Transcript 슬라이드 1
Design for Manufacture & DFX Park, Mok-Min 2004, 05, 10 MAI Lab. Seminar Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: concepts, applications, and perspectives Computers & Industrial Engineering 41 (2001) 241-260 Tsai-C. Kuo, Samuel H. Huang, Hong-C. Zhang Dept. of IE and Mgt, Minghsin Institute of Technology, Hsinchu, Taiwan, ROC Dept. of ME, IE, and NE, Univ. of Cincinnati, USA Dept. of IE, Texas Tech Univ., USA Historical background Engineering design 원하는 요구를 만족시키기 위하여 시스템, 컴포넌트나 프로 세스를 개발하는 일련의 과정 Two approaches: after a design is completed Value Engineering (VE): 제품의 기능과 가격을 고려 Producibility Engineering (PE): 가용한 기술과 툴을 이용하 여 적절한 비용으로 생산 Limits of VE & PE 제품의 제조 가능성을 초과하는 최적해 VE는 과학적인 접근보다는 회사의 정책에 연관 디자인이 결정되면 대부분의 비용이 이미 결정 1/20 Design for Assembly (DFA) Boothroyd & Dewhurst(1987)’s DFA method Two factors 기본적인 기준을 이용하여 각 부품이 왜 필요하고 다른 부품과 합 쳐져야 하는지에 대해서 자문 특별히 구축한 DB의 실시간 표준을 이용하여 조립 시간을 개산 Design efficiency는 실제 조립 시간과의 비교를 통하여 구함 제조나 품질에서 문제를 일으킬 수 있는 assembly difficulty를 파 악 The total number of parts The ease of handling, insertion, and fastening of the part Applications Hitachi: Assembly Evaluation Method (AEM) Sony: Design for Assembly Cost effectiveness (DAC) GE: manufacturing producibility handbook, workshops DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 2/20 Design for Manufacture (DFM) Processes for the manufacture of a particular part 표준 컴포넌트 사용 범용 부품 설계 조립 방위 최소화 Stoll(1988) cited a checklists of DFM guidelines Many DFM studies have been completed 원자재 선택 프로세스 선택 모듈 디자인 개발 Machining parts (Booth & Radovanovic, 1989) injection molding (Dewhurst, 1987) sheet metal stamping (Zenger & Dewhurst, 1988) die cast parts (Dewhurst & Blum, 1989) DFM applications can be carried out with great efficiency via a CAD/CAM system DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 3/20 Design for disassembly (DFD) Two basic methods of disassembly (Leonard, 1991) Some obstacles (Seliger, Zussman & Kriwet, 1993) reverse assembly, brute force Difficult to gain all the information Parts might have been modified during repair Wear can make joined elements Determination of disassembly sequence Dewhurst(1991) Gu and Yan(1995): a graph-based heuristic approach Etc. DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 4/20 Design for recyclability (DFR) Environmental conscious increases The aim of recycling Maximize the recycling resources Minimize the mass and pollution potential of remaining products DFM of plastics that can be easily recycled Dismantling techniques and recycling costs DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 5/20 Design for environment (DFE) Three main goals of DFE (Hovath, et al. , 1995) Minimize the use of non-renewable resources Effectively manage renewable resources Minimize toxic release to the environment HP provides DFE tools (Korpalski, 1996) DFE guidelines Product assessments Product stewardship metrics DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 6/20 Design for life-cycle (DELC) Life-cycle phase Need Design Product life-cycle cost (Jovane, 1993) Company costs User costs Society cost market recognition development Production materials, energy, facilities, wages, and salaries Distribution transportation, storage, waste transportation, storage Waste, pollution, packing, health damages warranty service energy, materials, maintenance Waste, pollution, health damages Disposal disposal dues Waste, pollution, disposal, health damages Recycling recycling dues Waste, pollution, health damages Use Waste, pollution, health damages DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 7/20 Design for quality (DFQ) The objectives of DFQ (Crow, 1983) Meet customer requirements Robust product Continuously improve product reliability, performance, and technology Methods of DFQ Taguchi