Transcript Presentation - Jake Molloy’s

Step Change in Safety
Elected Safety Representative
Network
February 2nd 2011
Workforce representation
Offshore
Industry
Advisory
Committee
[OIAC]
Step Change
Leadership
Team
[SCLT]
Sub-committee –
Workforce
Involvement
Group
[WIG]
Sub-committee –
Workforce
Engagement
Group
[WEG]
Inspection Template
•
•
Heavily based on regulations
5 sections
–
–
–
–
–
•
•
•
Safety Representatives (SR’s), constituencies & election process etc
Functions and powers of SR’s
Safety committees
Duties of installation operators and owners, and employers
Time off and training
Room for comment and conclusion
Space to collect examples of good practice
Findings reported & coded using standard HSE
‘traffic light system’
Traffic Light System
Traffic Light System
Action Taken Resulting From Intervention
Compliance
Level
Outcome
Status
Activity
General
compliance
1
Partial Compliance
3
General
non-compliance
4
Enforcement Notice Served
Significant Non
Compliance
5
Court proceedings recommended
Sugnificant Non
Compliancce
6
No findings or
Verbal advice
SPC/ENF/166 format letter issued identifying breaches and
requiring action to be taken. No significant change made to
intervention plan to follow-up issues (eg follow-up via future planned
2
intervention activity)
SPC/ENF/166 format letter issued identifying breaches and
requiring action to be taken. Changes made to intervention plan to
follow-up the issues (eg additional un-planned intervention activity)
And/or Enforcement Notices considered but not served (eg EMM
dutyholder factors modified initial enforcement expectation
‘Traffic
Light’
Scope and Coverage
• Each Duty Holder (DH) at least once
• Representative sample of installations –
large / small / old / new / production / drilling / flotel / NUI etc.
• Inspections: May – October 2010
• Conclusions: December 2010
The story so far…
• 38 inspections covering 25 DH’s
• 18 inspections resulted in formal letters
addressing partial compliance
• 14 inspections resulted in verbal advice
where minor improvements would secure
full compliance
• No findings reported on 6 installations
TOPIC ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION
Platform ID
SECTION 1
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
SECTION 4
SECTION 5
Inspection
Outcome
1
2
3
2
3
1
3
2
2
1
1
1
1
1
3
3
1
3
1
1
3
4
1
3
3
2
1
3
5
2
3
4
4
4
4
6
2
2
1
1
1
2
7
2
2
2
2
1
2
8
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
1
3
3
1
2
3
11
1
1
1
2
2
2
12
2
3
3
2
3
3
13
1
2
1
2
1
2
14
1
1
1
1
1
1
15
3
2
2
3
2
3
16
3
3
1
2
3
3
17
1
3
3
1
3
3
18
1
1
1
1
1
1
19
3
1
1
3
3
3
20
3
1
1
1
3
3
21
1
3
1
2
1
3
22
2
2
2
1
2
2
23
1
2
2
2
2
2
24
1
2
2
1
2
2
TOPIC ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION
(CONTINUED)
Platform ID
SECTION 1
SECTION 2
SECTION 3
SECTION 4
SECTION 5
Inspection
Outcome
25
1
1
1
2
2
2
26
2
2
1
2
1
2
27
3
3
3
2
2
3
28
1
1
1
1
2
2
29
2
2
2
2
1
2
30
1
1
2
2
2
2
31
3
2
1
1
3
3
32
3
1
1
1
3
3
33
1
2
2
3
3
3
34
3
2
3
1
2
3
35
2
2
2
2
2
2
36
2
1
1
1
2
2
37
3
1
3
3
2
3
38
1
1
1
1
1
1
RECOMMENDED FURTHER TRAINING FOR SAFETY REPRESENTATIVES
WIG AGREED TRAINING APPROVED BY OIAC
Recommended Further
Training
Reason
Training
Available/Duration
Is there a Standard?
Providers
Risk Assessment
Principles are covered in
the SI971Course but it is
recognized that further
enhanced training in the
operation of Risk
Assessments is required
by Safety Representatives
YES
One day
NO
Multiple
Major Hazard
Awareness (Generic)
In order to increase
understanding of MHA and
its impact on the Revised
Safety Case.
YES
1 – 2 days.
NO
Multiple
Development of
Safety Inspection and
Auditing Skills
In order to improve and
develop on the SI 971 Basic
Training
YES
One day
NO
Multiple
Combined Training;Root Cause Analysis
Accident and Incident
Investigation
Requirement has been
identified in order ensure
Safety Representatives are
fully conversant with the
principles when engaged in
Investigations.
YES
2 Days
NO
Multiple