Transcript Document 7234015
Settlement of motor claims
electronic assessment systems ensure profitability of motor insurance (best practise examples from Germany, Belgium and Poland) Dr. Richard J. Nathschlaeger Tashkent, April 2010
Global Innovation - Local Focus
Agenda
• • • • Audatex – a global company with a strong focus on Central & Eastern Europe (CEE) and Asia Effective management of claims processes Best practise examples – Germany, Belgium, Poland Conclusions
• •
01
A Global Company with a strong focus on Central & Eastern Europe (CEE) and Asia
The World of Audatex
Solera
Argentina, Austria, Australia, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Guatemala, Honduras, Hungary, India, Israel, Japan, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Mexico, Netherlands, Nicaragua, Panama, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia-Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, United States, Venezuela
Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in the Audatex World
Audatex North-America SAN DIEGO, CA SAO PAOLO, BR Audatex UISA READING, UK Audatex GAS MINDEN, GERMANY ABZ ZEIST, NETHERLANDS Audatex BEFIG BRUSSELS, BELGIUM Audatex CEE Audatex-APAC VIENNA, AUSTRIA TOKYO, JAPAN Solera SAN DIEGO, CA
5
Audatex is the only global provider of claims management solutions
• Revenue: 600 Mio. $ • Global Network of over 100.000 users • 2.100 employees in 54 countries • Brand “Audatex” now also used in North America • Over $60 million annually in product development – more than twice our leading competitor • Nearly $30 million annually in database development – four times our leading competitor
Countries in CEE
Audatex – CEE in 2010
AT- 1969 PL-1997 SK-2004 CZ-1994 RU-2003 HU-1994 UA-2004 RO-2005 TR-2008 LT-2009 LV EE HR BA MD Sl RS BY
Local Focus : Central and Eastern Europe Region Opportunity: Action:
Market Development
• • • High economic growth region Demand for electronic workflow partner New Customer quality expectations
Voice of our customer
• • Big 5 insurers go CEE • Allianz, AXA, Generali, Uniqa, VIG Manufacturer’s go CEE • VW, Dacia-Renault, Kia, Hyundai, Peugeot
New Audatex CEE Region
• • • Meet and exceed customers high expectations Respond and capture dynamic market developments Underline global knowledge, local focus • • •
AX-CEE: Facts & Figures
HQ in Vienna, 100 employees in the region Product development center in Poland
Audatex-CEE Region Introduction
• •
Audatex in CEE consists of: 10 local country organizations
• AT, Baltics, PL, CZ, SK, HU, RO, RU, TR and UA •
9 countries
are supported out of the established country organisations: • 5 Balkan countries (Slovenia, Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia, Bulgaria) from CEE-Headquarter - Austria • • Belarus and Moldavia from Ukraine Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan from Russia
Audatex-CEE Strategy
• Audatex CEE will continuously reinforce its position as
world class estimatics services provider
, • Audatex CEE will continue to build up its standing as a
premier claims services provider along the entire claims value chain
, delivering on precise value propositions and improving inefficient, mostly paper based workflows, • Audatex CEE will strive to become the
trusted partner of all our regional customers
for identifying business improvement opportunities and realizing them jointly with flexible online-offline solutions.
Future Countries in CEE
• CEE offers still a lot of opportunities for expansion • Audatex-CEE will follow its customers • Database can easily be localized
•
02
Effective management of claims processes
Largest part of premiums written goes to claims handling activities
Product development & Risk management Sales Network development Claims handling Health indemnification Repair
5% + 10-15% + 5-10% + 10-15% + 0-30% + 30-70%
Repair value control - example Ukraine in 2009
• 30% use professional tools • 15% use less professional tools • 55% use “best guess” principle
Repair value control improvement
• • Completely exclude “best guess” principle
Use professional tools
• • Sign only professional body shops for partnership
They have knowledge & know-how
• • Exclude fraud
Control everything, even the smallest claims!!!!
•
Three steps to reduce claims costs effectively
1.
2.
• • • Encourage market to use one “calculator” for estimation of damage amount 40 years of history 85 manufacturers Customized for 52 countries • • • Connect all users with offline/online solution – which is currently: Central database and case management Сommunication between partners Additional documents handling (pictures, invoices etc.) 3.
• • • Connect all users with online solution – which will provide with: Profound and logical system of case and partners management Claims history based on global market data – possibility to prevent fraud Advantageous statistics possibilities – may be used in underwriting
•
03
Best practise examples
• Comparative Market Overview – Germany, Belgium, Poland – Market dynamics – Basic motor claims data • Challenges and opportunities – Based on the market evolution insurers face different challenges – How to make the claims process faster, better, cheaper • Conclusions
1 Motor Claims Handling in Germany 2 Motor Claims Handling in Belgium 3 Motor Claims Handling in Poland 4 Conclusions
19
Germany strong manufacturers’ position, independent assessors and market consolidation Key Forces @ work Insurance
carriers trying to reduce claims costs
Manufacturers
acting as bodyshop operator and dealers Manufacturers are a
channel
for insurance policy distribution Market
consolidation
reducing number of bodyshops and assessors
German Market Manufactures
trying to prevent margin erosion for
after sales
Strong position of independent
assessor organisations
20
German Market Motor Claims
9000 8900 8800 8700 8600 8500 8400 8300 8200 2004 2005 2006 2007
Year
Number of Claims per Year ('000) 2008 2009
Source: Audatex
21
Insurers face constant pressure to improve service at a lower cost
Several steps have been taken by the market participants to increase efficiency • Reduce severity: – Standardized electronic estimate is required for every claim – Implement the research results of AZT for painting and repair – Increase the accuracy of the estimate through VIN vehicle identification • Automate and rationalize the communication – Between assessors and insurers – Between repairers and insurers – Involving all other parties – towing and rental companies • Waste and fraud reduction – Automatic SLA management – Automatic dispatching and review via Claims Filters – Electronic handling of paperwork, photos, etc.
