The Critical Period Hypothesis
Download
Report
Transcript The Critical Period Hypothesis
The Critical Period Hypothesis
Critical period or critical periods?
The basic claim
Evidence for L1: feral children
Lenneberg, 1967
Bickerston, 1981
L2: L2 learning and acquisition
Bialystok, 1997,
Singleton & Lengyel, 1995
Feral children
Socialising, teaching
and observing
Problems
- ethical experiments?
- teacher=researcher
(bias)
- relation between lack
of language and mental
+ social retardation
Kamala and Amala
Found: 1920 (India)
Age: 8 years and 18
months
Taken into care
Limited vocabulary
Unusal words
No spontaneous use
No syntax
Genie
Found: 1970 (California)
Age: 13
Taken into care
Fast progress in vocabulary
Sign language
Making sense of chaos
Spatial intelligence
No apparent mental
retardation
Aspects of study
Neurological
Psychomotor
Cognitive
Affective
Linguistic
Contextual
Neurological considerations
Lateralisation
Time
- Lenneberg 2-puberty
- Krashen 5
- Walsh & Diller (1981):
different timetables for different functions
Right - hemisphere functioning in SLA
Obler, 1981: strategies of acquisition,
guessing meaning, formulaic utterances
Lots of counterevidence
- Hill, 1970, Sorenson, 1967 - multilingual tribes
-
Psychomotor considerations
Problems in accent studies
- native judgement
- testing isolated words and sentences
Key issue: accent
- depends on muscular plasticity,
subject to CP
- the Kissinger effect
Cognitive considerations
Piaget, 1972
- sharp change from concrete to formal
operation at puberty
- CP!! (+ or -??)
Superior cognitive capacity in adults (Ausubel, 1964)
- a watched pot never boils?
Rosansky, 1975
- „Problem-centred learning” of children
Piaget
- equilibrium for children and adults?
Rote and meaningful learning
Affective considerations
Attitudes, beliefs, stereotypes,
Inhibition
- egocentrism – decentration-defending ego
Identity (Guiora, language ego)
- face threat
- second identity
- permeability of
language ego
Linguistic considerations
Bilingualism
Strategies and processes in child L1 and L2
acqusition similar
Adults demonstrate similar mistakes
- acquisition order (Dulay and Burt, 1974),
- transfer is rare, creative langauge acquisition
- adults rely more on system of L1
Context
Learning vs. acquisition
Motivation for learning
Input (motherese vs. foreigner talk)
Peer pressure