Transcript Slide 1
KLINIČKE OCJENSKE LJESTVICE Ivan Bakran DOKTORSKI STUDIJ MF, 2006. POŽELJNA SVOJSTVA OCJENSKIH LJESTVICA 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. Jednostavnost Brzina ispunjavanja Lakoća ispunjavanja Jednostavna interpretacija Brza interpretacija lakoća interpretacije Osjetljivost za promjene izazvane određenim zahvatom Neosjetljivost na interferiranje Mala učestalost lažno pozitivnih odgovora Mala učestalost lažno negativnih odgovora Opetovano korištenje bez učinka utreniranosti Reproducibilnost rezultata Validnost rezultata Interpretacija korelira sa drugim kliničkim parametrima Ocjenske ljestvice moraju biti validirane, tj. točne i precizne Validacija: a) b) c) d) e) f) g) lažno pozitivni/lažno negativni rezultati usporedba sa zlatnim standardom (idealno) prihvatljivost izvodivost reproducibilnost konzistentnost aplikabilnost Interna validnost = stupanj isključenja drugačijeg tumačenja rezultata Eksterna validnost = mogućnost generaliziranja rezultata (ekstrapoliranje) PRIMJERI VREDNOVANJA U KLINIČKIM OCJENSKIM LJESTVICAMA A. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 B. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Not at all ____ Very little _____ A little ______ Mildly ______ Moderately _____ Quite a bit _____ Distrinctly _____ Markedly _____ D. Extremely _____ Not assessed Normal, not at all ____ Borderline ____ Mildly _____ Moderately ____ Markedly _____ Severely ____ Among the most severely ______ C. 0 = Absent 1 = Slightly present or a suspicion of its presence 2 = Clearly noticable but mild and occurs not more than ___per _____ 3 = Clearly present and occurs from ____ to ____ times per _____ 4 = Definitely present and frequent 5 = Continuous and gross 0 = Absent 1 = Rarely present (occurs less than _____ times per ____) 2 = Occasionally present (occurs ____to ___ times per _____) 3 = Often present (occurs ____ to ___times per ____) 4 = Always or almost always present (occurs more than ____ times per ____ or continually) ZAVRŠNI CILJEVI U OCJENI DJELOTVORNOSTI LIJEKA 1. Vrijeme do poboljšanja važnog parametra u dogovorenom postotku (npr. 75%, 100%) 2. Vrijeme do obnavljanja simptoma nakon prekida liječenja 3. Vrijeme do nove epizode bolesti tijekom liječenja 4. Stupanj obnavljanja simptoma nakon prekida liječenja 5. Trajanje poboljšanja tijekom terapije održavanja 6. Veličina poboljšanja u fiksnom trenutku (npr. nakon 1 tjedna ili 1 mjeseca) nakon početka terapije 7. Osjetljiv i specifičan dijagnostički parametar (npr. ejekcijska frakcija, integrirana površina ispod krivulje, dp/dt) 8. Osjetljiv i specifičan subjektivni parametar 9. Kvaliteta života 10. Smrtnost CILJEVI FARMAKOEKONOMSKIH ISTRAŽIVANJA 1. Cost-benefit (lijek X vs. drugi lijekovi ili 2. Cost-utility (najjeftiniji lijek; u artificijalnim jedinicama, npr. kvalitetno trajanje života) 3. Cost-effectiveness (najjeftiniji lijek; u smislenim jedinicama, npr. spašeni životi) 4. Cost-of-illness (cijena neliječene bolesti) 5. Cost-minimization (najjeftiniji način za isti terapijski učinak) 6. Quality of life (troškovi i financijska korist za pojedinca te subjektivna procjena važnosti tog troška) BIHEVIORALNE OCJENSKE LJESTVICE U ODRASLIH* Ljestvica 1. Anxiety Status Inventory (ASI) 2. Beck Depression Inventory (Beck) 3. Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) 4. Carroll Depression Scale 5. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) 6. Clyde Mood Scale 7. Covi Anxiety Scale 8. Crichton Geriatric Rating Scale 9. Depression Status Inventory (DSI) 10. Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA) 11. Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) 12. Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL) 13. Inpatient Multidimensional Psychiatric Scale (IMPS) 14. Nurses Observation Scale for Inpatient Evaluation (NOSIE) 15. Plutchik Geriatric Rating Scale (PLUT) 16. Profile of Mood States (POMS) 17. Sandoz Clinical Assessment – Geriatric 18. Self-Report Symptom Inventory (SCL-90) 19. Wittenborn Psychiatric Rating Scale (WITT) 20. Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) 21. Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) * ECDEV Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology, Guy, 1976 Ispunjava Liječnik Bolesnik X X X X or X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X POMS (Profile of Mood States) Dolje su navedene riječi koje opisuju ljudske osjećaje. Molimo Vas da svaku od njih pažljivo pročitate. Zatim križićem ispunite odgovarajuću kućicu ispod odgovora na desnoj strani koji najbolje opisuje KAKO STE SE OSJEĆALI PROTEKLOG TJEDNA UKLJUČUJUĆI DANAŠNJI DAN. nimalo malo umjereno poprilično izrazito Simptomi (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) 1. Prijazno 2. Napeto 3. Ljutito 4. Iznošeno 5. Nesretno 6. Bistre glave 7. Živahno 8. Zbunjeno 9. Žalim zbog učinjenog 10. Potreseno 11. Ravnodušno 12. Zlovoljno 13. Uviđavno 14. Tužno 15. Aktivno 16. Na rubu 17. Čangrizavo 18. Potišteno 19. Energično 20. Uspaničeno 21. Beznadno 22. Opušteno LARS (Line Analogue Rating Scale) Molim Vas da okomitom crticom () na skali označite kako se osjećate ovog trenutka za navedene simptome: Više tjeskobno Manje tjeskobno Manje umorno Više umorno Manje sretno Više sretno Više opušteno Manje opušteno Manje pospano Više pospano Manje ošamućeno Više ošamućeno Manje nespretno Više nespretno Više na oprezu Manje na oprezu Manje energično Više energično Više tužno Manje tužno Više depresivno Manje depresivno IZVRŠENJE SVAKODNEVNIH ZADATAKA (182 starije osobe)* 1. Priprema lakih obroka 2. Oblačenje i svlačenje 3. Pranje posuđa 4. Kupanje ili tuširanje 5. Pospremanje kreveta 6. Uobičajena kupovina 7. Pranje veša 8. Kuhanje 9. Ustajanje iz stolca 10.Čišćenje sa usisivačem prašine 11.Rezanje nokta na nožnom palcu 12.Uspinjanje i silaženje stepenicama Lako (1) % 93 87 89 79 73 75 78 76 64 Poteško (2) % 5 13 7 19 20 15 12 14 26 Jako teško Ne radim/ne mogu (3) (4) X % % 2 0 1,08 1 0 1,14 2 2 1,18 2 1 1,24 2 6 1,40 4 6 1,40 2 9 1,41 2 8 1,42 9 1 1,47 59 21 7 12 1,72 46 35 7 13 1,87 40 32 13 15 2,03 * Kempen GIJM et al. Hierarchical structure in ADL and IADL: analytical assumptions and applications for clinicians and researchers. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:1299. COPD Variable 0 Breathlessness Cough No cough Sputum production Sputum colour None Colourless 1 2 3 4 5 Not breathless at rest or on exertion Not breathless at rest, but breathless on moderate exertion (eg, walking quickly) Not breathless at rest but breathless on mild exertion (eg, walking on the level) Not breathless at rest but breathless on minimal exertion (eg, getting washed) Breathless at rest Mild cough (ie, some, mostly morning) Moderate cough (ei, some morning and evening) Severe cough .. .. Mild sputum production (ie, normal amount) Moderate sputum production (ie, >normal, ≤twice normal amount) Severe sputum production (ie >twice normal amount) .. .. White/grey Light yellow Dark yellow/green .. .. Symptom scores recorded in daily record cards COMMUNITY – ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA PATIENT-RISK ASSESMENT (N Engl J Med 1997;336:243-250) SCORING SYSTEM Patient Characteristics Points Assigned Demographic Factors Age: Males.........................................................Age (in years) Age: Females...............................................Age (in years) -10 Nursing-home resident......................................................+10 Comorbid Diseases Neoplastic disease............................................................