Transcript https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-0801-05-000m-tgmb-ec-approval-to-sb.ppt

September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
P802.11REVmb Report to EC on meeting the
terms of Conditional Approval
to go to Sponsor Ballot
Authors:
Date: 2010-09-14
Name
Company
Dorothy Stanley
Aruba Networks
Bruce Kraemer
Marvell
Submission
Slide 1
Address
1322 Crossman Ave
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
5488 Marvell Lane,
Santa Clara, CA 95054
Phone
+1 (630)
363 1389
+1 (321)
427-4098
email
dstanley@arubanetworks.
com
[email protected]
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Summary
•
•
•
•
The IEEE 802 EC granted conditional approval to
P802.11REVmb to proceed to sponsor ballot at its
July 2010 closing meeting.
WG 802.11 recirculation ballot on
P802.11REVmb_D5.0 closed, meeting the terms of the
conditional approval
Details of meeting these terms is shown on the next
slide, and the status of the P802.11REVmb WG ballot
are shown on the following slides.
WG 802.11 requests that the IEEE 802 EC approve
the start of sponsor ballot on P802.11REVmb.
Submission
Slide 2
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Meeting the terms of conditional approval
• As per LMSC OM Clause 14:
•
Recirculation ballot is completed. Generally, the recirculation ballot and resolution
should occur in accordance with the schedule presented at the time of conditional
approval.
–
•
After resolution of the recirculation ballot is completed, the approval percentage is at
least 75% and there are no new valid DISAPPROVE votes.
–
–
•
The approval percentage is 92%
There are no new valid disapprove votes.
No technical changes, as determined by the WG Chair, were made as a result of the
recirculation ballot.
–
•
The Ballot occurred, in accordance with the schedule presented to the EC in document 11-10/0801r02.
No technical changes were made as a result of the recirculation ballot.
No new valid DISAPPROVE comments on new issues that are not resolved to the
satisfaction of the submitter from existing DISAPPROVE voters
–
–
Submission
There were 16 comments received, of which 7 were marked disapprove, from 3 voters. All three voters
subsequently withdrew their disapprove comments. Two of the disapprove comments were received from a
new no voter who changed his vote to approve on withdrawal of his comments.
So there are no new disapprove comments.
Slide 3
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Meeting the terms of conditional approval continued
•
If the WG Chair determines that there is a new invalid DISAPPROVE comment or vote,
the WG Chair shall promptly provide details to the Sponsor.
–
•
None
The WG Chair shall immediately report the results of the ballot to the Sponsor
including: the date the ballot closed, vote tally and comments associated with any
remaining disapproves (valid and invalid), the WG responses and the rationale for ruling
any vote invalid.
–
–
–
Submission
The Ballot closed on 2010-8-19
The comments associated with remaining disapproves and the WG responses are attached to slide 10
As indicated above, one negative vote received in the recirculation was subsequently changed by the voter to
approve coincident with withdrawal of all his disapprove comments from that recirculation.
Slide 4
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
WG Letter Ballot Results
Ballot
ID
Ballot Close
Date
Draft
Number
Ballot Type
Pool
Return
%Return
Abstain
%
Abstain
Appr
ove
Disap
prove
%Appro
ve
149
2009-6-27
Draft 1.0
Initial
246
207
84
29
14
155
23
87
160
2010-1-8
Draft 2.0
Recirculation
246
211
86
25
11.8
166
20
89
162
2010-4-25
Draft 3.0
Recirculation
246
212
86
25
11.8
167
20
89
163
2010-6-25
Draft 4.0
Recirculation
246
212
86
28
13.2
164
20
89
167*
2010-08-19
Draft 5.0
Recirculation
246
212
86
25
11.8
173
14
93
* Includes one post-ballot change of vote
Submission
Slide 5
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
802.11 WG Letter Ballot Comments
Ballot ID
Ballot Close
Date
Draft
Ballot Type
Number of
Comments received
149
2009-6-27
Draft 1.0
Initial
730 (491T, 239E)
160
2010-1-8
Draft 2.0
Recirculation
246 (188T, 58E)
162
2010-4-25
Draft 3.0
Recirculation
149 (129T, 20E)
163
2010-6-25
Draft 4.0
Recirculation
98 (57T, 41E)
167
2010-08-19
Draft 5.0
Recirculation
16 (9T, 7E)
Submission
Slide 6
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Unsatisfied comments by commenter
Voter
Bagby, David
Bajko, Gabor
Cam-Winget, Nancy
Chu, Liwen
Erceg, Vinko
Marshall, Bill
Myles, Andrew
Rosdahl, Jon
Stephenson, David
Vlantis, George
Total
LB149
4
5
2
LB160
LB162
LB163
23
7
2
1
4
14
2
31
25
3
30
10
4
37
1
5
14
Total
4
5
2
30
2
1
4
50
9
5
112
As described previously, there are no unsatisfied comments from LB 167.
Submission
Slide 7
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Updates since ballot 167
• 3 Commenters have indicated that all their disapprove
comments in LB167 are satisfied/resolved.
– H. Ramamurthy: “I will like to withdraw CIDs 5008, and 5011.
And I hereby change my vote on P802.11REVmb to approve.“
– L. Chu: ” I hereby withdraw my "part of a no vote" comments on
LB167.“
– G. Vlantis: ”I would like to withdraw my two ‘part of a no vote’
comments from LB167mb.“
Submission
Slide 8
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Mandatory Editorial Coordination
• IEEE SA staff performed MEC on P802.11REVmb
D5.0, and indicated one mandatory change to be made
prior to Sponsor Ballot (see
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/10/11-10-1070-00000m-revmb-mec-comments.doc ).
• This change was deemed editorial by the WG chair,
and IEEE staff liaison, and P802.11REVmb D6.0,
which includes this change, will be submitted to
Sponsor Ballot.
Submission
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Unsatisfied comments
• The composite of all unsatisfied comments and the
resolutions approved during working group ballot is
attached.
– Double click on the icon to the right to open this.
• A copy of the unsatisfied comments presented using
MyBallot access database report format is attached.
– Double click on the icon to the right to open this.
Submission
Slide 10
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)
September 2010
doc.: 11-10-0801/05
Timeline
Fourth recirculation (Draft 5.0)
Open
2010-8-04
Pool formation (45 days)
2010 Aug/Sept
First sponsor ballot (45 days)
2010-9-20
2010-11-04
Second sponsor ballot
2011-2-3
2011-2-18
Third sponsor ballot
2011-3-30
2011-4-15
Fourth sponsor ballot
2011-5-15
2011-5-30
Fifth sponsor ballot
2011-6-27
2010-7-12
Final Recirc (10 days)
EC to RevCom
2011-7-22
2011 July
RevCom to SB
2011 Sept
Submission
Slide 11
Close
2010-8-19
D. Stanley (Aruba), B.Kraemer (Marvell)