Multi-Jurisdictional Data Interoperability – the Advantage

Download Report

Transcript Multi-Jurisdictional Data Interoperability – the Advantage

Thursday, August 9, 1:30pm - 2:45pm
Introduction
Steve Ambrosini – Director of Operations,
IJIS Institute
 Major Topic Areas

 The APCO / IJIS Partnership
 Information Sharing Imperative
 Public Safety Data Interoperability
 Relevant National Programs
 Resources and Information
The IJIS Institute
Joining the resources of industry with the interests of
government to improve the systems that provide critical
information to the justice and public safety professionals
that protect and serve our communities.

A non-profit consortium representing industry’s leading
companies

Funded by a combination of industry contributions and federal
grants

Providing services to local, state, tribal and federal organizations

Helping justice and public safety fully realize the power of
information
The APCO IJIS Alliance

Our Alliance: In January of 2006, APCO and
IJIS established an Alliance Partnership for the
purpose of collaboratively addressing the public
safety data interoperability issue.

Our Joint Mission: Ensure that the
approximately 6,500 emergency
communications centers are an effective and
integral component of the national public safety
and homeland security information sharing
environment
Our Joint Initiative
No Communications Center Left Behind

Advancing standards based information sharing in the
emergency communications domain

Encompass the full range of public safety emergency
communications disciplines, including other relevant
homeland security domains

Provide a critical linkages to the Emergency and Disaster
Management domains being addressed by the Department
of Homeland Security

Explore the appropriate use of emerging national standards
(i.e. NIEM, EDXL, etc.))

Campaign to raise awareness as to the value of standards
for data interoperability

Build upon the work of the IJIS Public Safety Technology
Standards Council (IPSTSC
Strategy and Plan
Utilize the IJIS Public Safety Technology Standards
Council (IPSTSC) as a foundation

Funded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) and delivered by
an IJIS consortium that included APCO, IACP LEITSC and other
industry and government partners.

ISPTSC has set the basis for future cross-domain information
sharing with the broader Fire and EMS “first responder” community

IJIS and APCO intend to continue to work in conjunction with BJA
and allied organizations to raise awareness and advance
information sharing in emergency response

Endorsement and active involvement of the relevant national
industry organizations will continue

Submitted a joint grant to the BJA, as part of the 2007 Byrne grant
solicitation, seeking funding to advance public safety data
interoperability.
Information sharing is a
national imperative
In detecting, preventing, responding to and
investigating crimes, disasters and terrorist
acts, the exchange of information among
multiple engaged agencies must be timely
and accurate and therefore highly
automated.
Most existing computer systems are not designed to facilitate
information sharing across disciplines and jurisdictions.
Automated information sharing between agencies requires
the definition of common standards for linking disparate
systems.
Local, state, tribal, and Federal agencies need to adopt
common information sharing standards to facilitate
information sharing
The Power of Information
Helping justice and public safety organizations
reduce the impact of crime, terrorism and
natural disaster







Saving lives
Minimizing injury and property damage
Helping victims cope
Restoring order
Preventing terrorism
Solving crimes and prosecuting criminals
Improving the quality of life in America
National Program Funding
Over $2 billion in DOJ and DHS grants will be
distributed to justice and public safety in 2007
 A major portion of this funding is relevant to
interoperability, information sharing and
technology, supporting major national
programs:

 National Information Exchange Model (NIEM)
 Intelligence Fusion
 FBI National Data Exchange (N-DEx)
 Public Safety Interoperable Communications (PSIC)
What is Data Interoperability?
The ability to exchange information between and
among public safety computer systems – cross
discipline, cross jurisdiction, cross sector.
Key Assumptions:
1.
2.
Exchanges would benefit one or more agencies
Philosophy of “need to know” is replaced by
“responsibility to provide” (ODNI’s 100 Day Plan)
Potential Scenarios
BOLO’s,
Amber Alerts,
Pursuits
Hazmat Spills,
Natural
Disasters
Nuclear
Accident,
Terrorist Attack
How is Data Interoperability
Accomplished?
Technical
 Infrastructure
 Public - Web
 Public Safety - Nlets,
RISS

Data Standards
 GJXDM
 NIEM
 EDXL
 iEEE
Non-Technical
 Willingness
 Collaboration
 MOU’s
 Security
Considerations
 Privacy
Considerations
 Governance
Where have we been?
Automating call-taking and dispatching
functions
 Implementing Enhanced 9-1-1 services
in PSAP’s
 Enabling field communications
 Implementing records and case
management systems
 Implementing state and national criminal
information systems and networks

Where are we today?