+30 Liver disease....................................................................+20 Congestive heart failure....................................................+10 Cerebrovascular disease....................................................+10 Renal disease...................................................................+10 COMMUNITY – ACQUIRED PNEUMONIA PATIENT-RISK ASSESMENT (N Engl J Med 1997;336:243-250) Physical Examination Findings Altered mental status........................................................+20 Pulse ≥ 125/BPM..............................................................+10 Respiratory rate ≥ 30/min.................................................+20 Systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg...................................+20 Temperature <35°C (95°F) or ≥ 40°C (104°F)...................+15 Laboratory Findings Hematocrit < 30%............................................................+30 pH <7.35.........................................................................+30 Blood urea nitrogen >10.7 mmol/L....................................+20 Sodium <130 mEq/L.........................................................+20 Glucose >13.9 mmol/L......................................................+10 PO2 <60 mmHg................................................................+10 Pleural effusion.................................................................+10 STRATIFICATION OF RISK SCORE Risk Low Moderate High Risk Class I II III IV V Based On Algorithm ≤ 70 total points 71-90 total points 91-130 total points > 130 total points Tablica 2. Anketa o nastavi* Sadržaj mora biti “važan” po stručnoj ocjeni 1----2----3----4----5 x=3.15 Sadržaj mora biti “potreban” po ocjeni slušatelja Bolja je općenita i temeljna tematika 1----2----3----4----5 x=4.21 Bolja je primjenjena i konkretna tematika Jednosmjerna nastava 1----2----3----4----5 x=4.46 Interaktivna nastava Predavanja i pokazi 1----2----3----4----5 x=4.26 Seminari i vježbe, rješavanje problema Brojno slušateljstvo 1----2----3----4----5 x=4.79 Male grupe Prisilno sudjelovanje 1----2----3----4----5 x=4.22 Dobrovoljno sudjelovanje Provjera prisutnosti 1----2----3----4----5 x=3.87 Ispit stečenog znanja “Lagodna” atmosfera bez 1----2----3----4----5 “Ugodna” atmosfera zbog obveza x=3.27 novih iskustava * studenti medicine, 7. semestar, zadnji dan turnusa (14.1.2000.) Programme Evaluation 2 / 7 Room Tejo: Plenary Session 1 “Advances in Immunopathology” Activity endorsed by EAACI CME Accreditation Council 5 Excellent Good Average Poor Very Poor Unsatis -factory 1. Organisational and logical level of the presentations 2. Ability of speakers to keep my interest during the session 3. Relevance of the lectures to my clinical practice and/or research 4. The ability of speakers to provoke critical thoughts on the subject 5. Contribution to my current knowledge in the subject by the lectures 6. The novelty of the contents 7. Possible impact on my daily practice 8. The quality of handouts, slides and/or other material 9. Meeting room facilities 10.The overall value of this session as a learning experience SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU STUDENTSKA ANKETA - Ovim upitnikom možete utjecati na poboljšanje i unapređenje nastave, na uočavanje eventualnih problema i slabosti koje se javljaju u njenoj izvedbi. - Molimo Vas da na navedena pitanja odgovorite u cijelosti, iskreno, objektivno, samostalno i dobronamjerno. - Kako bi anketni listić bio važeći molimo da ga ispunite ispravno: x DOBRO, . LOŠE Naziv kolegija_____________________Akad.god._____________Semestar______Broj kredita1______________ Nastavnik_______________________________________________ Broj studenata (kolegij upisalo)______Broj studenata (anketu ispunilo)______ Ovaj red ispunjava administracija! 