Transcript Slide 1

Springfield Public Schools
Springfield Effective Educator
Development System (SEEDS)
April 2013
The District Management Council
70 Franklin Street
Boston, MA 02110
Tel: 877.DMC.3500
www.dmcouncil.org
Timeline

Submit your collection of evidence:



Receive the final evaluation report:

By April 22nd, if non-PTS

By June 1st, if PTS is due to receive a summative evaluation

By June 20th, if PTS is due to receive a formative evaluation
Sign the evaluation report to acknowledge receipt:


By April 20th, or a date established by your evaluator
By June 1st
Have a conference with the evaluator (optional)

By June 1st

Required if the summative rating is “Needs Improvement” or
“Unsatisfactory”

Optional if summative rating is “Proficient” or “Exemplary”
2
Overview of summative evaluations


What is the purpose?

(1) for you to receive feedback on how you did this year and how
you can continue to grow

(2) for the evaluator to determine a rating on your performance that
determines your educator plan and/or staffing for next year
What is your role?

Gather and submit your collection of evidence that is:

Meaningful (quality is more important than quantity)

Covers all 6 areas of evaluation:
1.
Student learning goal:
2.
Professional practice goal:
3.
Standard I:
4.
Standard II:
5.
Standard III:
6.
Standard IV:
3
How will ratings be determined?
Evaluator’s activity
Resources the evaluator will use
Determine ratings on:
1. Standard I
2. Standard II
3. Standard III
4. Standard IV
•
•
•
•
Teacher rubric
Observation records
Educator collection of evidence
Other evidence (e.g., data)
Determine attainment of:
1. Professional Practice Goal(s)
2. Student Learning Goal(s)
•
•
•
•
Rubric on Attainment of Goals
Observation records
Educator collection of evidence
Other evidence (e.g., data)
Determine the overall summative rating*
•
•
•
Professional judgment
Ratings on all four Standards
Assessment of attainment of goals
*Note: to be rated Proficient overall, an educator must be rated at least Proficient on Standard I and Standard II.
4
Exercise #1: Think like an evaluator – assess the goals
Step 1: Take out the handout “Exercise: Goal Attainment”
Step 2: Review the educator’s goal and data.
Step 3: Using the rubric, determine a rating on the educator’s
attainment of goal. Provide a rationale for your rating.
5
What will your summative rating mean for next year?
Overall Rating
Educator plans / Staffing decisions
PTS educators
Non-PTS educators
Exemplary
Obtain
PTS
Self-Directed
Growth Plan
(Must be at
least Proficient
on all standards
and overall)
(2-year or 1-year)
Proficient
Developing
Educator
Plan
Needs Improvement
Directed
Growth Plan
Nonrenewal
Unsatisfactory
Improvement Plan
6