Transcript https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/11/11-11-1533-02-000m-excom-request-to-proceed-to-revcom.ppt

November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
P802.11 REVmb report to EC on meeting the
terms of conditional approval to proceed to
RevCom
Date: 2011-11-17
Authors:
Name
Company
Dorothy Stanley
Aruba Networks
Bruce Kraemer
Marvell
Submission
Slide 1
Address
1322 Crossman Ave
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
5488 Marvell Lane,
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Phone
+1 (630)
363 1389
+1 (321)
427-4098
email
dstanley@arubanetworks.
com
[email protected]
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Summary
•
•
•
The IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) granted
conditional approval to P802.11REVmb to proceed to
RevCom at its closing plenary on 2011-11-11.
P802.11REVmb D12.0 has completed its sixth
recirculation ballot, achieving 97% approval and
meeting the terms of the conditional approval.
This presentation is the report to the IEEE 802 executive
committee in support of completion of the requirements
for conditional approval to proceed to IEEE-SA
RevCom.
Submission
Slide 2
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Meeting the terms of conditional approval
• As per LMSC OM Clause 14:
a) Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution should
occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional approval.
–
The Ballot occurred, in accordance with the schedule presented to the EC in document 11-11/1533r1. The
recirculation running at the time conditional approval was granted completed on schedule. The additional
recirculation shown on the plan was not required.
b) After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at least
75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes.
–
–
The approval percentage is 97%.
There are no new DISAPPROVE votes.
c) No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the
recirculation ballot.
–
No changes were made as a result of the recirculation ballot.
d) No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the
satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters
–
–
Submission
During the last recirculation, two comments that were marked “not part of a no vote” were received from an
APPROVE voter.
No new DISAPPROVE comments were received.
Slide 3
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Meeting the terms of conditional approval - continued
e) If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote,
the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor.
• There were no new DISAPPROVE comments or votes.
f) The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot to the Sponsor including:
the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any remaining
disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling any vote
invalid.
• The ballot closed on 2011-11-13 at 23:59 ET
• The vote tally: For: 150, against: 5, abstain: 9. 88.2% return., 96.8% affirmative.
• The comments associated with remaining disapproves are included in slide 11 of this deck.
–
–
•
No new DISAPPROVE comments were received; there are no new unsatisfied comments.
The numbers of unsatisfied comments have reduced slightly since R1 of this submission due to feedback from
commenters on which comments they consider to be satisfied or unsatisfied, or due to previous “no” voters changing
their votes. In addition, one voter changed from “Disapprove” to “Approve” after the ballot closed.
No votes have been ruled invalid.
Submission
Slide 4
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
IEEE 802 Sponsor Ballot Results –
P802.11REVmb
Draft
Opened
Closed
Days Pool
For
Against
Abstain
9
%
6
Return
#Cmnts
%
150 80.6
454
6.00 2010-09-21 2010-11-05
45
%
%
186 122 86.5 19 13.5
7.00 2011-02-03 2011-02-18
15
186 132 90.4 14
9.6
9
5.8 155 83.3
132
8.00 2011-03-25 2011-04-14
20
186 136 91.9 12
8.1
10
6.3 158 84.9
863
9.00 2011-06-02 2011-06-22
20
186 139 93
11
7
10
6
160 86
208
10.00 2011-08-18 2011-09-07
20
186 142 92
13
8
9
5
164 88
257
11.00 2011-10-07 2011-10-22
15
186 147 94
9
5
8
5
164 88
92
12.00 2011-11-03 2011-11-13
10
186 150 97
5
3
9
6
164 88
2
12.00* 2011-11-03 2011-11-13
10
186 151 97
4
3
9
6
164 88
2
* Post Ballot vote change
Submission
Slide 5
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Revision – 802.11
• Revision of IEEE Std 802.11™-2007 as amended by
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
IEEE Std 802.11k™-2008
IEEE Std 802.11r™-2008
IEEE Std 802.11y™-2008
IEEE Std 802.11w™-2009
IEEE Std 802.11n™-2009
IEEE Std 802.11p™-2010
IEEE Std 802.11z™-2010
IEEE Std 802.11v™-2011
IEEE Std 802.11u™-2011
IEEE Std 802.11s™-2011
• 1200 pages to 2910 Pages
Submission
Slide 6
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Mandatory Coordination
Coordination Entity
Draft
Date
Status
IEEE-SA Editorial (MEC)
D11.0
Nov 11
“Meets all
editorial
requirements. “
Quantities, Units and
Letter Symbols (SCC14)
Not required
Terms and Definitions
(SCC10)
Not required
Registration Authority
Committee (RAC)
Not required
Submission
Slide 7
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Comments by Ballot – P802.11REVmb
Draft
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
10.00
11.00
12.00
Total
Ballot
Initial Sponsor
Ballot
First Recirc
Second Recirc
Third Recirc
Fourth Recirc
Fifth Recirc
Sixth Recirc
Not part of
“no” vote
54
45
86
30
65
77
2
359
Satisfied
Unsatisfied
Total
397
129
481
178
184
11
13
4
296
8
8
5
1380
334
464
178
863
216
257
93
2
2073
• Note, counts are expanded here by comments received
from outside the MyBallot system (late comments,
comments from ISO and “unpacked” comments from
attachments to MyBallot comments)
Submission
Slide 8
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Unsatisfied Comments by Commenter
Commenter* Initial R1
Fischer, Matthew
Hiertz, Guido
11
Hunter, David
2
4
Kraemer, Bruce
Grand Total
13
4
R2
R3
R4
2
295
1
296
8
6
8
8
R5
1
4
5
Total
3
11
315
5
334
* Reflects post ballot vote change
Submission
Slide 9
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Analysis of unsatisfied comments – top
categories
• Use of “can” vs “may” – 290 remain unsatisfied
– Use of “can” in a draft has been validated with editorial staff
• Assorted MAC – 30
• Inclusion of the term “Wireless Distribution System
(WDS)” – 11
Submission
Slide 10
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
Unsatisfied comments
• The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the
resolutions approved by the ballot resolution
committee during sponsor ballot is attached.
– Double click on the icons to the right to open.
Submission
Slide 11
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
REVmb Timeline
Open
Close
6th Recirculation (Draft 12.0) (completed)
2011-11-04
2011-11-13
7th Recirculation (Draft 12.0 unchanged) **
2011-11-21
2011-11-30
RevCom – Submit to
continuous process
Dec 2011
** = Not required
Submission
Slide 12
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
November 2011
doc.: IEEE 11-11/1533r2
TGmb Conditional Approval to RevCom
• Approve document 11-11/1533r1 as the Report to the IEEE 802
Executive Committee (EC) on the requirements for conditional
approval to forward P802.11REVmb to RevCom, and
• Empower the chair to make editorial changes if required, and
• Request the IEEE 802 Executive Committee to conditionally
approve forwarding P802.11REVmb to RevCom.
– Moved: Dorothy Stanley (on behalf of TGmb)
– Seconded: Harry Worstell
– Result: 48-0-0
• In TGmb (similar motion on approval of report):
– Moved: Jon Rosdahl, Seconded: Mike Montemurro
– Motion passes: Result: 13-0-0
Submission
Slide 13
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)