Food Biotechnology Ethics Clark Ford, Ph.D. Food Science and Human Nutrition Iowa State University.
Download ReportTranscript Food Biotechnology Ethics Clark Ford, Ph.D. Food Science and Human Nutrition Iowa State University.
Food Biotechnology Ethics Clark Ford, Ph.D. Food Science and Human Nutrition Iowa State University What is Food Biotechnology? • Food technology based on biology – Ancient food biotechnology: • Fermentation by microbes – – – – Cheese Beer Wine Bread – Modern food biotechnology • Tissue culture • Genetic engineering – Different from plant and animal breeding http://www.sciencedaily.com/images/2006/10/06101709 1752.jpg Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 1953: Structure of DNA discovered • 1973: First gene cloned – in microbes • 1977: Asilomar Conference in USA – Recombinant DNA safety – Regulation – Risk assessment – Containment http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v235/milenaid/Blog%20Support/TheDoubleHelix.jpg Who Regulates Food Biotechnology? • • • • http://healthcare.zdnet.com/images/fda-logo.jpg FDA – Food and Drug Administration • Determines safety for human consumption USDA – U.S. Department of Agriculture • Determines safety of GMO agriculture EPA – Environmental Protection Agency • Determines environmental safety NIH – National Institutes of Health • Sets guidelines for Recombinant DNA experiments Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 1990: Recombinant Chymosin Approved by FDA – First biotech product for human consumption – Enzyme for cheese making – Originally from calf stomach – Bovine gene expressed in GRAS microbes • Generally Recognized As Safe – In 80% of U.S. cheese http://homepages.ius.edu/SRICKARD/cheese2.jpg Other Products from Genetically Engineered Microbes • Food enzymes – Bread – HFCS Sweeteners • Amino acids • Peptides – Nutrasweet • • • • Flavors Organic acids Polysaccharides Vitamins Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 1994: FDA approves “Flavr Savr” Tomato – Prolonged shelf life – Improved quality – Voluntarily labeled http://www.lhup.edu/smarvel/Seminar/FALL_2003/Malawskey/tomaten.jpg Other Genetically Engineered Plants • Agronomic traits – BT Corn – Roundup Ready Soy – Disease Resistance • • • • http://whyfiles.org/241GM_2/images/soybean_field.jpg Food quality Nutrition Metabolic products Vaccines GMO crops in the USA HT = Herbicide Tolerant; Bt = Bt insecticide Bt Corn • Natural insecticide protein from Bacillus thuringiensis • Non-toxic to humans • Target insect: – Corn borer, root worm, ear worm – Boll worm • reduces insecticide use – reduces mycotoxins in corn http://pfisterhybrid.com/images/sections/5.jpg • 80% U.S. Corn crop Bt (2014) • 84% U.S. Cotton crop (2014) Bt Concerns Monarch butterfly: endangered? http://members.tripod.com/c_rader0/greg040.gif • Bt pollen harms nontarget species? • Bt crops select for resistant insects • Bt pollen can drift to organic fields • Food system failed to keep BT Starlink corn out of human food products Herbicide Resistance http://cropwatch.unl.edu/photos/cwphoto/soy_harvest2002_2b.jpg • Roundup Ready soy, corn, canola, cotton • Allows post-emergence herbicide spraying • Increases yield • Facilitates no-till farming • 94% U.S. Soy (2014) • 91% U.S. Cotton (2014) • 89% U.S. Corn (2014) Herbicide Resistance Concerns • Encourages herbicide use – Groundwater contamination – Kills beneficial soil microbes • Cross-pollinates weeds • Fosters dependence on Agrochemcial companies Disease Resistance Genetically engineered papaya resistant papaya ringspot virus http://www.sciencedaily.com/images/2008/04/080423131624.jpg • • • • • • • • • • • Canola Cantaloupes Cucumbers Corn Rice Papaya Potatoes Soybeans Squash Tomatoes Wheat Health and Nutrition • Golden Rice – Vitamin A and Iron enhanced – Seeds given to the poor for free • Improved Amino Acid Balance – Soy (needs Methionine) – Maize (needs Lysine) • Banana Vaccines http://wwwdata.forestry.oregonstate.edu/orb/images/Marketing/TIME.jpg Metabolic Products • Idea: use crops to produce inexpensive – Pharmaceuticals • AIDS vaccine in corn – Metabolic products • Problems: – Containment • Cross pollination • Accidental mixing into food supply http://foodhazard.com/genetically-modified-foods/ Genetically Engineered Animals - not approved for food • Transgenic Fish – Salmon • Grows 4-6 times faster • Environmental concerns • May escape, outcompete natural species • Transgenic Mammals – Cows, Sheep, Goats • Pharmaceutical production in milk http://www.gatewayva.com/biz/virginiabusiness/magazine/yr1997/aug97/cover.html Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 1999: GM corn and soybean products are present in 80% of processed foods in USA – Corn: • starch, high fructose corn syrup, oil – Soy: • oil, Lecithin, protein http://nadav.harel.org.il/cola/image/CokeClassic.jpg Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 1999: European Union requires GM labels – blocks import of GM corn, beans • Ban lifted 2004 – but no change in anti-GM sentiment in Europe – Affects African export crops • Paternalism Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 1999: Gerber and Heinz baby foods GM-free • 2000: Mc Donalds and Frito-Lay products GM-free http://www.corrupt.org/articles/big_mac/bigmac.jpg Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 2000: USDA Organic Foods Standards – Must be GM-free http://www.taquitos.net/im/sn/NaturalPlanet-YellowCorn.jpg Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 2002 Zambia refuses GM maize as food aid – To help 2.5 million in food shortage – Calls GM food “poison” – Heavily influenced by European attitudes about GM Zambian President Mwanawasa http://news.bbc.co.uk/media/images/38232000/jpg/_38232577_levy150.jpg Milestones in Food Biotechnology Adoption of GMOs Worldwide • 174 Million hectares acres GM (2013) – Soy (79% of global soy) – Corn (32% of global corn) – Cotton (70% of global cotton) • India, China – Canola (24% of global canola) • 18 million farmers – 90% are small farmers in developing countries • Growing cotton in India, China http://www.feedstuffs.com/Media/PublicationsArticle/biotech_map_0.jpg GMO-Free Zones in Europe • GMOs Banned – 8 Countries – Many Regions, – Municipalities Milestones in Food Biotechnology • 2008: Cloned Animals approved by FDA – For human consumption • Goal: quality meat, milk • Best animals cloned • Not transgenic – Is that next? – Label not required • Considered same as normal meat, milk • Not in stores yet http://www.scq.ubc.ca/the-new-macdonald-pharm/ – Not certified organic (USDA) Controversy over Biotech Foods • Debate pits consumer and ecology groups – against Multinational Corporations • Many farmers, scientists, government agencies – caught in the middle Arguments for Genetically Engineered Food • Potential to: – – – – – – – Increase productivity Increase purity Increase safety Improve nutrition Improve food quality Improve sustainability Benefit ecosystem • Process not inherently harmful http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/images/thompson_paul.jpg • Similar to traditional Plant and Animal breeding • Unless misused, outcome expected to be beneficial – Is a powerful technology that could help humanity • Bad ideas weeded out by the market, regulation, lawsuit --Paul Thompson Arguments against Genetically Engineered Foods • Food safety risk? – unintended consequences • Safety risk for environment – could spread • Genetically Engineered label – not required in U.S.A. • Playing God – not natural GMO vs normal Salmon of same age http://www.primidi.com/images/aquabounty_salmon.jpg • Benefits multinational corporations – not consumers – not developing nations Frankenstein Foods: Unintended Consequences? • Potential GMO food safety problems: – – – – Random gene insertion Unknown toxins? New gene products? Unknown allergies? • No evidence of GMO food safety problems http://www.gasdetection.com/news2/bioengineered_food.jpg Food Allergies • 90% of Food allergies: – – – – – – – – Peanut proteins can cause severe food allergies! http://www.beginnertriathlete.com/cms/articleimages/332/home.jpg Eggs Fish Shellfish Milk Peanuts Soybeans tree nuts wheat • GM foods avoid genes from these sources Arguments for Labeling • Not equivalent to non-GM • Must use Precautionary principle • Is uncertainty in risk assessment • Labeling indicates process used • Consumer right to know and choose • Country’s right to know and choose Arguments against labeling • Suggests non-existent hazard • Expensive to segregate crops and change labels • FDA labels required if change in: • Allergenicity • Nutrition • Food Quality Will GM crops feed the world? • Yes: – GM crops are size neutral • Small growers can benefit – Don’t need large combine – Reduced inputs • Herbicides, pesticides – Lower costs – Increased yields Insect resistant maize, Kenya http://img.radio.cz/pictures/networkeurope/080215-bt-corn-africa.jpg • Disease resistance • Reduced weeds – Increased profits Will GM crops feed the world? • No: – Biotech from companies targets the wealthy GMOs for developing countries • Intellectual property expensive • Public research in developing countries – must develop GMOs for the poor • Poor that cannot compete driven from land – undernutrtion – Poor really need • • • • • International Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, India http://www.parasitologyindia.org/images/icgeb.jpg Land Water Roads Education Credit – Green revolution agriculture unsustainable • • • • Monoculture Erosion Fertilizer and pesticide runoff pollution Neocaloric (requires fossile fuels)