22
1 Motor Claims Handling in Germany 2 Motor Claims Handling in Belgium 3 Motor Claims Handling in Poland 4 Conclusions
23
Belgian Market
Insurers • 34 Insurance companies Assessors • 265 Assessors – 199 independent – 66 affiliated with insurance companies Repair Shops • 2909 Repairers – 1791 brand tied – repair only specific brands – 1118 no brand Wreck Buyers • 497 Wreck buyers Importers • 30 Importers
Source: Audatex
Car Parc • 4,929,284 cars • 523,161 vans • • 152,505 trucks 355,933 motor bikes Claims • 650,000 Claims per year – 56,575 total losses – 1.12 million Audatex calculations • Some of the lower repair averages in Western Europe All claims are estimated and handled through the Audatex platform 24
The Audatex platform enables fully electronic and flexible process for everyone
Insurers Experts Repair Shops Audatex Platform Total loss buyers Importers
WAN
25
Prerequisites for the Belgian model
• Full cooperation among the insurers – All have implemented the World Audatex Number – WAN – WAN allows the process to start with any of the partners – WAN facilitates the settlement on TPL claims – All vehicles are identified through VIN • Single independent provider of claim services – Audatex does not take sides – Constant innovation together with all partners – All big partners sit on the Technology Advisory Board – Independent monitoring of partner performance – Non-compliant partners are excluded from the hub • Rules based automation of the workflow – Automatic approval based on claim size and complexity – Intelligent routing of jobs (to assessors and shops) 26
1 Motor Claims Handling in Germany 2 Motor Claims Handling in Belgium 3 Motor Claims Handling in Poland 4 Conclusions
27
Poland – a market in transition
• PZU today controls 40% of the motor insurance market • Direct insurers are opening up and growing fast • Heavy competition has translated into a price war • Insurers are focusing on closer cooperation with their partners to create competitive advantages and ensure higher satisfaction for the policy holders: – Reduce the number of non standard manual estimates – Move toward automated workflow with the repairers, assessors – Optimization of the internal workflow through removing redundant processes – Developing incentives for selected partners 28
Poland - Market Statistics
- Rapidly growing car parc - Decline in severity in 2005/6 due to large influx of old cars from EU
Motor Claims
1'600 1'550 1'500 1'450 1'400 1'350 1'300 1'250 1'200 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Year
Claims Frequency - Average Number of Claims per Year 2009
Source: Audatex
Average Claim Amount (USD) 2,144
Average Severity
2'200 2'180 2'160 2'140 2'120 2'100 2'080 2004 2005 2006
Year
2007 Average Severity (claim amount) 2008 2009 29
Poland typical “old” mistakes
• • Internal mobile assessors were sent to inspect every claim Only 30% or less of repairable claims go to Preferred Repair Networks (PRN) – No control over the non PRN repairs – 70% of non PRN claims took up to 10 times more time to settle • Shops were forced to lower labor rates – High attrition among PRN shops – – Authorized shops avoid PRN contracts No way to verify the compliance of the rates used to the contractual ones – Questionable quality of repair => negative impact on customer • • 50% of claims were paid out without proof of repair – High levels of fraud – same damage claimed at several insurers Large number of manual estimates 30
Poland - Recent Improvements
• Reduced work for the insurer – Estimates are required in standardized and mostly electronic form – – – Reduced number of process steps Internal assessors focus on “real” challenges Opportunity to automate process steps through software tools • Ability to “sell” the PRN from the beginning – Learn about the claim as soon as possible – – – Drive more work to the shops Involve shops (PRN) from the early stage to reduce rework Control labor costs in the estimate • Increase the % of controlled repair to control fraud • Apply policy to control non PRN repairs 31
1 Motor Claims Handling in Germany 2 Motor Claims Handling in Belgium 3 Motor Claims Handling in Poland 4 Conclusions
32
Best practices summary – faster, better, cheaper claims management
• Standardize the process – deviations create waste – Use standardized electronic estimating tools (Audatex is customized and operating in 18 countries in CEE) – Analysis shows savings potential of a minimum of
8% to 10% of the total repair cost
• Involve all relevant parties in a structured electronic way – Create PRN’s if market dynamics allow • Steer the claim to the PRN to get best service at lowest cost – Drive more work to trusted shops – Involve shops (PRN) from the early stage to reduce rework 33
Best practices summary – faster, better, cheaper claims management
• Employ tools to reduce severity – Manage fraud by reviewing every estimate in an automated way – Electronically control all SLA’s • Increase accuracy of planning - Reserve assignment, reinsurance, statistics
Improve customer satisfaction at lower cost !
34