Results from the 2010 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Prepared by: Westat, Jessie Saul, and the NAQC Annual Survey Workgroup July 11, 2011 -
Download ReportTranscript Results from the 2010 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Prepared by: Westat, Jessie Saul, and the NAQC Annual Survey Workgroup July 11, 2011 -
Results from the 2010 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Prepared by: Westat, Jessie Saul, and the NAQC Annual Survey Workgroup July 11, 2011 - Background of Annual Survey Conducted Annually 2004-2006, 2008-2010 • Research Partners: – 2010 Westat – 2008 and 2009 Evaluation, Research and Development Unit, University of Arizona – 2006 Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, University of Wisconsin – 2005 University of California, San Diego – 2004 Tobacco Technical Assistance Consortium 2010 Annual Survey Methods Completed from October to December 2010 • Web-based survey with email and telephone follow-up: 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) General Information, hours, services offered Quitline budgets Funding sources Materials used Counselling services and protocols Promotion Utilization Evaluation 65 quitline funders and their service providers were asked to respond; 52 of 53 US quitlines responded; 10 of 12 Canadian quitlines responded. BUDGET Budget Summary • Budgets declined for the first time in FY10 • The primary impacts of the decline were a decrease in media, promotions, and outreach; and a decrease in the number of tobacco users served. • The level of services stayed relatively constant from FY09 to FY10 • Median services budgets increased in the US but decreased in Canada from FY09 to FY10 For the first time, the median and total US quitline budgets decreased slightly in FY10 Total quitline budget (sum) $1,800,000 $180,000,000 $1,600,000 $160,000,000 $1,400,000 $140,000,000 $1,200,000 $120,000,000 $1,000,000 $100,000,000 $800,000 $600,000 $400,000 $80,000,000 N=50 N=50 N=51 $60,000,000 $40,000,000 N=48 $200,000 $20,000,000 $- $- FY06 FY08 FY09 FY10 Total Quitline Budget (sum) Median Quitline Budget Median quitline budget Median quitline budgets in Canada have decreased from FY09 – FY10 Total quitline budget (sum) $400,000 $8,000,000 $350,000 $7,000,000 $300,000 $6,000,000 $250,000 $5,000,000 $200,000 $4,000,000 $150,000 $3,000,000 $100,000 $50,000 N=6 N=9 N=9 N=10 N=9 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- $- FY05 FY06 FY08 FY09 FY10 Total Quitline Budget (sum) Median Quitline Budget Median quitline budget US Spending per Smoker 2008-2010 (services and medications) $2.00 $1.80 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 $- $1.71 $1.78 N=50 $1.89 N=49 N=45 2008 2009 2010 Canada Spending per Smoker (services), 2008-2010 $2.00 $1.80 $1.60 $1.40 $1.20 $1.00 $0.80 $0.60 $0.40 $0.20 $- $0.77 $0.67 $0.65 N=8 2008 N=9 2009 N=9 2010 Funding Sources in FY10 and FY11 Public sector/government Local government funds State/provincial general funds State/provincial dedicated tobacco tax funds State Medicaid program MSA funds Tobacco settlement funds (not MSA) Federal CDC- ARRA/Stimulus funds CDC - other (non-ARRA) funds Health Canada Other Private sector/non-government Third part reimbursement through healthcare institution Third part reimbursement through insurance company Charitable foundation For-profit company Non-governmental organization Employer organization Other US FY10 (N=52) US FY11 (N=52) Canada FY10 (N=10) Canada FY11 (N=10) 0% 25% 0% 26% 0% 100% 0% 100% 21% 24% 0% 0% 4% 46% 10% 6% 45% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 52% 71% 0% 2% 82% 73% 0% 2% 0% 0% 60% 0% 0% 0% 30% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 8% 8% 0% 0% 2% 0% 2% 0% 2% 2% 0% 0% 0% 2% 10% 10% 20% 0% 0% 30% 10% 10% 0% 0% More US quitlines report receiving funds from CDC or MSA funds than any other source 100% 60% 20% 0% 39% 40% 8% 24% FY 10 FY10: CDC (ARRA) FY10: CDC (Other) FY10: CDC (ARRA and Other) FY 11 65% 80% 33% 14% FY 09 FY11: CDC (ARRA) FY11: CDC (Other) FY11: CDC (ARRA and Other) For US quitlines, the highest proportion of funds come from MSA, general funds, state tobacco taxes, and non-MSA tobacco settlement funds 100% 80% FY09 avg proportion of funds among quitlines reporting each funding source 78%77% 64% 60% 40% 76% FY10 avg proportion of funds among quitlines reporting each funding source 69% 64% 63% FY11 avg proportion of funds among quitlines reporting each funding source 56% 54%55% 49% 38% 32% 19% 20% 27%24% 18% 19% 19% 27% 18% 17% 4%4%3% 0% The majority of Canadian quitlines report receiving funds from provincial general funds 120% 100% 100%100% 90% FY 09 FY 10 80% FY 11 60%60% 60% 40% 20% 0% 30% 30% 20% 10% 30% 20% 10% 10% 0% 0% 10%10%10% For Canadian quitlines, the highest proportion of funds come from provincial general funds and Health Canada 100% FY 09 avg proportion of funds among quitlines reporting each funding source 80% FY 10 avg proportion of funds among quitlines reporting each funding source 80% 70%69% 60% 57% FY 11 avg proportion of funds among quitlines reporting each funding source 56%56% 40% 20% 14% 14% 5% 0% 0% 9% 8% 0% 0% 0% Health Canada State/Provincial general funds Local government funds Non-governmental organization Other DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES General Service Description FY10 61 or 98% of quitlines responding reported having counseling services available at least five days per week for a minimum of eight hours per day 48 or 92% of US and 8 or 80% of Canadian quit lines also offered counseling service on at least one day of the weekend 28 quitlines (26 or 50% of US and 2 or 20% of Canadian) reported having live pick-up of incoming calls (may or may not have counseling services available) 24 hours a day, 7 days a week 96% of US (n=50) and 80% of Canadian (n=8) quitlines reported closing on holidays Most US and Canadian quitlines provide multiple proactive counseling sessions FY10 US N = 52 CAN N = 10 % (n) % (n) Minimal/brief intervention—client-initiated —1-10 minutes 33% (17) 100% (10) Single session counseling more than 10 minutes—client-initiated 71% (37) 100% (10) Multiple sessions—client-initiated (i.e., reactive, client calls in for each follow up) 42% (22) 100% (10) Multiple sessions—counselor-initiated (i.e., proactive, cessation specialist / counselor / coach calls client for follow up) 92% (48) 100% (10) Phone counseling services US and Canadian quitlines provide interactive web-based programs to help tobacco users quit FY10 100% 90% 90% 90% 80% 80% 75% 70% 80% 80% 73% 65% 58% 60% 50% 40% 40% US Canada 30% 21% 20% 12% 10% 0% Info about the quitline Info about tobacco Self-directed webAutomated email cessation services based intervention to messages help tobacco users quit Chat rooms Interactive counseling and/or email messaging to cessation specialist/counselor/ coach to help tobacco users quit Methods Offered to Providers to Refer Patients to Quitlines in FY10 100% 96% US (N=52) Canada (N=10) 100% 80% 60% 40% 46% 20% 20% 0% 4% 10% 0% 0% 13% 0% Fax-referral Form Via Email Within EMR and transmit referral electronically Automatically pulled from EMR Other