Transcript Document
Signs of Safety: Integrating a Solution Focused Approach to Protecting Children in Massachusetts 1 GOALS FOR THIS OVERVIEW Participants will: Gain some basic familiarity with the Signs of Safety approach to family protection Learn about our experience in integrating the Signs of Safety into our state agency child welfare practice Hear about the next generation of tools we are developing in a differential response model 2 DSS Vision and Mission Statement Our Vision is… To ensure the safety of children in a manner that holds the best hope of nurturing a sustained, resilient network of relationships to support the child’s growth and development into adulthood. Our Mission is… To support the safety, permanency and well-being of children through the development and integration of new child welfare practices and behaviors that are: Child-driven Family-centered Community-focused Strengths-based Committed to Diversity and Cultural Competence, and Committed to Continuous Learning and Innovation 3 SIGNS OF SAFETY (Turnell & Edwards, 1999) Signs of Safety are observable and identifiable capacities within: individuals families communities That increase the likelihood that a child will be: physically, emotionally, and developmentally protected from maltreatment and support a child’s resiliency and healing in situations where maltreatment has occurred. 4 SIGNS OF SAFETY PRACTICE PRINCIPLES THAT BUILD PARTNERSHIPS Respect Service Participants As People Worth Doing Business With. Cooperate With The Person, Not The Abuse Recognize That Cooperation Is Possible Even When Coercion Is Required Recognize That All Families Have Signs Of Safety Maintain A Focus On Safety Learn What The Service Recipient Wants Always Search For Detail Focus On Creating Small Change Don’t Confuse Case Details With Judgments Offer Choices Treat The Interview As A Forum For Change Treat The Practice Principles As Aspirations, Not Assumptions 5 SIGNS OF SAFETY THE SIX PRACTICE PRINCIPLES Treat the practice principles as aspirations rather than assumptions Understand The Position Of Each Family Member Find Exceptions To The Maltreatment Discover Family Strengths And Resources Focus On Goals Scale Safety and Progress Assess Willingness, Confidence, & Capacity 6 Distinguishing Between Treatment & Therapy Goal of Child Protection Case Work Family functions such that child is in danger Treatment Family functions such that child is “safe enough” Therapy Family functions “ideally” Turnell & Edwards, 1997 Point at which statutory agency closes case 7 INTEGRATING SIGNS OF SAFETY INTO DSS PRACTICE SHORT-TERM Required Component of Social Worker PreService Training – 2 Days Integrate Into Family Service (Action) Plan LONGER-TERM System Redesign Using a Differential Response Model (Family Engagement Model) Incorporation of Structured, Actuarially-based Decision-making Tools (Children’s Resource Center) 8 Family Engagement Model Overview 9 Family Engagement Model Case Flow Diagram 10 Capacity Assessment Guide: Safety—The Concept Model Guided Interview: Social worker records notes and observations directly into the sections of the tool Observable and identifiable lapses in capacity that increase likelihood of maltreatment Observable and identifiable capacity that increases likelihood of protection 11 Capacity Ratings: A Scaling Model with Actuarial Elements 1 2 Immediate Danger Moderate Danger 3 Balanced Safety and Danger 4 5 Optimal Safety Adequate Safety Rate each Capacity along a Safety/Danger Scale 12 Overall Rating: Frequency Model Capacity Assessment Guide Unified Entry Protective Response Assessment FCR Response Closing # of 1s 2 1 0 0 0 # of 2s 4 5 4 2 0 # of 3s 3 3 4 6 3 # of 4s 1 1 2 2 5 # of 5s 0 0 0 0 2 Decision Point facilitated by Assessment Tool 13 What We’ve Learned From Other States IF YOU INCORPORATE SIGNS OF SAFETY INTO CHILD WELFARE PRACTICE WITHOUT ALSO SHIFTING THE WAY YOU ENGAGE AND RELATE TO FAMILIES, THE RESULTS WILL NOT BE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT. THIS IS NOT EASY! 14 Strengthening Families, Community by Community 15