Transcript Senate Bill 191 & Teacher Evaluation

Woodland Park School District
Educator Effectiveness 101
August 2014
CDE Vision
All students in Colorado will
become educated and
productive citizens capable of
succeeding in a globally
competitive workforce.
WPSD Ends Statement
The WPSD exists so that
students develop their
foundation to thrive as
citizens in the 21st century.
Students
Successful students
Educators
Great teachers and leaders
Schools/
Districts
Outstanding schools and districts
State
Prepare students to thrive in their education and in a globally competitive
workforce.
Ensure effective educators for every student and effective leaders
for every school and district.
Build the capacity of schools and districts to meet the needs of
Colorado students and their families.
Best education system in the nation
Build the best education system in the nation.
3
Key Colorado Legislation
What do we want students/educators/
schools/districts to know & be able to do?
How will we know if
expectations are met?
How will we respond
when help is needed?
Standards
Assessments
School Readiness
Workforce Readiness
•
•
•
•
RTI
PBSI
Targeted interventions
IEPs
Students
Colorado Academic
Standards CAP4K
(SB 08-212)
Educators
Educator Quality
Standards Educator
Effectiveness
(SB 10-191)
Educator evaluations
• Induction
• Mentoring
• Professional development
plans
• Remediation plans
Schools/
Districts
Performance
Indicators Education
Accountability Act
(SB 09-163)
School and district
performance
frameworks
• Unified planning
• Priority
• Turnaround
Senate Bill 10-191: The Big Picture
• Statewide definition of effectiveness
• Requires annual evaluations
• Non-probationary status earned based upon 3 consecutive
years of demonstrated effectiveness
• Non-probationary status may be lost based upon consecutive
years of ineffectiveness
Teacher Framework Requirements
Evaluation
Rubric,
Observations,
Surveys &
Artifacts
50%
Professional
Practice
50%
Student
Academic
Growth
State & District
assessments;
Other assessments
measuring student
achievement and
growth
Final Rating
•
•
•
•
Highly Effective
Effective
Partially Effective
Ineffective
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE
Teacher Evaluation Rubric
• Input – Observations, Perception Surveys & Artifacts (i.e.
Lesson Plans, Student Work,…)
• State Rubric Aligned to WPSD Learning Principles
• Completed throughout the school year with an initial rating
shared by April 15th and finalized in May
• WPSD Web-Based Dashboard System
Rubric Structure and Rating Level Focus
The focus of the Basic
rating level is the educator
whose performance does
not meet state
performance standards
and who is not achieving
at expected levels.
The focus of Partially Proficient and
Proficient levels is what educators do on
a day-to-day basis to achieve state
performance standards and assure that
students are achieving at expected
levels.
The focus of Accomplished and Exemplary
ratings shifts to the outcomes of the
educator’s practices, including expectations for
staff, students, parents and community
members, as a result of practices exhibited
under rating levels 2 and 3.
Teacher
Quality
Standards
Performance
Rating Levels
Elements of
the
Standard
Professional
Practices
Elements of
the
Standard
Professional
Practice is Not
Observable
Professional
Practice is
Observable
Scoring the Rubric
Determining the teacher’s professional practices rating
is a three-step process that involves rating the
individual elements and standards and using those to
determine the overall rating on professional practices.
1. Rating the Elements
2. Rating the Standards
3. Determining the Overall Professional Practices Rating
Reading the Rubric
Understanding the Scoring
“Business” Rule
Look for the first unchecked professional practice.
Move one column back to identify the rating for the element.
Determining the Element Rating
Look for the first unchecked professional practice.
Move one column back to identify the rating for the element.
Determining the Element Rating
Look for the first unchecked professional practice.
Move one column back to identify the rating for the element.
Rubric Rating Levels
Standard
Partially
Proficient
Proficient
Accomplished
Exemplary
Professional
Practices
Professional
Practices
Professional
Practices
Professional
Practices
Professional
Practices
0
1
Educator’s
performance on
professional
practices is
significantly
below the state
performance
standard.
Educator’s
performance on
professional
practices is
below the state
performance
standard.
2
Educator meets
state
performance
standard.
3
Educator
exceeds state
standard.
4
Educator
significantly
exceeds state
standard.
Basic
Element
Final Standard Rating
2
Final Professional Practice Rating
• Based on Total of Average Standards Ratings
Std 1: Clear Instructional Goals & Objectives
Std 2: Personalized & Relevant
Std 3: Engagement
Std 4: Timely & Specific Feedback
Std 5: Professional Responsibilities
Professional Practice Overall Rating
•
•
•
•
•
Basic
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Accomplished
Exemplary
Professional
Practice Rubric
Rating
Basic
Partially Proficient
Proficient
Accomplished
Exemplary
Rating
0-3
4-7
8-12
13-16
17-20
STUDENT ACADEMIC GROWTH
State Requirements
• Measure of Individually attributed student learning
outcomes
• Measure of Collectively attributed student learning
outcomes
• Statewide summative assessment (TCAP/ACT) results
and growth, when available
• Multiple Measures
WPSD Academic Growth Components
• 20% School Performance Framework
(Collectively Attributed)
• 80% Measures of Student Learning
(Individually Attributed)
20% School Performance Framework (SPF)
Scoring Matrix
Rating
% of Framework Points Earned
4
At or above 80%
3
At or above 64% - below 80%
2
At or above 52% - below 64%
1
Below 52%
80% Measures of Student Learning
• Looking for Evidence of Effectiveness
• Stepping through 3 “Looks”
1st Look:
Growth Modeling Measures
• TCAP Gains, MAP Gains, & DIBELS Gains
• 2 Years of Data
• Points assigned based on high growth,
average growth, and low growth
• Computed within the Dashboard system
Proficient or Advanced
Rating = Teacher’s
Growth Score
Below Proficient
Not Applicable
2nd Look:
District Learning Measures
• District Approved Assessments
• 2 Years of Data
• Process to be rolled out starting in the
2014-15 school year
Proficient or Advanced
Rating = Teacher’s
Growth Score
Below Proficient
Not Applicable
3rd Look: Student Growth Objectives (SGO)
• Teachers utilize standards to…
 Establish learning outcomes,
 Monitor students’ progress toward these outcomes,
and
 Evaluate the degree to which students achieve these
outcomes using relevant, meaningful measures
• Collaborative process between evaluatee and
evaluator
Final rating determined at the end of the evaluation
year based on data from all “Looks”
20% SPF
Overall Growth Rating Matrix
Overall
Growth
Rating
Matrix
4
3
2
1
80% Individually Attributed
1
2
3
4
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
3
3
3
3
4
4
4
3
FINAL EFFECTIVENESS RATING
Final Effectiveness Rating
50% Prof
Practice
Final
Effectiveness
Rating Matrix
E
A
P
PP
B
50% Student Growth
2
3
1
Effective
4
Highly Effective
Effective
Partially Effective
Effective
Partially Effective
Ineffective
Partially Effective
WPSD SYSTEM & TIMELINES
WPSD Evaluation System Process
• Year-long
• Clear timelines
• Cyclical
QUESTIONS