Slides S802.16j-08/050

Download Report

Transcript Slides S802.16j-08/050

Maximum number of hops for centralized scheduling mode
IEEE 802.16 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9)
Document Number:
IEEE 802.16j-08/050
Date Submitted: 2008-01-23
Source:
Yuefeng Zhou
NEC
Voice:
E-mail:
+44 20 87523460
[email protected]
IEEE 802.16 Session #53, Levi, Finland
Base Contribution:
None
Purpose:
For the discussion of the Maximum number of hops for centralized scheduling mode
Notice:
This document does not represent the agreed views of the IEEE 802.16 Working Group or any of its subgroups. It represents only the views of the participants listed in
the “Source(s)” field above. It is offered as a basis for discussion. It is not binding on the contributor(s), who reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material
contained herein.
Release:
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an
IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s
sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this
contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.16.
Patent Policy:
The contributor is familiar with the IEEE-SA Patent Policy and Procedures:
<http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sect6-7.html#6> and <http://standards.ieee.org/guides/opman/sect6.html#6.3>.
Further information is located at <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat/pat-material.html> and <http://standards.ieee.org/board/pat >.2
1
Maximum number of hops for centralized scheduling mode
As defined in the standard draft, P802.16j/D2, the centralized
scheduling is the mode of operation applicable to multihop relay
where an MR-BS determines the bandwidth allocations and
generates the corresponding MAPs (or dictates the information used
by RSs to generate their MAPs) for all access and relay links in the
MR-cell.
When increasing the number of hops, the MR-BS will have very
heavy MAP overhead, since it has to generates the MAPs for each
hop.
Maximum number of hops for centralized scheduling mode
Figure 1 shows the estimated MAP and FCH overhead for legacy
one-hop 16e system, when normal map is used. (FFT size = 1024;
DL:UL = 32:15; Assume one burst for one connection; assume UL
and DL subframe has same number of connections; 3 segmentation
70
is used)
repetition rate = 4
repetition rate =2
FCH & MAP overhead (%)
60
Fig. 1.
FCH & MAP overhead
(percentage within DL
subframe) vs. Number of
connections (CIDs) used.
50
40
30
20
10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Number of connections
8
9
10
Maximum number of hops for centralized scheduling mode
From the estimated results in Fig. 1, when number of connections is
10, by using repetition rate of 4 and normal MAPs, the overhead of
FCH and MAPs will use about 70% of the whole DL subframe! In
16j with centralized scheduler mode, when number of hops is
bigger, the MR-BS will consume much bigger FCH&MAP
overhead. For example, when number of hops is 3, averagely, only
two connections could be supported by each RS and MR-BS to
make sure the MR-BS has enough resource to allocate all FCH and
MAPs. Obviously, it is not efficient to use centralized scheduling
mode when number of hops is big, e.g. > 2.