Utilizing Reverse Short Channel Effect for Optimal

Download Report

Transcript Utilizing Reverse Short Channel Effect for Optimal

Low Power and High Speed Multi Threshold Voltage Interface Circuits By

Sherif A. Tawfik and Volkan Kursun

Presented by Ramasamy Ethiraj

Contents

• Introduction • Standard Feedback-Based Level Converters • Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converters • Delay and Power consumption of level Converters - Comparison of level converters - The performance of level converters under Supply Voltage and Process Parameter Variations - Multi Vth-CMOS Technology • CONCLUSION

Introduction

• Scaling the supply voltage to reduce the power • Lower supply will degrade the speed • Multi-V DD Techniques and Conventional Level converters are introduced.

• Conventional Level converters will introduce DC current and feedback circuit (hence slow response) • Multi-Vth Level converters will eliminate DC current and Feedback circuit.

Standard Level Converters 1 (LC1)

• V DDL is directly connected to M3 & M4 – DC path. So high power • Feedback circuit – more delay.

• M1 & M2 should be large, because V DDL Result in large capacitance and area is directly connected.

Standard Level Converters 2 (LC2)

• V DDL is not directly connected to PMOS – still some DC current • Feedback circuit – more delay.

• More device count- more delay and power • M2 should be large, because V DDL large capacitance and area is directly connected. Result in

Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter1 (PC1)

• V th-M2 should be more negative than V DDL –V DDH to avoid DC current • No feedback circuit – less delay.

• less device count- less delay, area and power • Smaller transistor sizes.

Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter2 (PC2)

• V th-M2 should be more negative than V DDL –V DDH to avoid DC current • Multi V th is used for M3. • Lowest delay compare to other converters • No feedback circuit – less delay.

• Smaller transistor sizes.

Proposed Multi-Vth Level Converter2 (PC2)

• V th-M2 should be more negative than V DDL –V DDH to avoid DC current • M3,M4,C is removed for lower V DDL • No feedback circuit – less delay.

• Smaller transistor sizes.

Simulation Setup

• 0.18um technology • V DDH = 1.8V

• Simulated for different V DDL : 0.5, 1 and 1.2V

• Wn = Wmin, Wp = 2.5Wn

• Delay is measured between input of I D and Node2 • Power consumption measured for entire setup

Optimum Delay and Power measurements

Normalized to LC2

The performance of level converters under Supply Voltage and Process Parameter Variations

Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC2 for Power optimized circuit (VDDL = 1.2V)

Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC1 for Power optimized circuit (V DDL = 1V)

Power and Delay comparison – LC2 vs. PC1 for Power optimized circuit (VDDL = 0.5V)

V th-M2 vs. Power and Delay

Conclusions

Multi-V th level converters has up to 78% less delay compare to standard level converters • 70% less power consumption • Less Device count and size – minimum Area • Wide range of threshold voltages • High speed and low power.

Thank You