance
EHP Points of Contact
Name
Adria Martínez
Contact Information
[email protected]
202-286-2566
Marquietta Davis
[email protected]
Brian Krevor
[email protected]
Amanda Pereira
[email protected]
Marshall Popkin
[email protected]
Centralized Scheduling
and Information Desk
[email protected]
GPD EHP Information
[email protected]
800-368-6498
56
Questions?