Transcript Slide 1
Towards Romania of 2022 PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The social and macroeconomic policy of Europe is the policy of Romania The EU projects represents a priority The European guidelines and strategies have to be adapted to national context The national potential and opportunities should be used well and efficient Set up a large and efficient partnership – at national and regional level; strengthen the communication between national and regional/ local level PRINCIPLES OF PROGRAMMING The public expenditure will be concentrated on long term structural reform and investments targeted to sustainable growth and jobs creation Maximization of results by attracting private resources and alternative financial mechanisms; strong international partnership and cooperation with IFIs Use the lessons learnt from 2007-2013 period Strengthen the management capacity in both public and private sector Strengthen the national coordination; ensure a sound financial management, a transparent system and respect of the public procurement legislation Key European commitments, policies, strategies Common Agricultural Policy Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) and TEN policy LIFE programme Common Fisheries Policy Europe 2020 commitments ERASMUS for ALL Other Sectorial Directives and Guidelines Horizon 2020&COSME Strategy for Danube region National commitments, policies, strategies National Reform Programme 2014-2016 National Roma Strategy National Transport Master-plan National Strategy for healthcare system National research and innovation strategy National Development Strategy Strategy for Employment, including special approach for young people National strategy for preventing drought risk National strategy for poverty reduction Strategy for preventing early school leaving 8 Regional Development Strategies KEY ACTIONS FOR AN EFFICIENT PROGRAMMING Thorough analysis of the current socio-economic situation and spotting the main challenges Implication of all stakeholders involved in the implementation of the current programming period in designing the future financing scheme Concentration on a minimum set of priorities Use of the most appropriate technical assistance, including results of the evaluations Designing the National Reforme Programme and the Partnership Agreement in a coordinated manner MAIN CHALLENGES KEY PRIORITIES FOR PUBLIC INVESTMENTS Lack of an integrated approach of a strategic development of a territorial area Low level of productivity and poor access to financing Weak transport infrastructure Huge effects of natural disasters (floods, drought, snowing) Insufficient specialisation on the competitive advantages Inefficient investments in research and innovation Low efficiency in using energy resources Need to comply with the environmental acquis Uneven access to social assistance and many vulnerable groups Significant impact of the economic crisis on the labour market High incidence of poverty Increased rate of early school leaving phenomenon Inefficient health services Inefficient public administration KEY PRIORITIES FOR PUBLIC INVESTMENTS Use extensively the integrated approach at territorial level Improve the economic competitiveness and the business environment Investments in transport infrastructure Reduce the impact of natural disasters Reduce poverty Ensure a better access to basic infrastructure Ensure long term employment Increase the efficiency in using energy resources Improve access to health services and other social services Increase the capacity of public administration to deliver NEXT STEPS Elaboration of socio-economic and development disparities analysis September - December 2012 Identification of development needs and the strategic priorities of development December – January 2012 Drafting the first draft of Partnership Agreement December 2012 Establishing the list of Operational Programmes and designation of the managing bodies January 2013 Drafting the first draft of the Operational Programmes January – June 2013 NEXT STEPS Informal/official negotiations with European Commission on finalizing the programming documents During the year 2013 Continuous activities during the programming process and institutional preparation Ex-ante evaluation Partnership consultations Dissemination of information/public debates TOUGH LESSONS LEARNT BETTER PROGRAMMING AND RESULTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION