National Weather Service Marine/Tropical Survey Presentation of Customer Satisfaction Results
Download ReportTranscript National Weather Service Marine/Tropical Survey Presentation of Customer Satisfaction Results
National Weather Service Marine/Tropical Survey Presentation of Customer Satisfaction Results March 16, 2004 Federal Consulting Group © CFI Group 1 Introduction © CFI Group 2 Snapshot of the American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI) • The #1 national economic indicator of customer satisfaction • Compiled by the National Quality Research Center at University of Michigan since 1994 using methodology licensed from CFI Group • Measures 30 industries, 180+ organizations covering 75% of the U.S. economy – Over 70 U.S. Federal Government agencies have used ACSI to measure more than 120 programs/services • Advanced methodology quantifiably measures and links satisfaction levels to performance and prioritizes actions for improvement • Results from all surveys are published quarterly in The Wall Street Journal © CFI Group 3 Scope of the 2003 NWS Customer Satisfaction Program Four segments measured in 2003 – Aviation (pilots and dispatchers) – completed – Emergency managers – completed – Media – completed – Marine/Tropical – completed © CFI Group 4 Marine Customer Satisfaction Results © CFI Group 5 Project Background © CFI Group • Target segment: Users of Marine and Coastal, Tropical, and/or Great Lakes products and services, including recreational boaters, coastal residents, beachgoers, and professionals. • Survey content: Survey designed over July and August 2003, with feedback from process owners in NWS (Silver Spring and regions). • Survey method: The survey was conducted online and hosted on CFI Group’s secure server. • Customers contacted: NWS publicized the survey to interested parties and provided links to the survey on multiple web sites, including the National Hurricane Center. • Response totals: The online survey accepted responses from September 9 through October 6, 2003. Completed a total of 6298 interviews. 6 Completed Surveys, by Date 1000 900 800 700 600 500 Survey link removed from NHC site Isabel 400 300 200 100 © CFI Group 5-Oct 3-Oct 1-Oct 29-Sep 27-Sep 25-Sep 23-Sep 21-Sep 19-Sep 17-Sep 15-Sep 13-Sep 11-Sep 9-Sep 0 7 Who Are the Marine Respondents? Services Used Tropical Services 71% Marine and Coastal Services 60% Other Services 13% Great Lakes Services 9% 0% © CFI Group 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 8 Who Are the Marine Respondents? Primary Operating Area Atlantic 42% Gulf of Mexico 20% Tropical Atlantic/ Caribbean 16% Other 9% Great Lakes 7% West Coast 3% Pacific Alaska 2% 0% 0% © CFI Group 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 9 Who Are the Marine Respondents? Primary Marine Activity Recreational Boater 34% Coastal resident 29% Other 15% Beachgoer 12% Science/research 4% Search and rescue 2% Law enforcement 1% Commercial fishing 1% Passenger transport 1% Freight transport 1% Cruise ship 0% 0% © CFI Group 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 10 Who Are the Marine Respondents? Most-Used Products: Marine and Coastal Coastal Waters Forecasts 91% Hazardous Weather Outlooks 91% Short Term Forecasts 85% Coastal Flood Watch/Warnings 79% Area Forecast Discusssions 78% Special Marine Warnings 74% Marine Weather Statements 70% Offshore Waters Forecasts 62% High Seas Forecasts 51% Surf Zone Forecasts 0% © CFI Group 43% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 11 Usefulness of Dissemination Methods 69 NOAA weather radio 83 NOAA weather radio 83 Internet access 40 40 42 Internet access U.S. Coast Guard broadcasts 74 U.S. Coast Guard broadcasts Local or cable TV/radio 68 74 31 Local or cable TV/radio 31 EMWIN 45 35 EMWIN 35 NOAA Weather Wire, FOS, etc. 32 32 31 30 30 32 NOAA Weather Wire, FOS, etc. Phone Phone Private Private vendor vendor 19 19 20 Radiofacsimile Radiofacsimile NAVTEX NAVTEX 18 Inmarsat-C Inmarsat-C SafetyNET SafetyNET 18 00 10 10 20 41 31 31 29 26 30 40 50 Sea Sea 60 60 70 70 80 90 90 100 100 Land Land 97% of respondents rate land methods 58% of respondents rate sea methods © CFI Group 90 90 12 CSI Comparison across Government Agencies ACSI Overall 74 Federal Gov't Aggregate 70 NWS Emergency Managers 80 NWS Marine 78 NWS Aviation 77 NWS Media Personnel 76 U.S. Mint - Collectors 84 GSA FCIC 80 Bureau of the Census 73 Export - Import Bank 70 FDA 67 FAA 64 IRS 62 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Customer Satisfaction Index (CSI) scores are based on three questions: © CFI Group • Overall satisfaction with products and services • Products and services compared to expectations • Products and services compared to ideal 13 Satisfaction Scores Services Used Other Services 13% of respondents Tropical Services 71% of respondents Marine and Coastal Services 60% of respondents Great Lakes Services © CFI Group 9% of respondents 81 80 77 76 14 Satisfaction Scores Primary Operating Area © CFI Group Tropical Atlantic/Caribbean 16% of resp. 80 Other 9% of resp. Atlantic 42% of resp. 78 Gulf of Mexico 20% of resp. 78 Pacific 2% of resp. Great Lakes 7% of resp. West Coast 3% of resp. 79 77 75 74 15 Satisfaction Scores Primary Marine Activity © CFI Group Law enforcement 1% of resp. Passenger transport 1% of resp. 81 Coastal resident 29% of resp. 81 Beachgoer 12% of resp. 81 Science/research 4% of resp. 79 Search and rescue 2% of resp. 79 Freight transport 1% of resp. 78 Other 15% of resp. 78 Recreational boater 34% of resp. Commercial fishing 1% of resp. 82 75 73 16 NWS Marine CSI Model INPUTS Quality of Forecasts Timelines of Forecasts Great Lakes Short-Fused And Other Forecasts Quality of Ice Freeze-up Outlooks Timelines of Ice Break-up Outlooks Great Lakes Ice Forecasts Clarity and utility of hurricane and tropical storm watches and warnings OUTPUTS Great Lakes Marine Forecasts Quality of Short Term Forecasts Timelines of Short Term Forecasts Usefulness of tropical forecast products Ease of understanding tropical forecast products SATISFACTION NHC Forecasts Tropical Warnings and Watches Contact NWS How well HLSs support mission needs in geographic area of interest Quality of Forecasts Timelines of Forecasts Quality of Short Term Forecasts Timelines of Short Term Forecasts Quality of Area Forecast Discussions Timelines of Special Marine Warnings Hurricane Local Statements Coastal /Offshore/High Seas Forecasts Marine/Coastal Short-Fused and Other Forecasts Coastal Flood and Surf Zone Information Contacted NWS to report problem or make suggestion Customer Satisfaction NWS overall NWS vs. expectations NWS vs. ideal Take Action Likelihood to take action based on NWS information Confidence in NWS Confidence in NWS Accuracy of Marine Warnings Overall accuracy of the Marine Forecasts Marine Forecast Accuracy Ease of understanding the data provided Ease of reading charts and graphs General Forecast Performance Timelines of warnings broadcast over NOAA Weather Radio Frequency of forecast updates General Forecast Availability Frequency NWS forecast events occur within six hours of predicted time frame General Forecast Verification © CFI Group 17 NWS Marine Model INPUTS Score: Measures performance on a 0-100 scale. 76 Great Lakes Marine Forecasts 0.9 78 Great Lakes Short-Fused And Other Forecasts 0.3 63 Great Lakes Ice Forecasts 0.0 85 NHC Forecasts 0.9 85 Tropical Warnings and Watches 0.5 80 Hurricane Local Statements 0.1 76 Coastal /Offshore/High Seas Forecasts 0.6 79 Marine/Coastal Short-Fused and Other Forecasts OUTPUTS SATISFACTION 0.4 Impact: Measures leverage of component on target variable. If NHC Forecasts improves 5 points, CSI will improve 0.9 points. 13% Contact NWS Customer Satisfaction 78 90 Take Action Confidence in NWS 87 78 Coastal Flood and Surf Zone Information0.0 © CFI Group 74 Marine Forecast Accuracy 0.9 78 General Forecast Performance 0.7 76 General Forecast Availability 0.4 69 General Forecast Verification 0.5 18 Priority Matrix: Where to Focus Attention Building on Success HIGH Maintain NHC Forecasts 85/0.9 Great Lakes Marine Forecasts 76/0.9 General Forecast Performance 78/0.7 Coastal/Offshore/High Seas Forecasts 76/0.6 Tropical Warnings and Watches 85/0.5 Score Marine/Coastal Short-Fused and Other Forecasts 79/0.4 General Forecast Availability 76/0.4 Great Lakes Short-Fused and Other Forecasts 78/0.3 Hurricane Local Statements 80/0.1 Coastal Flood and Surf Zone Information 78/0.0 Monitor Top Priority Great Lakes Ice Forecasts 63/0.0 LOW Marine Forecast Accuracy 74/0.9 General Forecast Verification 69/0.5 © CFI Group LOW Impact on Satisfaction (CSI) HIGH 19 Marine Forecast Accuracy Impact on CSI: 0.9 Marine Forecast Accuracy 74 Accuracy of Marine Warnings 76 Overall accuracy of the Marine forecasts 75 Accuracy of the wind forecast Accuracy of the wave forecast © CFI Group 72 67 20 NHC Forecasts Impact on CSI: 0.9 NHC Forecasts 85 • The usefulness of additional probabilistic information is rated an 86 – very useful • When asked which area needs improvement most, 51% of respondents say ‘Track’. No other feature is mentioned more than 11% of the time. Usefulness of the NWS/NHC tropical forecast products 87 Overall quality of NWS/NHC tropical forecast products and services 87 Improvements in NWS/NHC tropical forecasting over the past five years Ease of understanding the NWS/NHC tropical forecast products © CFI Group 86 82 21 General Forecast Performance Impact on CSI: 0.7 General Forecast Performance 78 The ease of reading charts and graphs 80 Ease of understanding the data provided Timeliness of responses to your queries Availability of information to explain the data © CFI Group 79 76 75 22 Coastal/Offshore/High Seas Forecasts Impact on CSI: 0.6 Coastal/Offshore/High Seas Forecasts 76 Quality of Coastal Waters Forecasts 77 Timeliness of Coastal Waters Forecasts © CFI Group 76 Quality of High Seas Forecasts 75 Timeliness of High Seas Forecasts 75 Quality of Offshore Waters Forecasts 74 Timeliness of Offshore Waters Forecasts 74 23 Tropical Warnings and Watches Impact on CSI: 0.5 Tropical Warnings and Watches 85 • Most-mentioned minimum desired probability associated with a watch: 30% • Most-mentioned minimum desired probability associated with a warning: 70% • 50% of respondents prefer break points over county boundaries, and 28% are indifferent Clarity and utility of NWS hurricane and tropical storm watches and warnings © CFI Group 85 24 General Forecast Availability Impact on CSI: 0.4 General Forecast Availability 76 The timeliness of warnings broadcast over NOAA Weather Radio The frequency of forecast updates © CFI Group 81 72 25 Marine and Coastal Short-Fused/Other Impact on CSI: 0.4 79 Marine/Coastal Short-Fused and Other Forecasts 82 Quality of Special Marine Warnings Quality of Hazardous Weather Outlooks Quality of Marine Weather Statements 79 Timeliness of Special Marine Warnings 79 Quality of Area Forecast Discussions 78 Quality of Short Term Forecasts 78 Timeliness of Marine Weather Statements 78 Timeliness of Hazardous Weather Outlooks 78 Timeliness of Short Term Forecasts Timeliness of Area Forecast Discussions © CFI Group 81 77 76 26 Coastal Flood and Surf Zone Info Impact on CSI: 0.0 Coastal Flood and Surf Zone Information 78 Quality of Coastal Flood Watch/Warnings 80 Timeliness of Coastal Flood Watch/Warnings Timeliness of Surf Zone Forecasts Quality of Surf Zone Forecasts © CFI Group 79 72 71 27 Other Aspects of NWS Performance The use of English versus metric units 82 The availability of data in languages other than English 48 Usefulness of 500 milibar forecasts Usefulness of wave period forecasts © CFI Group 53 45 28 What Customers Want Prefer graphical representation of forecasts and warnings services 78% Prefer text-based forecasts and warnings services 60% Prefer audio forecasts 36% Prefer gridded and/or vector forecasts Prefer other 0% 30% 4% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% • Customers express a clear preference for graphical forecasts. • A constantly-evolving forecast is preferred over a regularly-scheduled forecast, 79% to 21%. © CFI Group 29 What Customers Want (cont.) Graphical Hazardous Weather Outlooks 72% Graphical Hurricane Local Statements 70% Graphical Probability-based Wave Height Forecasts 46% Graphical Rip Current Outlooks 26% Graphical Waterspout Outlooks 25% Other 0% 4% 20% 40% 60% 80% • When asked if they want any weather information not currently provided by NWS, 82% say no. • Needs are varied, from better barometric readings to more accurate lightning forecasts to better wave forecasts. © CFI Group 30 Recommendations • • • • • • • • • Keep up the good work! (e.g., Isabel forecasting) Improve perceived forecast accuracy by increasing the number of official forecasts Give customers more information to explain the forecast data Educate customer regarding reasonable expectations, especially with wave height and period forecasts As in the Media survey, improve the consistency of Area Forecast Discussions and terminology use Ensure storm track is a top priority for tropical/hurricane forecasts Focus on graphical products, but keep in mind that radio is still a dominant method of information acquisition Examine possible causes of lower scores for Great Lakes Ice and Coastal Surf Zone forecasts Consider how different regions/users may respond to the survey differently – These overall findings will have varying applicability to specific subpopulations © CFI Group 31 Discussion © CFI Group 32 For More Information Brian LaMarre, NOAA Marine Program Manager (301) 713-1677 x108 [email protected] Doug Helmreich, CFI Group Senior Consultant (734) 623-1321 [email protected] Bernie Lubran, Federal Consulting Group Project Manager (202) 906-5642 [email protected] © CFI Group 33