Flexible Clinical Experiences (FCE) AY2014-2015 Annual Report to the CCE Curriculum Committee
Download ReportTranscript Flexible Clinical Experiences (FCE) AY2014-2015 Annual Report to the CCE Curriculum Committee
Flexible Clinical Experiences (FCE) AY1415: Review Samir Malkani MD Colleen Burnham MBA December 14, 2015 FCE Program Description • Four, one-week electives, embedded in the third year Core Clinical Experiences curriculum • Provides opportunity for individual exploration in a broad range of specialties related to healthcare • Aims to provide exposure to areas not covered by the core curriculum. • Student driven, to allow for career exploration and to discover one’s interests Specific Program Objectives 1. 2. 3. 4. Career exploration and development Exposure to evolving and cutting-edge branches of medicine not covered in the core curriculum Provide opportunity to work with recognized experts in medicine and allied sciences Exposure to novel concepts and systems of care Outline • Student Evaluation Data • What worked particularly well... • Implementation of recommendations made in AY1314 for program improvement – Data where applicable • Proposed changes • Concerns for committee consideration Student Evaluation Data 2014-2015 What worked particularly well… • The wide variety of faculty designed offerings spanning all departments in the medical school • Increase in number and variety of student designed experiences • All students have completed the experiences successfully and been granted credit Hosting Department AY1213 AY1314 AY1415 Medicine 242 218 170 159 Family Medicine & Community Health 89 112 34 131 Pediatrics 58 105 76 112 Surgery 111 93 39 71 Radiology 22 22 21 53 Anesthesiology 74 75 55 48 Obstetrics & Gynecology 67 62 53 47 Pathology 30 38 39 40 Orthopedics & Physical Rehabilitation 68 103 24 35 Psychiatry 53 51 33 34 Neurology 23 9 15 18 Emergency Medicine 49 46 12 12 Radiation Oncology 28 7 7 12 Ophthalmology 9 8 11 10 Urology 2 11 9 8 Program in Molecular Medicine 0 4 0 3 Quantitative Health Sciences 0 0 3 1 Biochemistry & Molecular Pharmacology 0 0 0 0 Cancer Biology 1 0 0 0 Cell Biology 0 4 0 0 Microbiology & Physiology Systems 0 0 0 0 Neurobiology 0 0 0 0 Otolaryngology 0 2 0 0 0 926 0 970 34 635 TBD (student design) Question 1: Broad Range of Specialties and Offerings AY1516* 0 794 Question 1: Wide variety of course offerings • Wide variety of pre-designed experiences across all disciplines of medicine AY1213: 84 pre-designed & 84 student designed across 15 departments* AY1314: 89 pre-designed & 116 student designed across 18 departments* AY1415: 82 pre-designed & 135 student designed across 22 departments* AY1516: 90 pre-designed & 104 student designed (so far) across 22 departments! • Careers in fields not traditionally related to medicine – – – – Office of General Counsel (legal needs of the Umass Medical Center) Health Insurance Policy AGILE information technology management Global Health Policy *the EPC identifies 22 formal departments; Urology added AY1415 Question 1: wide variety of course offerings Student Design FCEs since program implementation 153 (32%) 120 (25%) 114 (21%)* 91 (18%) AY1213 AY1314 AY1415 *6 FE terms into the 10 term academic year Question 1: Increase in student designed experiences AY1516 How improvement suggestions were implemented Proposed change #1 Outcome EVOS: student preference and scheduling Enrollment process partially improved; however, PSCS not conducive environment for all hoped for changes (ie, schedule changes continue to be processed by hand) Goal was to increase automation of the enrollment process PSCS (student) schedule change management Program management: enrollment & grades Reduced redundancy in enrollment & grading processes IREA direct access to enrollment data (SharePoint) Reduced OSA involvement Bulk/batch upload enrollment (FCE program) Reduced registrar office work Program access to input grades to PSCS How improvement suggestions were implemented Proposed change #2 Outcomes Faculty and Student Focus Groups. Obtain student feedback on how well course meets its objectives Faculty feedback re: results & rewards Poor attendance at Student Focus group in Spring 2015 Pursuing scheduling focus group on interstitial day o We have been in touch with Julie Jonassen and Mary Philbin Faculty Focus group in Retreat format scheduled for January 8, 2016 o Good response (26) faculty members are scheduled to attend and share their feedback Implemented program evaluation in addition to course and faculty evaluations to get student feedback regarding four program objectives. o 113 students have provided feedback- results are very encouraging o Curriculum Development Summer student administered