Transcript Title

DC Cruickshank Master Plan
Final Concept Community Info Session
Dalkeith
Tennis
Club
Point
Resolution
D C Cruickshank
Master Plan
Briefing
Dalkeith Nedlands
Bowling Club
Collegians
Football Club
Master Plan - work completed to date
Action
Date - 2012
First round of community consultation
Feb/March
Ongoing consultation with the 3 involved sports clubs
January onwards
Change in scope of the project from investigating one
building option to now investigating three options.
April
The development of the sketches for the three reserve
options. Costings allocated to the three options.
May/June
Presentation of the three reserve options and costings to
Council, clubs and community
Late June
Architect to prepare final concept for reserve and draft
Master Plan report to Council
July/August
Advice to Council of final concept, combined sports club
meeting and community information session (TONIGHT  )
Late August/Sept
Master Plan – the final steps to come
Action
Date
Final concept available for community comment
4 – 18 September
All feedback and sports club information to
Pendal and Neille to include in Master Plan report
20 September
City to work with Pendal and Neille to prepare
Master Plan report
20 September – 2 October
Master Plan to be presented to Council for
approval
November
Development Possibilities – a re-cap
OPTION 1:
- 3 buildings
- renovation of existing Bowls and Tennis Club buildings
- new Football Club building
OPTION 2:
- 2 buildings
- shared building for the Bowls and Tennis Clubs
- a separate new Football Club building
OPTION 3:
- 1 building
- Shared building for Bowls, Tennis and Football
- Located centrally to sporting facilities, with tennis and bowls in the
west end and football in an eastern wing
Community and Sports Club feedback of
Option 1
Likes
Clubs retain own culture
Financially best option
Dislikes
Huge cost of renovation
Road access through the site
Best position of buildings
Need larger social areas for clubs
Causes least disruption
BBQ facility
Keeps clubs separate – no conflict Thinner football oval
with shared use
Existing bowls and tennis are Football club building closer to
structurally sound – capitalise on Beatrice Road, noise issues
what is already there
Single storey buildings
Road access through the site
Community and Sports Club feedback of
Option 2
Likes
Keeps football club separate
Nothing – severely disliked
New, efficient buildings
Dislikes
Potential conflict arising from shared use
areas, how to manage?
Concern with mixing of bowls/tennis club
members
Cost to clubs
Marquee lawn in front of Shared building could mean loss of space
shared bowls/tennis building for the two clubs
Too many trees/large building blocking
view
Thinner football oval
Shared club building position gives a less
favourable view of playing areas
Community and Sports Club feedback of
Option 3
Likes
Nothing – severely
disliked
New, efficient building
Dislikes
Mixing of club members,
demographic especially
Cost to clubs
football
different
One building doesn’t work
Football club restricted view of oval
Too large a building
Loss of bowls floor space means loss of income
for club
Building bisects communal open areas, road
through access
Actions taken after June sessions
• As all parties agreed that Option 3 was not a preference
for the reserve, it was not considered further
• The roof over the bowling club green was removed from
the cost plan
• A life cycle cost analysis was completed in order to
compare the future operational costs of Option 1 v’s
Option 2
DC Cruickshank Reserve Masterplan
Prepared for the City of Nedlands
by
Pendal and Neille Architects
Studio Baan Architects
Revised Cost Plan
Cost description
Option 1
Option 2
Building component
$1,563,000 (bowls)
$1,101,000 (tennis)
$1,991,000 (footy)
$3,416,000 (bowls/tennis)
$1,970,000 (footy)
$270,000 (demolition and
Curator compound)
$1,140,000 (bowls)
$288,000 (tennis)
$47,000 (football)
$812,000
Playing surface and associated $912,000 (bowls)
hard landscape:
$242,000 (tennis)
$47,000 (football)
Roads, paths, parking, retaining $518,000
walls etc.
Soft landscape and minor works
$500,000
Design contingency (~10%)
$689,000
Consultants fees, Authority fees, $1,697,000
loose furniture and equipment,
client contingency (5%), client mgt
costs (2%)
TOTAL (excl. GST, escalation)
$9,260,000
$500,000
$845,000
$2,072,000
$11,360,000
Life Cycle Cost Analysis
Cost description
Option 1
Option 2
25 year life cycle analysis (includes
bowls and tennis building/s and playing
surfaces)
$6.8 million
$8.9 million
As a result of the lower total project and life cycle costing, as well as
overwhelming club and community feedback, the recommended final concept for
the DC Cruickshank Master Plan is Option 1.
Funding
Funding option
Information
Department
of
Sport
and Will fund aspects of facilities that have direct potential
Recreation (Community Sporting increase participation in sport e.g. Sports surfaces,
and Recreation Facilities Fund)
lighting, toilets, change rooms etc. to a maximum of a
third of the total project cost.
Regional Development Australia Grants of between $500,000 and $15 million (GST
Fund (Federal Government)
exclusive) will be available for eligible projects.
Preference is for facilities that provide a regional benefit
to the community. Does fund upgrades to existing
infrastructure.
City of Nedlands
Currently only funds sports clubs as a part of the CSRFF
application process.
Sports clubs
The ability of the sports clubs to fund a third of such
developments to the club buildings and playing surfaces
is very limited. Support from avenues other than income
from club membership will be required for renovation
plans to progress.
WA Treasury Corporation
Provide loans to LGA’s
Discussion/Questions
Next step: Council meeting in November and if
approved finalises this project
Please ask questions regarding any information
regarding this Master Plan.
We thank you for your participation throughout
the DC Cruickshank Master Plan process. It
has been greatly appreciated.