Transcript 下載/瀏覽
南 台 科 技 大 學 專題討論報告 指導老師:黃振勝 姓 名:黃逸帆 學 號:M98U0207 中華民國98年12月23日 報告內容 2016/7/13 2 資料來源 Topic: Finding the most efficient DMUs in DEA: An improved integrated model Author : 1-Gholam R. Amin*, 2-M. Toloo 1 Postgraduate Engineering Center, Islamic Azad University of South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran 2 Department of Mathematics, Islamic Azad University of Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran The Source : 2016/7/13 Computers & Industrial Engineering 52 (2007) 71–77 3 大 綱 Abstract Introduction Integrated DEA model An improved integrating DEA model Conclusion 2016/7/13 4 Abstract This paper presents an improved integrated DEA model in order to detect the most efficient DMUs. The proposed integrated DEA model does not use the trial and error method in the objective function. Also, it is able to find the most efficient DMUs without solving the model n times (one linear programming (LP) for each DMU) and therefore allows the user to get faster results. It is shown that the improved integrated DEA model is always feasible and capable to rank the most efficient one. 2016/7/13 5 Introduction Data envelopment analysis (DEA) introduced by Charnes, Cooper, and Rhodes (1978) and followed by Banker, Charnes, and Cooper (1984) New applications with more variables and more complicated models are being introduced, (Emrouznejad, Tavares, & Parker, 2007).’ Yang and Kuo (2003) introduced a hierarchical DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. DEA allows each DMU to specify its own weights so as to obtain its maximum efficiency score, which may result in a relatively high number of efficient DMUs and avoid DEA to appear as a robust approach in determining the most efficient unit (Doyle & Green, 1994). 2016/7/13 6 Integrated DEA model In the DEA literature the non-Archimedean e has introduced for removing some difficulties. There are two main approaches, the two phase method, Cooper et al. (2006) Amin and Toloo (2004) introduced a polynomial time algorithm, Epsilon algorithm, to find a suitable nonArchimedean which assures to remove the weak efficient DMUs from the list of efficient DMUs. The Epsilon algorithm is applied for Table 1 and concludes the assurance value e0 = 2.64852*10-5. 2016/7/13 7 Integrated DEA model 2016/7/13 8 Integrated DEA model 2016/7/13 9 Integrated DEA model An optimal value of model is ε=0.0714 2016/7/13 10 Integrated DEA model The strong efficient DMUs are DMU3, DMU5, DMU2, DMU11, DMU6, DMU1, and DMU4. The first column of Table 2 in Ertay et al. Therefore the weak efficient units DMU5 and DMU19 (Current) appeared as efficient one in the first column of Table 6. 2016/7/13 11 An improved integrating DEA model The Ertay et al. (2006) minimax DEA procedure contains a constraint regarding to specific DMUs. Therefore it needs to solve n LPs, one LP for each DMU. We propose an improved version of the presented model without the need to choose the parameter k. The model proposes as: 2016/7/13 12 An improved integrating DEA model 2016/7/13 13 An improved integrating DEA model ε* is the maximum non-Archimedean. Note that in the absence of the alternative efficient DMUs when the appropriate parameter is selected, the minimax method proposed by Ertay et al. (2006) reaches a single relative efficient DMU. Cook, Kress, and Seiford (1996) suggested theuse of maximum value for e, a non-Archimedean, in order to improve the discrimination among all the DMUs. The following model is an extended integrated version of their model: 2016/7/13 14 An improved integrating DEA model Obviously model is feasible. Let (μ*, ω*, ε*) be an optimal solution of model. Define 2016/7/13 15 An improved integrating DEA model First, we show that |J1|≧1, i. e. in any optimal solution (μ*, ω*, ε*) of model at least one of the first n constraints must be tight. 2016/7/13 16 An improved integrating DEA model Lemma1. |J1|≧1. Proof. On the contrary, assume that |J1| = 0. Consider the dual of the model shown below: 2016/7/13 17 An improved integrating DEA model The complementary slackness conditions imply that δ* = 0, where (δ *, β*, γ *, η*) is an optimal solution of the dual. So the constraints of the dual conclude that β * = 0, γ * = 0 and η * = 0, which contradicts to the last constraint of model. 2016/7/13 18 An improved integrating DEA model Lemma 2. 0 < ε* <∞ Proof. Using model , a similar manner applied in Lemma 1 completes the proof. 2016/7/13 19 Conclusion This paper started with the motivation for determining the most efficient DMUs in DEA and developed a new integrated DEA model. The merits of the proposed formulation compared with DEA-based approaches that have previously been used for finding the most efficient DMUs can be listed as follows. First, this formulation allows the computation of the efficiency scores of all DMUs by a single formulation, i.e. all DMUs are evaluated by a common set of weights. Second, it identifies the most efficient units by using fewer formulations and without the need to solve n LPs, one LP for each of DMUs. Further, the proposed integrated DEA formulation does not use the trial and error method that has been applied for finding the most efficient DMUs. Finally to illustrate the model capability it is applied to a real data set consisting of the 19 FLDs. 2016/7/13 20 參考文獻 Amin, Gholam R., & Toloo, M. (2004). A polynomial-time algorithm for finding Epsilon in DEA models. Computers and Operations Research, 31(5), 803–805. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiency in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444. 2016/7/13 21 參考文獻 Cook, W. D., Kress, M., & Seiford, L. M. (1996). Data Envelopment Analysis in the presence of both quantitative and qualitative factors. Journal of Operational Research Society, 47, 945–953. Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and its uses with DEA-Solver software and references, Springer. Doyle, J., & Green, R. (1994). Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578. 2016/7/13 22 參考文獻 Emrouznejad, A., Tavares, G., & Parker, B. (2007). A bibliography of data envelopment analysis (1978–2003). Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, in press. Ertay, T., Ruan, D., & Tuzkaya, U. R. (2006). Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Information Sciences, 176, 237–262. Li, X. B., & Reeves, G. R. (1999). A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 115, 507–517. 2016/7/13 23 參考文獻 Mehrabian, S., Jahanshahloo, G. R., Alirezaee, M. R., & Amin, Gholam R. (2000). An assurance interval for the non-Archimedean epsilon in DEA models. Operations Research, 48(2), 344–347. Yang, T., & Kuo, C. A. (2003). A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 147, 128– 136. 2016/7/13 24 心得及討論 Impression: 2016/7/13 一般的資料包絡法都只是評測出最有效率的幾個評測 單位為何,卻沒有針對這些被評測為有效率的評測單 位再做其中最有效率的分析,因此本篇針對此一問題 提出了所謂改良式的整合資料包絡法,此一方法最主 要是套入了一個non-Archimedean的概念,藉由此一方 法的參數ε達到最大,藉此找到傳統資料包絡法所評測 出的幾個最有效的評測單位中最有效率的評測單位為 何。因而能夠找出最有效率的DMU中最有效率的DMU 為何,總而言之此一改良式整合資料包絡法不但能強 化傳統資料包絡法的缺點,更能有效找出最有效率的 評測單位。 25 心得及討論 Question : 剛剛在報告中所提及的non-Archimedean的作用是什麼 呢? Answer : 2016/7/13 non-Archimedean就是所謂的非阿基米德數,是由 Cook, Kress, and Seiford 三人在1996年所提出的一個 資料包絡分析法的新概念,並利用線性規劃模式使 non-Archimedean的參數ε達到最大,藉以求出資料包 絡分析法中最有效率的評測單位。 26