Transcript Federal Plan of Work/Annual Report

DANRIS-X:
Why, When, How?!
New Advisor Training
September 24, 2009
Web Conference
Desired Outcomes

Understanding of the DANRIS-X components and their linkages

Understanding of the uses of DANRIS-X data

Understanding of the DANRIS-X reporting calendar

Understanding of the Academic Annual Evaluation DANRIS-X
retrieval

Understanding how to define and report outcomes

Awareness of available DANRIS-X Help resources
Plan for the Day
5’
Welcome & Introductions
Katherine
35’
Overview presentation
Katherine/David
45’
Review the application
Chris/David
5’
Wrap-up/Meeting evaluation
Adjourn
120’ Call-in with specific questions
Why do we have DANRIS-X?




Eliminate duplicative effort; link
current systems
Provide accountability to
stakeholders (local, county, state,
and federal governments and the
general public)
Document programmatic
outcomes/impacts more fully
Document that all CE programs
comply with USDA nondiscrimination policy
CRIS
Reporting
System
AES Faculty
Federal
Annual
Plan &
Report
DANRIS-X
Annual Plan
CE Specialists
DANRIS-X
Annual Report
CE Specialists
State, County
Reports
DANRIS-X
Annual Plan
CE Advisors
DANRIS-X
CASA
CE Advisors
Linking Our Systems
DANRIS-X
Annual Report
CE Advisors
Other
Reports
CE Advisor
PR,
Annual
Evaluation
How Administration Uses DANRIS-X Data

Federal Annual Plan and Report

ANR Program Planning/Resource Allocation

Legislative/External/Internal Requests
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
2007 Combined Research and Extension
Federal Annual Report
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
DIVISION OF AGRICULTURE AND
NATURAL RESOURCES
Agricultural Experiment Station
and Cooperative Extension
FY 2009-2013 Combined Research
and Extension Federal Plan
Submitted April 1, 2008
Approved May 19, 2008
Agricultural Experiment Station
and Cooperative Extension
Submitted April 1, 2008
Approved May 19, 2008
How Government Uses Our Reporting Info.

Demonstrate Accountability

Secure Funding / Budget Cycle

Policy Making

Generate Public Support
ANR Academic FTE by Topic
250
200
150
Advisors
Specialists
AES faculty
FTE
100
50
0
NR and
Environ
Plants and Animals and Ag, NR and Food/non Econ, mkts Human nut, Families,
systems
systems
biol eng
food prods and policy food safety,
youth,
health
communi.
Topic
Prog/proj
suppt,
admin,
comm
CD Admin
FTE
Del
Norte
◆
Siskiyou
Humboldt
Tehama
Mendocino
◆
◆
◆
◆ advisors self- reporting in DANRIS-X FTE (.10 -1.00)
Colusa
ANR Pest Mgt Issue (plants)
Sierra
◆
◆◆◆◆
◆◆ ◆◆◆
◆◆
◆◆ ◆
◆
◆
◆◆ ◆◆◆
◆◆ ◆ ◆◆
◆◆ ◆ ◆
◆◆◆◆ ◆
◆
◆◆
◆◆◆◆
Lake
◆
IPM Affiliated Advisors
Plumas
Butte
Glenn
IPM Advisors
Lassen
b
Yu
Su
Lucia Varela, North Coast ( Sonoma)
◆
Shasta
Trinity
ANR Pest Management Activity
Modoc
a
a
ad
N ev
Placer
tte
Carolyn Pickel, Sacramento Valley (Sutter-Yuba)
r
El Dorado
Yolo
Sonoma Napa
Solano
M
ar
in
Affiliated: John Roncoroni
(Napa)
San Francisco
San Mateo
Affiliated: Steve Swain (Marin)
Contra
Costa
Alpine
Sacra
dor
mento A m a
s
ra
ve
la
Ca
San
Tuolumne
Joaquin
Alameda
Santa
Clara
St
an
is
la
us
Mono
Anil Shresta separated (Central Valley, KAC)
Mariposa
Merced
Pete Goodell, Jim Stapleton, Walt Bentley
–Central Valley (KAC)
Madera
Santa Cruz
San
Benito
Fresno
Inyo
Tulare
Monterey
Kings
San Luis
Obispo
◆
Kern
Affiliated: David Haviland (Kern)
◆◆◆◆
San Bernardino
Santa Barbara
◆
Phil Phillips Retired (Central Coast, Ventura)
Ventura
◆◆
◆
Los Angeles
Orange
◆◆
Riverside
San Diego
June, 2008
Cheryl Wilen, San Diego
◆◆◆◆◆
Imperial
◆
How Advisors can use DANRIS-X data