1. Vaša prisutnost predavanjima2 75-100% 50-75% 25-50% 0-25% 2. Molimo ocijenite nastavnika prema predloženim značajkama: Pitanja a) Pripremljenost predavanja b) Sposobnost jasnog izlaganja gradiva c) Sustavnost izlaganja d) Zanimljivost i suvremenost predavanja e) Spremnost na raspravu f) Poticanje studenata na raspravu i rad g) Povezivanje teorije i prakse h) Odnos nastavnika prema studentu i) Usklađenost svih oblika nastave (predavanja, seminari, vježbe) j) Ocjena rada nastavnika u cjelini 1 2 3 4 5 SVEUČILIŠTE U ZAGREBU STUDENTSKA ANKETA (nastavak) 3. Jesu li predavanja bila redovita i točno prema rasporedu? Redovito i točno Redovito sa zadašnjenjem Neredovito Izrazito neredovito 4. Pokrivenost gradiva literaturom: odlična dovoljna nedovoljna 5. Biste li ovaj kolegij i ovog nastavnika preporučili i drugim studentima? Da u svakom slučaju Vjerojatno da Vjerojatno ne Ne, ni u kom slučaju 6. Molimo, navedite Vaše dodatne primjedbe, zapažanja i prijedloge na poleđini ovog listića. Hvala na vremenu koje ste posvetili ovoj anket, te na iskazanoj pomoći i suradnji. 1 Prije uvođenja kreditnog sustava molimo da navedete broj nastavnih sati prema prihvaćenom planu. 2 Anketni list za predavanja ispunjava se izdvojeno od anketnog listića za seminare i vježbe. Za seminar i vježbe upisuje se i asistent. ASTHMA CONTROL QUESTIONNAIRE PATIENT ID _______________ DATE ____________________ Page 1 of 2 Please answer questions Circle the number of the response that best describes how you have been during the past week 1. On average, during the past week, how often were you woken by your asthma during the night? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Never Hardly ever A few times Several times Many times A great many times Unable to sleep because of asthma 2. On average, during the past week, how bad were your asthma symptoms when you wake up in the morning? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 No symptoms Very mild symptoms Mild symptoms Moderate symptoms Quite severe symptoms Severe symptoms Very severe symptoms 3. In general, during the past week how limited were you in your daily activities because of your asthma? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Not limited at all Very slightly limited Slightly limited Moderately limited Very limited Extremely limited Totaly limited 4. In general, during the past week, how much shortness of breath did you experience because of your asthma? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 None A very little A little A moderate amount Quite a lot A great deal A very great deal ASTHMA CONTROL QUESTIONNAIRE PATIENT ID _______________ DATE ____________________ Page 2 of 2 5. In general, during the past week, how much of the time did you wheeze? 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Not at all Hardly any of the time A little of the time A moderate amount of the time A lot of the time Most of the time All the time 6. On average, during the past week, how many pufs/inhalations of short-acting bronchodilator (eg. Ventolin/Bricanyl) have you used each day) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 None 1-2 puffs/inhalations most days 3-4 puffs/inhalations most days 5-8 puffs/inhalations most days 9-12 puffs/inhalations most days 13-18 puffs/inhalations most days More than 18 puffs/inhalations most days If you are not sure how to answer this question, please ask for help) 7. FEV1 pre-bronchodilator: FEV1 predicted: FEV1 % predicted: ........................ (Record actual values on the dotted lines and score the FEV1 % predicted in the next column) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 > 85% predicted 95 – 90% 89 – 80% 79 – 70% 69 – 60% 59 – 50% < 50% predicted