Transcript Facilities & Capital Construction Program Overview • • • • • Program Overview Project & Scope Schedule Alternative & Traditional Procedure Approaches E-Builder.

Facilities & Capital Construction
Program Overview
•
•
•
•
•
Program Overview
Project & Scope
Schedule
Alternative & Traditional Procedure Approaches
E-Builder
Program Overview
• Roles – Superintendent, Chief Operating Officer &
OSM Executive Director
• $482M / eight-year program
• Construct public improvements as “complete & usable”
– ready for students
• Minimize disruption to students and staff
• “Blended team” approach
Program Overview
Projects & Scope
$5M
$69.5M
$278M
Educational Facility Improvements
Improve grades 6-8 science classrooms with sinks and electrical outlets at as
many as 39 schools.
Seismic and other building improvements
Seismic strengthening at as many as 26 schools. Replace and seismically brace
roofs at as many as 14 schools. Replace roofs at as many as 8 schools. Improve
accessibility to educational programs at as many as 33 schools.
Full modernizations or replacement
These schools are identified as potential modernizations or replacement:
• High schools with high seismic risk.
• High schools with major access upgrades needed.
• Faubion = capital partnership with Concordia University.
Grant
$95M
3 high schools –
1 K-8 –
Faubion
$28M
Franklin
$85M
Roosevelt
$70M
Projects & Scope
$45M
$84.5M
$482M
Debt repayment
Rosa Parks K-8.
Boiler conversions, prior roof replacements and other financed capital projects.
Program costs
Required reserves, materials and labor cost escalation, bond issuance costs and
improvements and transportation to buildings where students attend school
while their school is renovated. Master planning for 6 high schools ($1.5M)
Total Bond Program
Estimated rate: $1.10/$1,000 of assessed value over 8 years, $0.30 over an
additional 12 years.
Eight-Year Program
16+ Public Improvement Projects
Schedule
• Program – Project – Contract
• Chronology
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
planning
Visioning – alignment
Education specifications
Planning
Design
Bid
Construction
Post-occupancy
design
bid
construction
post-occupancy
Schedule
• Eight-year program
• Front loaded
• 10+ construction projects
Schedule
Procurement Approaches
• Contract review authority – Board of Education
function on PPS contracting activity (Local Contract
Review Board)
• PPS Public Contracting Rules – “Full & Open
Competition”
• Equity in Public Purchasing & Contracting Policy –
Enhanced opportunities for students, MWESB firms, &
construction employment
• Acquisition methods – Several in PPS’s “toolbox”
Procurement Approaches
• Oregon statutes govern (ORS 279 A/B/C)
• Bond work falls under 279C – Public Improvements
(construction & major alterations)
– Architect, Engineer, Land Surveyor or Related services
– Construction services
• Three phases of contracts – staff roles
– Pre-award; Purchasing & Contracting manages
– Award; Purchasing & Contracting manages
– Post-award; OSM manages
Procurement Approaches
• Division 48: Consultant award based on qualifications
• Division 49: Builder award basis varies
– Traditional; Award based on responsible firm
submitting lowest responsive price/bid.
– Alternative - two primary methods
• “Two step” – Select on qualifications, bid among qualified firms. Award
on low responsive price/bid.
• Construction Manager/General Contractor “CM/GC” – Select on quals,
contractor engaged during design. Set guaranteed maximum price
“GMP” during design phase
• Both methods require Board “exemption” approval
E-Builder
• District adopted project management software
– Web based software
– Document sharing
– Process workflow (RFI’s,
change orders, etc.)
– Use of E-Builder noted in
solicitations
Contact
• Lee Fleming, Purchasing & Contracting
[email protected]
503.916.3113
• Dan Jung, Office of School Modernization
[email protected]
503.916.3211
Please do not contact schools directly