Transcript Slide 1

Millennium Project - South East Europe Node
Conte
Miran Gajsek &
Blaž Golob
Content of presentation
-
The MP SEE Node short Report
From Foresight to Planning
BRICS and/or PIGS
Squaring the (development) circle
Foresighting and planning a city futures: The Ljubljana Forum – MP
node network is working
Ljubljana Forum & European nodes meeting
The MP SEE Node short report
- Cegd conference: Renaissance of Information Society
PPP model, with Microsoft, J.C.Glenn. (Slovenia,
Portorož, Oct. 2010)
- Bled Forum on Europe: Governance of Fear
and Prosperity, 12th Foresight conference / J.C.Glenn,
J. Cordeiro, Slovenia, Bled, March 2011)
-SEE Node member P. Sicherl contributed to MP
knowledge pool with: Presentation of indicators with Time
Distance method.
- SEE Node provided input to the Latin America Study
2030.
- CEGD and Municipality of Ljubljana are organising the
Ljubljana Forum, (13-14 October 2011)
CeGD 7 ePillars Model of Single Information
Society
From Foresight to Planning
• Foresight, (e.g. Millenium Project);
• Forecast, (e.g. THE NEXT 100 Years, a forecast
for the 21st CENTURY, George Friedman,
STRATFOR);
• Programming, (European Commission, DG
Regio; State and/or Regional development
programmes; 2007-2013, 2014-2020; The
instrument for a Social, Economic and Territorial
Cohesion);
• Planning, (Regional Planning, Spatial Planning,
Town Planning; Economic Planning; Social
Planning)
Alternative: BRICS or PIGS
• Brasil, (The Pluriannual Plan - PPA; 2004-2007 Plan is commited to
macroeconomic stability preservation)
• Russia, (2004, State has set up new instruments in order to play a
more active role in guiding economic development: mobilisation of
resources in national projects, special economic zones, public
investment fund); Russia goes back to Soviet five-years plan?
Pravda, 3 june 2011.
• India, (Eleventh Five Year Plan 2007-2012; Science and technology:
To identify thrust aras for the XIth Five Year Plan and suggest their
inter-se priorities)
• China, (Five Years Plan – FYP; the recent is 2011-2015; the 20012005 FYP currenty resembles a very detailed public investment plan
rather than a national strategic plan with a clear vision and
coordinated strategic objectives);
• SouthAfrican Republic
Squaring the (Development) Circle
Who/How
_________
When/Whe
re
Developer
Local
Authority
3. The Tennessee Valley Authority
(the TVA)
• In the USA the crisis reached its peak in 1929. In 1933 the
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was established, (The Tennessee
Valley Act, 18 May 1933). TVA was one of the main instruments of
the president Theodore Roosevelt’s New Deal. Its functions were:
planning and management of the Tennessee river basin, planning
and construction of river dams etc. TVA is still in function.
• After the second World war President Truman proposed that the TVA
should have the sister in and Euphrates Valley Authority,
• In the year 1953 Bogumil Vošnjak, the Slovene Diplomat, Proffessor
and Writer of many books on European politics proposed the
Danube Valley Authority. (World Affairs, Vol. 116, No.3, Fall 1953).
4. The Danube Strategy
and the case of Slovenia
• Two EU macroregional strategies: European Union
Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (adopted in 2009) and
the Danube Strategy (adopted in spring 2011) could
represent the tool for a social, economic and teritorial
cohesion in EU. Why?
• The macroregion could represent the (teritorial and
functional) common denominator of the the existing EU
policies and EU funds
4. The Danube Strategy and the case of Slovenia
Railway-logistics network on V. TEN-T corridor
• 3.Pier – Port of Koper
• Logistics mastering zones (Koper, Sežana, Divača, Postojna
(Logatec), Ljubljana, Celje, Maribor, Dolga vas)
• Economic zones (Coastal zone, Notranjska, Ljubljana, Mining zone,
Žalec – Celje, Maribor, Pomurje (Murska Sobota)
• Link to X. TEN-T corridor (Ljubljana, Jože Pučnik Airport)
+
• Sedež multinacionalnega upravljavskega telesa v Ljubljani
4. The Danube Strategy and the case of Slovenia
Touristic-energy-water transverzala
• Sava: Kranjska gora-...-Brežice
• Drava: Dravograd – Celje, Dravograd – Maribor
• Mura: Gornja Radgona – Lendava
+
Transnational distributory electrical power grid (400 kV)
Pipeline
Gas pipeline – South Stream
4. The Danube Strategy and the case of Slovenia
Settlements-university network
on development axes with public transport transfer system
•
•
•
•
•
V. TEN-T corridor (Jesenice – Brežice)
X. TEN-T corridor (Jesenice – Ljubljana – Brežice; Maribor – Ptuj)
3. Development axis:
 Carinthia
 Saleška Valley
 Vitanje – Celje – Laško
 Šentjur – Posotelje
Associate aces:
 Soča corridor ((Ajdovščina) Nova Gorica – Tolmin (Most na Soči – Kobarid))
 Celtica (Logatec – Idrija – Tolmin (Ajdovščina))
Centres of excellence : Ljubljana, Maribor, Nova Gorica, Kranj, Novo mesto, Celje, Bled,
Piran
4. The Danube Strategy and the case of Slovenia
‘‘Forgoten pockets‘‘ – opportunities for settlement, tourism
and eco-farming, linked to regional public transport,
local enterprise zones and regional produce centres
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Ribnica – Kočevje
Idrija
Trbovlje – Zagorje – Hrastnik
Goričko
Suha Krajina
Bela Krajina
Spa-basin Posotelje – Ptuj – Prekmurje (Balaton)
5. Conclusions
1. The Danube strategy covers 8 EU countries (Germany, Austria,
Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Bulgaria and
Romania) and 6 non-EU countries (Croatia, Serbia, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Montenegro, Ukraine and Moldova).
2. Between 90.0 and 100.0 billions (!) of Euros is the amount of money of
the existing EU founds for the 8 EU countries inside Danube strategy
for the programming period 2007-2013. How to alocate this amount of
money?
3. The European Commission, the 8 member countries and 6 non-EU
countries have to establish as soon as possible the Danube strategy
authority.
4. The EU Commission should establish the authorities for the European
macro regions; e.g. Adriatic space, Alpine space ….
5. The EU macro regional authorities do represent an instrument for
european cohesion policy.
Conclusion & contact
• www.cegd.eu
• www.bled-forum.org