Transcript Document

Portfolio
InterOperability
Project
Simon Grant
JISC CETIS & independent
Portfolio Interoperability SIG meeting
Manchester 2008-09-30
Origins

From some time back, a spec was wanted that was




CETIS Portfolio SIG meeting, December 2006
Generated considerable discussion


simpler
easier to implement
but not a great deal of practical action
Continued pressure to do something practical
2
PIOP – from December 2007


“Portfolio InterOperability Prototyping”
Three teams in particular had a long history of tools,
interoperability work, trials, collaboration







Pebble Learning (PebblePad)
University of Nottingham (Passportfolio etc.)
Newcastle University (ePET)
They offered to serve as pioneers, to do the first prototype
Important to start with fewest partners
A little JISC funding was found as sweetener
http://wiki.cetis.ac.uk/Portfolio_interoperability_prototyping
3
PIOP project achievements

Agreed LEAP2A




based on their own real requirements and experience
Export fairly straightforward
Import more of a challenge, as expected, but real
progress has been made
Let them speak for themselves...
4
Now the extension project

Lisa Gray to introduce from JISC point of view
5
Introduction to the call

Paragraphs 10 to 15 mirror paragraph 19, deliverables










test account
scenarios
mapping table
glossary
implement, document and report success of import
implement and document export
report on experiences
Original partners to help new ones and explore further
LEAP2A needs further development
Now is your chance to get your requirements covered
6
Selection criteria

“develop or adapt an




Having more users is better


prospect of real benefit for more learners
Giving more coverage of LEAP2A is better



operational system,
whether commercial or free / open source, for which
there is substantial capability for interoperability”
more benefit for each learner
better for testing, developing, extending
JISC project tie-in is good

but other systems also very welcome
7
Pre-commissioning by Oct 10th




Description of system
IP situation (to verify ability to develop and exploit)
Information in the system available for export
Scenarios envisaged (in outline)





interoperation
practice
Numbers of learners using system
Who will do the development
Who will allocate their time
8
Then?




We will choose the most suitable for funding (20th Oct)
Work to be carried out November 2008 to March 2009
Projects will need to keep in close touch with us
(CETIS), each other, and the original partners
Not funded?




very welcome to tread the same path, but without the obligations
find someone funded who has the closest system
make a case for JISC to provide further funding later
We look forward to working with you
9