Program Development
 Captures logic model information: need, participation, activities,
outputs, outcomes
Accountability
 Document providing goods/services/results and compliance with
non-discrimination policy
Merit and Promotion process (Optional)
 Use the Annual Evaluation Retrieval
 Record information for Program Review Dossier
In the future
 Network using the database search
Academic Annual Evaluation Retrievals

Data retrieved from DANRIS-X Plan & Report

2 Retrievals: Parts of Sections A & B and Section C

Available as Word document to download


Access on the Program Review website or in the
DANRIS-X application
Upload to on-line Program Review web site
DANRIS-X Calendar
Based on federal fiscal year: FY 2009 = Oct 1, 2008 – Sept 30, 2009
Oct 19, 2009
Oct 22, 2009
FY 2009 Report and CASA CLOSES
FY 2010 Report and CASA OPENS
Oct 22, 2009
Annual Evaluation Retrieval AVAILABLE
Nov 17, 2009
Academic Annual Evaluation DUE on PR site
Nov 9, 2009
CD CASA Reports DUE
Jan 11, 2010
Mar 9, 2010
FY 2011 Plan OPEN
FY 2011 Plan CLOSES
Advisors’ 3 Modules

CASA

Annual Plan

Annual Report
CASA (Contacts And Self Assessment)

Clientele groups definitions

Actual contacts

Outreach methods

Outreach accomplishments
Advisor Annual Plan

County FTE allocation
ANR Issue/Knowledge Area FTE

Projects/Programs







Situation Statements
Clientele
Commodities
Methods
Anticipated Outcomes
Multi-state Activities
Advisor Annual Report
Projects/Programs:





Activities
Actual Outcomes
Publications
Grant Support
Multi state Activities
Individual Information (optional):



University/Public Service
Professional Competence
Annual Evaluation Narratives
Emphases on Results

Quantification of activities/products – Outputs

Quantification of accomplishments – Outcomes

Documentation of longer-term effects - Impacts
Outputs: What did you deliver?

Direct Extension Methods


Indirect Extension Methods


Newsletter, Websites, Radio Programs…
Research and Creative Activity Methods


Classes, Workshops, Field Days…
Basic/Applied Research, Videos, Curricula…
Publications
Outcomes:

Learning Outcomes ~ short-term changes




Knowledge
Attitude
Skill
Action Outcomes ~ medium-term changes


How was the group/area affected?
Behavior/Practice
Condition Outcomes (Impacts) ~ long-term changes



Social/Health
Economic
Environmental
Steps for Defining an Outcome

What?

Who?

Quantification?
Knowledge Outcome:

1388 child care staff and
parents of preschool children
gained knowledge on packing
safe and healthy brown bag
lunches for preschool children
Behavior Outcome:

175 rice farmers and pest control advisers
developed weed management programs
that rotate modes of action on at least
50% of the total acreage to minimize
herbicide resistance development.
Economic Outcome/Impact:

Pistachio owner/operators, with
orchards covering 50,000 acres, have
begun to utilize mechanical pruning
instead of labor-based cultural
practices, which reduced their
management costs from $200 per acre
to about $50.
Program Action: Logic Model
Outcomes
Situation
Plan
Situation
Statement:
Identify
Problem
or Need
Inputs
Report
Grants:
Invest
Staff,
Volunteers,
Money,
Materials
Activities/
Outputs
Knowledge
& Behavior
Report
Activities &
Publications:
Deliver
Products
or
Services
Report
Impacts
Report
Outcomes:
Outcomes:
Change in
Program
Participants
Change to
Population
or Area
Next Steps





Form a DANRIS-X advisory committee
Get feedback from advisors, specialists and
administrators through survey and/or focus
groups
Consider feedback and administrative and
programmatic needs to determine
changes/enhancements
Work on a “datamart” query system for all
users to retrieve information in real time
Ability to search system
Resources


People
 Christopher Hanson: (510) 987-0628 or
[email protected]
 Katherine Webb-Martinez: (510) 987-0029 or
[email protected]
 David White: (510) 987-0095 or
[email protected] (For CASA content/policy only)
Website: http://ucanr.org/danris-x




ANR Core Issues document
Knowledge Area Classification document
Report & CASA Manuals
PowerPoint presentations
The End…
Questions?
Comments?
