Transcript (PDF)

Advanced AHW
Diagnostics
Ryan D. Torn, Univ. Albany SUNY
Chris Davis, NCAR
• AHW Assimilation System Diagnostics
• AHW Forecast Diagnostics
• Ready-to-go HWRF Diagnostics
Pressure Tendency
• Measure of the
imbalance in initial
conditions
• Computed using
high-frequency
model output. Files
processed using
short fortran
program that writes
netcdf tendency file.
• Plotted via NCL
Observation Verification
• Large-scale model
errors and biases
• Windowing by region
can demonstrate more
detailed model bias
information
• Computed within AHW
assimilation system,
could extend to HWRF
if grids are made
available
• NCL or Matlab plotting
Near-TC Verification
• Compute errors relative to
obs. near TC. Primarily
for diagnosing near-storm
environmental errors
• Done from fortran
program that windows
observations based on
distance to TC
• Aggregation using fortran
program
Inner-Core Verification
Wind Speed
Temperature
Prior
Analysis
Obs.
• Comparison against aircraft and dropsonde obs. in vortex-relative space.
Eliminates position-related errors.
• Computed via fortran program that reads WRF files and obs. from DA
system and writes model estimates at observation locations.
• Plotting with Matlab, with transition to NCL
Lagrangian Diagnostics
Metrics: circulation, thickness, humidity, vertical shear,
divergence, precipitation, average winds
• Used extensively
during PREDICT
to evaluate
processes that
lead to genesis
• Each Lagrangian
metric is
computed using a
separate fortran
program, could be
merged into single
application
• Plotting via NCL
Histogram Verification
• Shows conditional biases
• In assimilation system,
computed via separate
fortran program,
aggregated via Matlab
script, output as netcdf
• AHW forecasts have allin-one fortran program
• Calculations can include
equitable threat scores
• Plotting accomplished via
Matlab with transition to
NCL
Davis et al. 2010, WAF
Climatology Comparisons
• Shows whether the model
can replicate the
observed distribution of a
quantity, shows
systematic biases
• Easy to compute once
you have quantities
Davis et al. 2010, WAF
Environment Shear
Remove effect of storm from estimate of vertical shear between two levels (subscripts 1
and 2) by removing vertical difference of storm-related vorticity (z) and divergence (d)
 z  z for r  r0 
2 ( 2  1 )   2 1
;
0
r

r
0

 2  1  0 on lateral boundaries
 d  d for r  r0 
2 (  2  1 )   2 1
;
0
r

r
0

 2  1  0 on lateral boundaries
v  kˆ ( 2  1 ); v  (  2  1 )
200 mb – 900 mb
wind difference
(and 900 mb
relative vorticity):
EPAC developing
composite
venv  v2  v1  v  v
Due to
storm
200 mb – 900 mb
wind difference
with storm
removed:
EPAC developing
composite
Davis et al., 2008: MWR
HWRF Histograms
• Convert ATCF to netcdf
• Histogram constructed via Matlab
• Plotting either via Matlab or NCL
HWRF Histograms
• Convert ATCF to netcdf
• Histogram constructed via Matlab
• Plotting either via Matlab or NCL
Future Diagnostics
• H*WIND comparisons (either RMS
difference or quadrant-by-quadrant fraction
coverage, similar to Marchok calculation)