Transcript Paper presentation and summary

CAP6135: Malware and Software
Vulnerability Analysis
Paper Presentation and
Summary
Cliff Zou
Spring 2013
Candidate Paper List

Candidate Papers for the later half of the class is posted
at:

http://www.cs.ucf.edu/~czou/CAP6135/notes.html
2
Paper Presentation – Face-to-Face Students


For face-to-face session students only
Each class will have two students present two
papers


Each presentation lasts around 30 minutes
The teacher will give a summary at the end of lecture
if we still have time
3
Paper Presentation – Face-to-Face Students


Each student only needs to do ONE paper
presentation!
Student in-class participation is counted



Ask questions, answer questions, give comments…
The teacher will count it!
If you cannot come to classroom, email the teacher
beforehand with reasons
4
Presentation Format

First page:




Show the paper title, authors, affiliations, published
conference/journal name
Presenter name
Give acknowledgement if you reuse any content from
other places besides the paper (even from the authors’
slides)
Three pages at the end of presentation:

Contribution: one page


Weakness: one page


The major contribution(s) of this paper
What weaknesses you can think of this paper?
Improvement: one page

How do you think to improve/extend the research in the paper?
5
Paper Summary


For online video streaming students only
Submit paper summary twice



Submit summary through Canvas
About once in two and a half week
I will put an announcement on Canvas one week before the due
date



Summarize one paper in each paper review assignment


So pay attention to announcement!
Check Canvas at least once per week!
You can pick any one paper you want to summarize
Each paper’s summary needs to be at least two pages

Single column, single spaced, 12 point fonts
6
Summary Format

Summary:

Summarize what this paper is about?




Do not try to copy paper’s abstract or conclusion
Should be more technical and detailed than paper’s abstract



You can treat it as ‘extended abstract’
Use your own words
Weakness:



Central ideas/contributions
Briefly describe how the authors show/verify their claims
Point out what the possible weaknesses exist in the paper
Use your own words, do not copy from the paper
Your thoughts:



Good? Bad? Interested? Boring?
Why do you think the paper is good or bad?
How to improve? Do you have a new idea on better work?
7
Solving Grading Bias Issue

Online session students and face-to-face session
students may get different grade for this section, how to
be fair?



I will make sure the average score for both sessions’ students in
this portion is equal to each other
For example, if the average score of online students in this
portion is 90, the average score of face-to-face students in this
portion is 80, then:
All online students’ score in this portion will be multiplied with
8/9
8