surveys to pre-clinical students to analyze program expectations (K. Li) o A fourth year student analyzed the impact of the FCE in preparing students for a career in surgical specialties (D. Perry) How improvement suggestions were implemented Proposed change #3 Outcomes Increase Faculty We were able to increase faculty offered experiences Recruitment to increase the number of offered Direct mailing to faculty courses (experiences) one on one communication FMCH retreat attendance Student design faculty staying with the program Data for Faculty Recruitment shown previously in “what worked well…” Assessment of how the FCE Program meets the objective: Career Exploration and Development To formally assess how well the FCE meets this objective we… • Surveyed classes of 2014 - 2016 • Compared FCEs completed with residency match • Developed End of Year Program Evaluation (specifically for this objective) • Summer Curriculum Development Student to continue work Proposed Change #2: Student feedback on course objectives Survey #1: Classes of 2014-2016 (Perry, 2015) How important were the following experiences in deciding to pursue the field you are in or going in to? Pre-medical experience 10% Pre-clinical medical school experience 10% 3rd year core clerkship rotation 63% 3rd year surgery clerkship specialty… 69% 3rd year Flexible Clinical… 37% 4th year rotation or sub-internship other (specify below) 63% 6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Most important Perry, 2015 Proposed Change # 2: student feedback on course objectives Flexible Clinical Experiences as career decision factor Surgeons 1 2 10 No impact on my decision Non-Surgeons 7 19 9 Somewhat important 4 Most important Core 6 Non-Core 17 2 0% 4 20% 11 2 80% 100% 8 40% 60% Perry, 2015 Proposed Change # 2: student feedback on course objectives N/A Survey #2: Pre-FCE on career expectations Classes 2018, 2019 (n = 135) Li, 2015 Proposed Change # 2: student feedback on course objectives Survey #3 Post-FCE assessment of Career Exploration: Agree sparked interest in a new field that I am now planning to enter 55% one or more of your four FCEs helpful in career planning made me decide not to pursue a field in which I was previously interested End of Year Program Evaluation AY1415 Proposed Change # 2: student feedback on course objectives 97% 62% Objective 2: Exposure to evolving and cutting-edge branches of medicine not covered in the core curriculum 93% 7% disagree agree End of Year Program Evaluation AY1415 Proposed Change # 2: student feedback on course objectives Objective 3: Provide opportunity to work with recognized experts in medicine and allied sciences 95% 5% disagree agree End of Year Program Evaluation AY1415 Proposed Change # 2: student feedback on course objectives Objective 4: Exposure to novel concepts and systems of care 5. provided exposure to innovative experiences 4. provided exposure to novel healthcare concepts or systems of care not normally available within the core clinical experience End of Year Program Evaluation AY1415 Proposed Change # 2: student feedback on course objectives 96.56 97.39 Changes for AY2015-2016, 2016-2017 Proposed change Rationale Faculty have communicated they are not clear about the expectation of a Capstone-specific FCE Students seem to use the two FCE terms to continue work on their capstone project without a clearly defined objective specific to the FCE week Capstone FCEs frequently designed around selfstudy in the library Make changes based on the We need to respond to feedback from students and feedback obtained from the planned faculty on how well the program is working for all faculty and student sessions involved. Investigate a more streamline Current system is prone to breakdown. Over 500 process (ie, application) for record experiences each year from over 1000 slots are keeping for a program with so many manually managed, by a single person, after initial moving parts. EVOS process. Enrollment records maintained in SharePoint. (PSCS) Current enrollment flexibility allows for high number of last minute student change requests Clarify requirements for using selfdesigned FCEs for the benefit of Capstone Projects to Capstone faculty and to rising MS3s Question 3: proposed future changes Problem and concerns for committee consideration • Technology- ideas for technology solutions or software for record keeping, enrollment and grading • Ideas for experiences with recognized experts and cutting-edge and novel areas of health sciences including information technology, public health policy, global health • Increase faculty and student awareness of appropriate use of FCE time Contact FCE Program [email protected] FCE Program website http://umassmed.edu/oume/fce