Transcript OTES PowerPoint Presentation - Springboro Community Schools

Springboro Community City School District
Todd Petrey, Superintendent
Jamie Miles, 8th Grade Science Teacher
SEA Vice-President
Meeting Purpose
 Establishing a Laser-like Focus - Pulling the plan
together
 Feedback
 Comment Cards:

Include name, school, grade level, and subject
 Submit to you principal
 We want your feedback
OTES Timeline
 Currently piloting across the district for the 2012-2013




school year
Continually revising and aligning the evaluation
system to meet the needs of our staff (using staff
feedback) and based on new information provided by
the state.
Training videos during staff meetings
Spring 2013(SLOs): Develop student growth measures
with principals
Implementation 2013-2014 school year
OTES Focus
 Based on the OTES Model which is aligned with the




Ohio Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Individual student growth: “differentiation”
Coaching model
Individualized teacher rating system based on specific
data selected by the teacher
50% teacher performance and 50% student growth
measures
Special Area Teachers
 Art, Music, PE
 Intervention Specialists
 Media Specialists, Speech Therapists, and Counselors
 Must instruct students at least 50% of the time to be
evaluated using the student growth measures
 More information TBA
1
Ohio Teacher Evaluation System (OTES)
Teacher Performance
Pre-conference
Observation
Pre-conference
Observation
(both completed
by May 1)
Final Review
and
Conference
Expected
Growth
Formal Observation
and Classroom
Walkthroughs/
Informal
Observations
Formal Observation and
Classroom Walkthroughs/
Informal Observations
Mid-Year Review
and
Conference
Above
Expected
Growth
Professional Growth Plan
Teacher Performance on Standards
Teacher
Performance
on Standards
50%
Student
Growth
Measures
50%
Post-conference
Below
Expected
Growth
Improvement
Plan
Post-conference
Complete
Performance Rubric
Complete Performance
Rubric
Written Report
(by May 10)
Final Summative Rating
Accomplished
Proficient
Developing
Ineffective
Teacher Performance
 Composed of:
 Two formal observations (a minimum of 30 minutes
each)
 Informal walkthroughs
 Uses rubrics aligned with the Ohio Standards for the
Teaching Profession
 Teacher holistic performance rating
 Ratings: 1 (Ineffective), 2(Developing), 3 (Proficient), or
4 (Accomplished)
Student Growth Measures
 All teachers must have a minimum of three student
growth measures (some are State selected)
 Teachers can choose up to five student growth
measures
 Teachers are divided into three categories:
Student Growth Measures and
Teacher Type
2
Student Growth Measures
 Teachers can choose the percentage each student





growth measure is worth
The percentages must add up to 50%.
Building value-added data is set at 10% of the total
score.
Teacher value-added date (if required) is set at a
minimum of 10% of the total score.
The other 30% is to be set by the individual teacher.
Student growth measure summative score
 Above, expected, below
Identifying Teacher Rating
Teacher performance rating
+
Student growth measure rating
=
Teacher Rating
(ineffective, developing, proficient, accomplished)
3
Fill out your card.
Include: name, building, grade level, subject
Give to your principal
Responses to questions will be sent through email.