Widespread automation of call-taking and
dispatching
E9-1-1 in the majority of U.S. jurisdictions
Advanced radio communications, including
interoperable voice and data infrastructure
Records and Case Management systems available
from a broad group of industry suppliers
Advanced data sharing networks on a national
level, with supporting standards for information
sharing (NIEM/ GJXDM, iEEE, EDXL, NIMS)
Where are we going?
Analog to digital communications – NG9-1-1
 Cross discipline, cross jurisdictional and
cross sector information sharing
 Advancing national standards for public
safety and justice information sharing with all
relevant business domains
 Leveraging communications and technology
infrastructures to support effective data
exchange services

National Standards for
PSAP Technologies
 Most
public safety professionals agree
that CAD interoperability is essential.
 Standards play a key role
 Emerging standards provide direction
 Requires support and contributions from
industry and practitioners
Why data standards for
PSAP’s?
National Perspective:
Most calls for assistance start with 9-1-1
 Incidents are Multi –Jurisdictional
 CAD Data flows to other responders:
Federal, State, Local, Tribal,
Secondary Responders – DOT,
CDC, Emergency Management

Why data standards for
PSAP’s?
Operational Perspective:

COST Effective way to share data
 Fewer Custom Interfaces
 Less Manual Intervention
Technical Support is easier for PSAP
 Vendors have common standards
 Federal Funding driving standards

What we need to do:
Raise awareness nationally, keep moving
forward:
Educate the majority of PSAP’s
 Educate the majority of Fire & EMS
 Educate the majority of elected officials
 Continue to push at association level
 Expand Functional Specifications for CAD and RMS
 Build upon the IPSTSC accomplishments

Relevant National Initiatives

GJXDM – Global Justice XML Data
Model

NIEM – National Information Exchange
Model

CAP – Common Alerting Protocol

EDXL – Emergency Data eXchange
Language
Global Justice XML Data Model
(GJXDM)

XML based data reference model

Global IS Initiative/ISWG, XSTF, GTRI

Sponsored by DOJ/OJP/BJA

Common language, vocabulary, methodology

Justice and public safety specific

National Standard independent of technology

Widely utilized today – Government/Industry
National Information Exchange
Model (NIEM)

Built upon GJXDM

Global Information Sharing Initiative

Sponsored by DOJ, DHS, ODNI

Embraces technology and application
characteristics of GJXDM
 Common Language, vocabulary, methodology

Designed to extend the reach of Justice and
public safety to all relevant domains

Release 2.0 now available
Common Alerting Protocol
(CAP)

OASIS/ EMTC

Sponsored by DHS/FEMA

Partners include Emergency Interoperability
Consortium (Industry)

Format for exchanging all-hazard emergency alerts
and public warnings independent of technology and
networks

Stand-alone protocol and payload for EDXL messages
Emergency Data eXchange
Language (EDXL)

OASIS EMTC

Sponsored by DHS/FEMA

XML based application

Integrated framework designed for broad EM data
exchange application

Provides a standard message distribution framework

Utilized over all data transport technologies (SOAP
HTTP)

Facilitates routing of XML formatted emergency
messages
Why Standards Matter

Common Language and Understanding

Coordinated Approach

Modular Development

Cost Savings and Reuse

Support Infrastructure
Current Status of Programs
and Projects

National Standards Initiatives

LEITSC Functional Specifications for
CAD and RMS

IPSTSC CAD IEPD Project

ITS/PS Information Exchange Project
(Transportation to Public Safety)
LEITSC Functional
Specifications for CAD and RMS

Law Enforcement Information Technology
Standards Council

Major CAD Functions:

Law Enforcement Dispatch

CAD System Administration

Support Services

Call Management & Management Reporting

Interfaces (internal and external)
Benefits of Standard
Functional Specifications

Serve as a basis for assessing the effectiveness of business
processes and existing IT systems

Ensure customer satisfaction by decreasing gaps in
communication between solution provider and LE customer

Facilitate better responses to RFP because the product will relate
to the Functional Standards

Serve as a guide to build to and help reduce the proliferation of
systems that are expensive for both agency and vendor

Help identify common data and exchange points for sharing
information with other agencies

Serve as a tool to ensure integration between law enforcement
CAD and RMS Systems.
IPSTSC CAD IEPD Project
IJIS Public Safety Technology Standards Council
 Promotes and contributes to the development of
technical and functional standards for public
safety IT components
 Provides industry input and policy review on
technical matters facing the public safety
community
 Serves as the industry counterpart to the public
sector’s Law Enforcement Information
Technology Standards Council (LEITSC).

