Transcript Document
TCAD Simulation for SOI Pixel Detector October 31, 2007 IEEE-NSS, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA Hirokazu Hayashi, Hirotaka Komatsubara (Oki Elec. Ind. Co.), Yasuo Arai, Masashi Hazumi (KEK), Yuji Saegusa (TIT) for the SOIPIX group SOIPIX collaborators KEK Detector Technology Project : [SOIPIX Group] Y. Arai*, M. Hazumi, Y. Ikegami, T. Kohriki, O. Tajima, S. Terada, T. Tsuboyama, Y. Unno, H. Ushiroda, H. IkedaA, K. HaraB, H. MiyakeB, H. IshinoC, Y. SaegusaC, T. KawasakiD, E. MartinE, G. VarnerE, H. TajimaF, K. FukudaG, H. HayashiG, H. KomatsubaraG, J. IdaG , M. OhnoG KEK、JAXAA, U. TsukubaB, TITC, Niigata U.D, U. HawaiiE, SLACF, OKI Elec. Ind. Co.G (*)—contact person 2006/10/31 M. Hazumi (KEK) 2 Overview TCAD = Technology CAD • ENEXSS (Environment for NExt Simulation System) • Developed by Selete (Semiconductor Leading Edge Technologies) ( http://www.selete.co.jp/?lang=EN ) • Full 3D process/device simulation ! • Commercially available from TCAD-International ( http://www.tcad-international.com/ENEXSS_e.html ) Real Specifications Function design LSI Manufacturing Fast Deeper understanding Virtual TCAD Logic design Circuit design Process data Device data Process simulation Layout design ~3mon. Mask fabrication Device production 2006/10/31 Characterization Prototyping Device simulation • • • • • Topics covered in this talk Back gate effect Circuit-sensor crosstalk Implantation parameters Guard ring design Pixel layout M. Hazumi (KEK) 3 Back gate effect Substrate voltage acts as Back Gate, and changes transistor threshold. TCAD 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 -0.1 -0.2 -0.3 -0.4 ENEXSS TCAD 2006/10/31 M. Hazumi (KEK) 20 -10 0 +10 Back bias (V) VB (V) 16 12 8 4 0 -4 -8 -12 -20 -16 V -20 Measurement Threshold voltage (V) Back Gate +20 4 Back gate effect: mitigation with p+ implants distance (D) (40 – 2 mm) NMOS BOX (200nm) (5 mm wide P+, 1 x 1020 cm-3) Bulk: N- (~700ohm cm, 6 x 10 12 cm-3) 350mm p+ implant (0V) for I/O buffer Threshold voltage D Vth (V) 0.5 0.4 2m 0.3 5m 0.2 6m Measurement (10MHz clock) Out 10m 0 50 100 20m 30m 40m -0.2 -0.3 2006/10/31 Back bias = 40V 7m 0.1 -0.1 0 MPW06 V_B (V) Back bias M. Hazumi (KEK) In Much improved ! 5 Circuit-sensor crosstalk Signals in the circuitry very close to the sensor may inject noise to the sensor. Input OK for charge-integrated device. Need some care for other cases 2006/10/31 M. Hazumi (KEK) 6 Implantation parameters Find the best ion and beam energy to achieve the highest breakdown voltage (vital important for full depletion) Example 1) Ion #2 Ion #1 2mm Vbreak (V) = +88.5V Vbreak Breakdown voltage (v) Example 2) 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 = +102.4V • “Deeper” implantation mitigates impact ionization (II) and results in a higher breakdown voltage. Vbreak (V) • ~20% improvement expected by doing both. 0 2006/10/31 50 100 150 200 N+ implantation energy (KeV) M. Hazumi (KEK) 7 Test structure (strip sensor) MPW06 Standard New Measurement ~20% improvement observed 2006/10/31 M. Hazumi (KEK) 8 Guard ring design Better guard ring design also helpful to improve breakdown voltage. SOI pixel detector ... ... Pixels MPW06 1 guard + 1bias VSS Ring I/O MPW06 2 guards + 1bias Bias Ring Guard Ring 20V at the back side 100000 Bias Ring edge E [V/cm] 80000 1 guard ring (MPW06) 2 guard rings (next submission) 60000 40000 20000 Bias 2006/10/31 0 10 Guard Guard 20 An additional guard ring is effective to reduce the electric field concentration. 30 40 M. Hazumi (KEK) d [um] 9 Pixel layout A For digital readout, charge sharing curve at the cell boundary should be as steep as possible. cell A B cell B Note that in our design there are 4 p+ implants in one cell connected in the readout. MIP-like charge injection with TCAD for the 3 layouts shown below x ① 0 5 4 ② ③ 3 2 2006/10/31 10 20 15 +:① +:② +:③ [mm] Narrower gap b/w two cells (③) slightly better. 16 17 M. Hazumi (KEK) 10 x Summary • Back gate effect largely mitigated with additional p+ implants near the circuitry. • Circuit-sensor crosstalk is not an issue for digital pixel readout with charge integration. • Higher breakdown voltage with improved implantation parameters (~20% achieved) • Additional guard ring can reduce the electric field by factor ~2. • Implantation gap b/w two cells should be minimized (present design seems close to the best) • Good prospects for thinned fully-depleted SOI pixel ! 2006/10/31 M. Hazumi (KEK) 11