Transcript Utilizing Reverse Short Channel Effect for Optimal
Low Power and High Speed Multi Threshold Voltage Interface Circuits By
Sherif A. Tawfik and Volkan Kursun
Presented by Ramasamy Ethiraj
Contents
• Introduction • Standard Feedback-Based Level Converters • Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converters • Delay and Power consumption of level Converters - Comparison of level converters - The performance of level converters under Supply Voltage and Process Parameter Variations - Multi Vth-CMOS Technology • CONCLUSION
Introduction
• Scaling the supply voltage to reduce the power • Lower supply will degrade the speed • Multi-V DD Techniques and Conventional Level converters are introduced.
• Conventional Level converters will introduce DC current and feedback circuit (hence slow response) • Multi-Vth Level converters will eliminate DC current and Feedback circuit.
Standard Level Converters 1 (LC1)
• V DDL is directly connected to M3 & M4 – DC path. So high power • Feedback circuit – more delay.
• M1 & M2 should be large, because V DDL Result in large capacitance and area is directly connected.
Standard Level Converters 2 (LC2)
• V DDL is not directly connected to PMOS – still some DC current • Feedback circuit – more delay.
• More device count- more delay and power • M2 should be large, because V DDL large capacitance and area is directly connected. Result in
Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter1 (PC1)
• V th-M2 should be more negative than V DDL –V DDH to avoid DC current • No feedback circuit – less delay.
• less device count- less delay, area and power • Smaller transistor sizes.
Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter2 (PC2)
• V th-M2 should be more negative than V DDL –V DDH to avoid DC current • Multi V th is used for M3. • Lowest delay compare to other converters • No feedback circuit – less delay.
• Smaller transistor sizes.
Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter2 (PC2)
• V th-M2 should be more negative than V DDL –V DDH to avoid DC current • M3,M4,C is removed for lower V DDL • No feedback circuit – less delay.
• Smaller transistor sizes.
Simulation Setup
• 0.18um technology • V DDH = 1.8V
• Simulated for different V DDL : 0.5, 1 and 1.2V
• Wn = Wmin, Wp = 2.5Wn
• Delay is measured between input of I D and Node2 • Power consumption measured for entire setup
Optimum Delay and Power measurements
Normalized to LC2
The performance of level converters under Supply Voltage and Process Parameter Variations
Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC2 for Power optimized circuit (VDDL = 1.2V)
Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC1 for Power optimized circuit (V DDL = 1V)
Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC1 for Power optimized circuit (VDDL = 0.5V)
V th-M2 vs. Power and Delay
Conclusions
•
Multi-V th level converters has up to 78% less delay compare to standard level converters • 70% less power consumption • Less Device count and size – minimum Area • Wide range of threshold voltages • High speed and low power.