IEPD Lifecycle
Business Driven Information Exchange
A NIEM IEPD can also be
reused in whole or in part to
speed development and lower
the cost of defining new
information exchanges
IEPD documents the
Information Exchange
Package (IEP) that will be
implemented to support the
information sharing needs for
COI’s.
A NIEM information exchange
begins with a business need for
sharing information by a
Community of Interest (COI)
within and across organizational
and jurisdictional boundaries
The Information Exchange
Package Documentation (IEPD)
is used to define how an
exchange should be expressed
using NIEM
The IEPD Life Cycle provides a consistent
process for introducing new elements to NIEM
and for reusing existing ones.
IPSTSC CAD IEPD Project

CAD to CAD IEPD’s
 Initial CFS Transfer








Query resource availability
Respond to resource availability
Subscribe to Unit Update
Unit Updates
Request Resource
Respond to resource request
CAD to RMS
Some Additional IEPD definition efforts:






Extension to Fire and EMS
External Alerts & Request for Service
CAD to RMS (transfers and queries)
RMS to RMS
Victim Notification
Prescription Drugs
ITS / Public Safety Exchange
Project
Public Safety to Transportation
Partnership between the Department of
Justice and Transportation to standardize
information exchanges between systems
 Supports highway incident responders and
traffic managers.

 Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
 State and large metropolitan Public Safety agencies
Transportation to Public
Safety Exchanges

Notification of an Incident
 Accident
 Lane obstruction


Requesting assistance
Requesting an asset (resource)
 Traffic Control
 Wrecker


Incident and Resource Updates
Notification of an Event
 Parade
 A one time planned event

Request for Road Conditions
Where we want to be?
New Exchange
Capabilities
New
Infrastructure
Solutions
Increased
Collaboration
“No
Communications
Center Left
Behind”
Practitioners and Industry involved!
Links and References
APCO
BJA
EDXL
ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC SAFETY COMMUNICATIONS OFFICIALS
WWW.APCOINTL.ORG
BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE
WWW.OJP.USDOJ.GOV/BJA
EMERGENCY DATA EXCHANGE LANGUAGE
WWW.OASIS-OPEN.ORG
GJXDM GLOBAL JUSTICE XML DATA MODEL
WWW.IT.OJP.GOV
IJIS
IJIS INSTITUTE
WWW.IJIS.ORG
LEITSC LAW ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY STANDARDS
COUNCIL
WWW.LEITSC.ORG
Links and References
NIEM
NATIONAL INFORMATION EXCHANGE MODEL
WWW.NIEM.GOV
NIMS
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
WWW.FEMA.GOV
NISS HELP DESKNATIONAL INFORMATION SHARING STANDARDS HELP DESK
HTTP://IT.OJP.GOV/NISS/HELPDESK
OJP
OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS, US DOJ
WWW.IT.OJP.GOV
IACP TECHNOLOGY CLEARINGHOUSE
WWW.IACPTECHNOLOGY.ORG
IEPD CLEARINGHOUSE
HTTP://IT.OJP.GOV/IEPD
ITS/PS INFORMATION EXCHANGE PROJECT
WWW.ITS.DOT.GOV/PS_TRANSINFOEXCHANGE
Contacts
Steve Ambrosini
IJIS Institute
[email protected]
703-726-1908
This project was supported by Grant No. 2003-LD-BX-0007 awarded by the Bureau of Justice Assistance. The Bureau
of Justice Assistance is a component of the Office of Justice Programs, which also includes the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, the National Institute of Justice, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, and the Office
for Victims of Crime. Points of view or opinions in this document are those of the author and do not represent the
official position or policies of the United States Department of Justice.