Transcript Group 16_Case3.pptx

Magna Carta Charter
School
Group 16
Ezinne Akobundu(50006478)
Phuc Nguyen (36865471)
Beibei Xiang (50017636)
Yinghui Cui (50014282)
Wenrui Zhang (37809512)
Academic Honesty
“The work presented herein is solely the work of the group
members stated on slide one. It is our original work and
only our work. It is work freshly created for MGQ 301 this
semester. We hereby state we received no help outside any
provided by our instructor. We promise we have not shared
it nor will we EVER. We understand and accept the
standard penalty for violations is an F in the course. If we
have left off the name of any group member, intentionally
or by accident, that member will not receive credit for this
assignment. We are fully aware that late submissions will
not be accepted.”
Objective/Purpose
• To decrease the probability that an incoming students
will needs to go to Summer Remediation program
• To determine how much to spend on advertising with
increments up to $20,000
• To figure out the new “cut score’’ for acceptance but still
keeping the class cap 65 students
• Overall to decrease the cost of the Summer Remediation
program such as teacher hiring cost.
Methodology
Effect of Advertising on the Cost
of the Remediation Program
Number of
Applicants
Cost of
Advertising
Cost of
Remediation Program
Recommendation
Currently, remediation costs total $
• Instructors = $
• Books and Overhead = $
We recommend spending $
instituting a cut off score of
on advertising and
for admission.
These changes will save Magna Carta Charter School
approximately $