Transcript Chuck SteffensKnowledge Management Service ManagerMicron

Micron and SharePoint 2013
for Document Management
Chuck Steffens
Knowledge Management Service Manager
Micron Technology, Inc.
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc. All rights reserved. Products are warranted only to meet Micron’s production data sheet specifications. Information, products, and/or specifications
are subject to change without notice. All information is provided on an “AS IS” basis without warranties of any kind. Dates are estimates only. Drawings are not to scale. Micron and
the Micron logo are trademarks of Micron Technology, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
July 17, 2015
Micron Confidential
|
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
1
About Chuck…
▶ At Micron nearly 23 years, ~18 in a variety of IT roles
▶ Knowledge Management Service Manager for the past five
years, responsible for content management and business
process solutions
Company Confidential
|
©2010 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
2
Disclaimer
▶ Required by my Legal and Procurement teams…
▶ The following slides are the opinion of Chuck Steffens, a
Micron team member, and do not necessarily represent
the views of Micron Technology, Inc. and should not be
viewed as an endorsement by Micron of any particular
service or solution…
July 17, 2015
Micron Confidential
|
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
3
Topics
▶ Background and why did we skip 2010?
▶ Why did 2013 meet our needs for a document
management system
▶ Significant Areas of Concern
July 17, 2015
Micron Confidential
|
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
4
Background and why did we skip 2010?
▶ SharePoint 2010 planning was well underway when we
had to put the project on hold due to resource availability
▶ In Sept 2011, we were still on track for a mid- to late
2012 upgrade
▶ Then SharePoint 2013 was announced, and other projects
aligned to that feature set
▶ So rather than impact the business with two back to back
upgrades, we skipped and focused on SharePoint 2013
 Atypical for Micron, we prefer to wait for upgrades
July 17, 2015
Micron Confidential
|
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
5
Why did 2013 meet our needs?
▶ Document hold/e-Discovery
▶ Reusable and more powerful workflow (e.g. workflow 1.0)
▶ Documents have a unique document ID
▶ Cost barrier removed
July 17, 2015
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
6
Significant Areas of Concern
▶ Significant architectural changes, even from SP 2010 plans
 Virtualization
•
Opted for virtualized farms (except for dbs); easier to scale
 Consolidation
•
Dropping from 11 prod farms to 6; 2 enterprise, 2 site
specific, 2 function specific
 Storage changes to further reduce costs
▶ Used Premier Support early in process to validate plans
▶ Hired Microsoft Consulting to assist with some aspects
 Sometimes conflicting information
July 17, 2015
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
7
Significant Areas of Concern
▶ Business Intelligence customer impacts
 PowerView, PowerPivot, plans to expand Excel Services
usage
 PerformancePoint dashboards and Report Center reports
needed to be republished
 Hired partner to assist with conversion
July 17, 2015
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
8
Significant Areas of Concern
▶ SharePoint customer impacts
 Office 2003 Web Components widely used
 Meeting Workspace template
 Search and security
 Migration Tools to minimize upgrade impact
July 17, 2015
©2013 Micron Technology, Inc.
|
9