Result-based Management

Download Report

Transcript Result-based Management

Review of CoP-MfDR Pilot Phase

Sharing Experiences and Lessons Learned

Third International Roundtable on Managing for Development Results Hanoi, Vietnam February 5-8, 2007

Objectives

To share the experience of pilot operation of CoP-MfDR in terms of achievements, challenges progress, issues and

To share and discuss the lessons learned for replication and scale-up in other regions

Introduction of CoP

 The

“community of practice”

is a particular type of network that features peer-to-peer collaborative activities to build

driven

societal capabilities.

 variety of terms to describe similar phenomena, such as “learning networks,” net-

Peer to Peer VLN

works,” “thematic groups,” etc.

 The essential features of

CoP-MfDR

are:

Background of CoP-MfDR

Launched in March 2006 with the vision:

‘ To contribute to the enhancement sustainable capacity for results management among countries in Asia and the Pacific’.

of

with main focus:

To establish the mutual trust among members, sharing their ideas, and experiences through informal discussions.

with key practices thru VLN:

First such kind of effort (virtual learning network) in developing countries with different languages and concept and a challenging initiative.

different development stages and is totally a new

CoP-MfDR Structure & Key Functions

Four layered structure:

    Coordinating Committee Core group members [5] [30] MfDR experts and donor/partners [20] Peripheral members [100] 

Commitment to contribute towards three key outcomes:

 Improved institutional coordination and cooperation of planning, budgeting and implementing agencies within governments;   Enhanced capacity development thru sharing good practices and information on MfDR, Improved awareness-raising and country ownership thru deepened understanding of MfDR principles and practices.

Structural Layers

Progress & Key Activities

VLN Operation

           

Interim Coordination Committee (ICC) meetings Online discussions

Expert-led discussion On-line postings and comments National/sectoral, project, & civil society CoP members contributed on three MfDR themes 4 topics 100 entries 20 papers 20 papers

Other key online activities

Monthly email newsletters CoP members Q & A CoP MfDR Library with Members’ Collection and Country Folders MfDR Resource Center (250 files) MfDR Sourcebook translation

Advantages of the CoP Format

     

Participation

   

Voluntary vs compulsory Developing countries’ voice Working level practitioners’ voice Both mid-income and low-income developing countries Networking

 

Build relationship & trust Learning experiences Sustainability

 

On-going vs single time activity Flexible vs time-bound Modality

  

Free expression Personal opinions vs official capacity Informal vs informal Information sharing

Resources —toolkits, reports, case studies etc

On-line library Cost-effective

Issues and Challenges: Virtual Learning Network

 Relevance of topics / focus:  Language barrier  “Online fatigue”  CoP Library needs improvement  Technical / access / website problems

Face-to-face events

 Build and maintain mutual trust  Focus on implementation on the ground  To serve as milestones of online discussions  Format (training, study tours, workshops)  Frequency and size

Lessons Learned

      

Demand-driven topic selection Incentives for participation Proper scheduling of online activities Address language problem

 Country-based CoPs in native language

Address technical problems Scaling up of CoP

 Develop country-based or network-based CoPs (core group members are focal points)  Publish CoP member contributions  Link with other MfDR or similar networks

Sustainable financing

 Co-financing from other development partners  Development partners reflect and respond to the voice of the CoP

THANKS