method(1986) Quality Function Deployment (QFD) Benchmarking DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 8/20 Design for maintainability (DFMt) Maintainability is (Kapur & Lamberson, 1977) Objective of DFMt The probability that a failed system can be repaired in a specific interval of downtime The product can maintained throughout its useful life-cycle at reasonable expense without any difficulty Maintainability design guidelines 접근성 고장의 확인 교체 부품의 교체 부품의 교체 부품의 및 격리 능력 비중 한계 운반 가능성을 고려한 크기 한계 자동(원격) 교체 가능성 DFA DFM DFD DFR DFE DFLC DFQ DFMt 9/20 Summary 여러 측면에서의 설계 목적과 제약 사항들을 사전에 고려하여 더 나은 제품을 설계 DFMA를 통해서 낮은 비용으로 용이한 제품 생산 DFD, DFR, DFLC를 통해서 제품의 수명 주기 후에 처리를 용이 DFE를 통해서 환경적인 안전과 건강과 관련된 문제 들을 해결하고 간접적인 비용을 절감 DFQ, DFMt를 통해서 검사, 재작업, 진단에 소요되 는 비용을 절감 10/20 Future trends Integration issues in DFX Human factors engineering in DFX Systematic identification of user’s life-cycle requirements Methods to represent, store, and retrieve design alternatives Comprehensive measure of goodness of a design Workplace design, human-equipment interface, training program Intelligent DFX systems 필요한 경험을 쌓는 데 많은 시간이 소요 Knowledge-based system을 이용하여 design feature 간의 관 계를 이해하는 데 도움을 줄 수 있다. 11/20 Productivity evaluation method and design for manufacturability JSAE Review 16 (1995) 375-381 Hiroshi Onitsuka, Kaoru Eguchi, Naoaki Miura, Hiroatsu Matsumura Powertrain Prototype Engineering Department, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Kanagawa, Japan Introduction Nissan에서 미국 시장을 겨냥하여 개발한 VQ engine에 적용된 방법론 높은 품질과 낮은 비용이 목적 엔진 조립 공정의 70%가 자동화 12/20 Productivity evaluation method The degree of progress achieved in design for manufacturability The evaluation method provides an index of how difficult a part would be to build, or the poorness of its workability Stabilize production quality and achieve low cost level 13/20 Assembly productivity evaluation method Standard time Difficult operation time Most fundamental work aspects of an element 부품을 줄이는 것으로 향상 가능 Additional time spent when the construction of a part requires extra work 제거 가능한 다양한 방식의 작업이 존재 어떤 부품이 생산성 증가를 위하여 개선 가능한 지를 알려줌 Std time/dif oper time 중 어느 것이 효과적인 지 알려줌 제품 개발 초기 단계에 전체 line cycle time에 대한 추정 14/20 Maching productivity evaluation method Cost of facilities와 cost of the tools로 평가 예를 들어, 가공해야 할 hole의 수가 많으면, standard operation score가 높다. Hole들이 가까이 있는 경우에는 multi-axis head를 사용할 수 없기 때문에 difficult operation score가 높다. 15/20 Design for global manufacturing and assembly (DFGMA) IIE Transactions 29 (1997) 585-597 G. Don Taylor Dept. of IE, Bell Engineering Center, Univ. of Arkansas, USA Introduction Dowlatshahi(1992) reports The design phase is responsible for only 5% of product cost But, it can determined 75% of the manufacturing cost and 80% of product quality performance General DFX strategies are difficult to manage in multi-facility, global settings 16/20 Mathematical formulation Manufacturing cost CM ijklm CPijklm CDijklm CLijklm CI ijklm manufacturing= process + design + logistics + inventory 17/20 General DFGMA model Objective function: min : CM Ijklm X Ijklm j k l m CS CT Y ' CC j j j k k k l Ijk l manufacturing cost Y Ijkl Ijkl set-up cost Ijk tooling cost jkl Z jkl i : product I j : process j (1:automated, little flexible, 2: flexible) k : site k (Europe, Asia, North America) l : period l (3 quarter period) m : demand location capital procurement cost 18/20 General DFGMA model constraints X j k l Ijklm Dlm l I 1 Cijkl ( X ijklm) CIjkl ( X ijklm) Ajkl i 1 m m Ajk 0 1 Ajkl Ajk,l 1 A' jkl (Z jkl ) X X m l Ijklm Ijkl [M ](YIjkl ) Ajkl 0 X Ijklm 0, int YIjkl 0,1, int Y 'Ijk 0,1, int Z jkl 0,1, int [M ](Y 'Ijk ) i : product I j : process j (1:automated, little flexible, 2: flexible) k : site k (Europe, Asia, North America) l : period l (3 quarter period) m : demand location 19/20 simulation 20/20