Air Liquide’s CCS initiatives at Rotterdam - Green Hydrogen (NER 300)

Download Report

Transcript Air Liquide’s CCS initiatives at Rotterdam - Green Hydrogen (NER 300)

Air Liquide’s CCS initiatives at Rotterdam
- Green Hydrogen (NER 300)
- CO2 Hub with JV partners
Brussels, 27/11/2013 l Kiewiet, Jacques l Air Liquide Industrie B.V.
Green Hydrogen opportunities in the Benelux
■ Air Liquide’s NER300 proposal consisted of Green Hydrogen in Rotterdam
■ At a later stage, Air Liquide could consider deployment at its Antwerp facility
Rotterdam:
• up to 500 kt/y
Antwerpen:
• up to 550 kt/y
2
27-11-2013
Air Liquide, world leader in gases for industry, health and the environment
2
Air Liquide’s Green Hydrogen Project
R’dam with ROAD
(EEPR + Dutch support):
1
R’dam with ROAD + Green Hydrogen (NER300 + Dutch support):
1
3
27-11-2013
Air Liquide, world leader in gases for industry, health and the environment
Air Liquide’s evaluation of NER300
Facts:
■ Air Liquide spent 4 years developing a viable and solid CCS proposal
■ Dutch subsidy secured (meanwhile withdrawn); final conditions under
negotiation
■ Major condition precedent: NER300 funding
What went wrong?
■ AL was unable to produce the Final Confirmation letter, because the
project economics as calculated under NER300 program were not
matching Air Liquide’s own economics
■ Full clarification of this misalignment was (due to NER300 competition +
confidentiality reasons) only possible after the Final Award selection
 The Green Hydrogen project was not awarded with NER300 and stopped
4
27-11-2013
Air Liquide, world leader in gases for industry, health and the environment
Main difficulties in developing CCS in Europe
1. RES has an Investment hurdle; Industrial CCS also has an operational
hurdle (Operation cost > ETS)  Is a Performance grant the right tool?
2. Transport & Storage synergy is essential for developing CCS, though:
Support programs only focus on ‘point-to-point’ solutions
■ Support schemes are managed by different DG’s + MS
■ Transport & Storage is not core for emitters
 How to develop (essential) synergies between CCS projects (clusters)?
■
3. London Protocol: cross border CO2 Transport & Storage (e.g. EOR case)
4. ETS + CCS Directives are linked via an ETS opt-in of a CO2 storage site
Civil Code
Environmental damages
Climate damages (ETS)
Capture
X
X
X
Transport
X
X
X
Storage
X
X
X
■ “Usual” liabilities for emitters
■“Usual” liabilities for E&P operators
■New and unacceptable liabilities during injection and xx yrs after closure
5
27-11-2013
Air Liquide, world leader in gases for industry, health and the environment
End of presentation
Thank you for your attention