method Quitlines made between 3 and 4 attempts to reach fax- or e-referred patients in FY10 How many call attempts were made to make first contact with a faxor electronically-referred patient N Missing Min Max Mean US (N=52) 50 2 3 5 3.4 Canada (N=10) 10 0 3 5 3.9 Used a translation service for hearing clients FY10 100% 80% 90% 60% US (N=52) 64% 40% 20% Canada (N=10) 35% 10% 0% Yes No Number of times translation service used for counseling hearing clients FY10 How many times was the translation service used to provide counseling to hearing clients N Missing Min Max Median Sum Mean US (N=52) 29 23 0 999 61.79 3 1792 Canada (N=10) 1 9 9 9 9.0 9 9 Quitline used a third party translation service for deaf and hard-of-hearing clients FY10 100% Canada (N=10) US (N=52) 80% 60% 52% 39% 40% 20% 10% 0% 0% Video relay interpreter TTY relay CA Communication Assistant 0% 2% Other translation service Number of times translation service used for counseling deaf and hard-of-hearing clients FY10 How many times was a third party translation service used to provide counseling to Deaf and Hard-of-hearing clients N Missing Min Max Median Sum Mean US (N=52) 24 28 0 1 0.17 0 4 Canada (N=10) 1 9 0 0 0 0 0 Number of Calls of Counseling Service by Language FY10 N Missing Min Max Mean Median Sum English 39 13 0 40,281 8,210 4,750 320,180 Spanish 48 4 0 2,582 215 46 10,329 Asian Languages 1 51 392 392 392 392 392 US (N=52) ) Canada (N=10) English 7 3 190 5,899 1,273 439 8,911 French 8 2 0 16,883 2,129 3 17,029 US Primary Service Providers FY10 The figure below shows the organizations (n=15) that were the primary service provider of counseling services for US quitlines 60% 53% 50% 40% Start of Year End of Year 33% 30% 22% 18% 20% 16% 16% 12% 10% 6% 6% 6% 4% 2% 4% 0% Free and Clear National Jewish Health JSI IQH Healthways 4% 0% ACS 0% Mayo Other (1 each of 8 different providers) Canadian Service Providers FY10 The majority of Canadian quitlines (60%) had counseling services provided by the Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario Division 100% 80% % of quitlines reporting service provider 60% 60% 40% 20% 10% 10% 10% 10% 0% Canadian Cancer Canadian Cancer Society, Ontario Society and Conseil 1 Division québécois sur le tabac et la santé Alberta Health Services 1 Sykes Assistance Lung Association of Services (SASC) Newfoundland and 1 1 Labrador MEDICATIONS The number of US quitlines providing free medications has increased over time 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 70% 70% FY 2008 FY 2009 75% 46% FY 2006 FY 2010 Free Medication Provision – US Quitlines – FY10 Free Meds Type # Providing Type of Free Meds Patch 39 Gum N Median # of Weeks Provided Minimum # of Weeks Maximum # of Weeks 39 4 2 12 34 34 4 2 12 Lozenge 20 20 8 2 12 Bupropion 2 2 10 8 12 Inhaler 1 1 8 8 8 Varenicline 2 2 10 8 12 Nasal Spray 1 1 8 8 8 (Providing weeks data) PROMOTION AND OUTREACH Types of Media/Promotions and Outreach Activities FY10&11, US Quitlines FY10 (N=52) FY11 (N=52) TV 71% 85% Radio 63% 83% Newspaper ads 35% 44% Billboards 35% 48% Online advertising 48% 65% 85% 83% Information display at health fairs, meetings, workshops, conferences 88% 87% Building healthcare referral networks 87% 96% Building other referral networks 77% 75% Paid Media/Promotions Earned media Outreach Types of Media/Promotions and Outreach Activities FY10&11, US Quitlines (cont.) FY10 (N=52) FY11 (N=52) Facebook 37% 62% Myspace 8% 14% Twitter 14% 25% Other 8% 8% 10% 12% Social Media Other Types of Media/Promotions and Outreach Activities FY10&11, Canadian quitlines FY10 (N=10) FY11 (N=10) TV 70% 50% Radio 60% 40% Newspaper ads 60% 50% Billboards 0% 10% Online advertising 40% 70% 70% 80% Information display at health fairs, meetings, workshops, conferences 100% 90% Building healthcare referral networks 80% 100% Building other referral networks 90% 90% Paid Media/Promotions Earned media Outreach Types of Media/Promotions and Outreach Activities FY10&11, Canadian quitlines (cont.) FY10 (N=10) FY11 (N=10) Facebook 60% 70% Myspace 10% 0% Twitter 30% 30% Other 10% 10% 20% 20% Social Media Other UTILIZATION Utilization – Calls FY10 N Missing Min Max Median Mean Sum % of total Answered live 49 3 236 104,573 8,868 15,704 769,497 83% Went to voicemail 47 5 7 13,657 131 774 36,385 4% Pre-recorded message 33 19 0 2,797 0 128 4,237 0.5% Hung up or abandoned 48 4 48 27,294 965 2,222 106,641 11.5% Total 50 2 316 121,371 10,054 18,563 928,146 100% Answered live 9 1 221 11,439 746 2,727 24,544 93% Went to voicemail 2 8 67 147 107 107 214 1% Pre-recorded message 7 3 0 479 0 68 479 2% Hung up or abandoned 9 1 4 388 45 104 932 4% Total 9 1 453 11,577 784 2,935 26,421 100% Total Calls US (N=52) Canada (N=10) Number of unique tobacco users FY10 N Missing Min Max Median Mean Sum Total unique users 48 4 125 72,837 5,610 9,150 439,185 Smokers calling for self 47 5 141 80,296 4,711 8,701 408,947 Other users calling for self 46 6 5 2,780 272 458 21,067 Total unique users 8 2 139 4,852 322 1,273 10,180 Smokers calling for self 8 2 137 4,543 320 1,230 9,842 Other users calling for self 7 3 0 12 1 4 31 US (N=52) Canada (N=10) Number of referrals received by the quitline in FY10 Total Calls N Missing Min Max Median Sum Fax referrals 49 3 0 10,036 692 75,887 EMR referrals 41 11 0 0 0 0 Other referrals 44 8 0 6874 110 25,629 Total 47 5 41 16,910 899 96,485 Fax referrals 7 3 23 1,555 298 3,931 EMR referrals 8 2 0 0 0 0 Other referrals 8 2 0 8,812 1,207 9,656 Total 9 1 23 10,603 1,740 15,656 US (N=52) Canada (N=10) In FY10, US quitlines received 3.5 times as many direct calls from smokers as referrals; Canadian quitlines received 1.5 times as many referrals as direct calls from smokers Ratio of Total number of smokers calling to total number of referrals received 4 3.5 3 2 1 1 0.62 1 0 US Canada Total smokers calling Total referrals received 33% of US fax referrals received counseling or medications (N=40) 70000 60000 58476 50000 33% 40000 33190 30000 20000 23889 57% 72% 19573 82% 10000 0 Fax referrals RECEIVED Fax referrals REACHED Fax referrals REGISTERED Fax referrals RECEIVED COUNSELING or MEDS Average number of minutes of counseling and number of counseling calls completed FY10 Total Calls N Missing Min Max Median Mean Minutes 38 14 8 60 29.5 28.0 Calls 41 11 1 5 2.1 2.2 Minutes 3 7 5 20 15.0 13.2 Calls 3 7 3 4 3.7 3.6 US (N=52) Canada (N=10) 600,000 1.20% 500,000 1.00% 400,000 0.80% 300,000 0.60% 200,000 0.40% 100,000 0.20% 0 0.00% FY05 FY06 FY08 FY09 FY10 Number of unique tobacco users (sum) Reach (unique tobacco users calling divided by estimated number of smokers in the state or territory using 2009 BRFSS) Reach Number of unique tobacco users calling US Promotional Reach FY 2005-2010 Canada Promotional Reach FY 2005-2010 N=8 N=9 N=10 N=8 N=3 Where are we now? FY10 Reach Promotional reach (# of unique tobacco users calling) Reach (N) Registration reach (# of tobacco users completing an intake) Reach (N) Treatment reach (# receiving evidence based services) Reach (N) U.S. 1.15% (48) 1.30% (52) 1.09% (51) Canada 0.21% (9) 0.51% (3) 0.31% (9) Treatment Reach FY09-FY10 Canada 2009 2010 N 3 9 Min 0.24% 0.17% Max 1.90% 1.79% Mean 0.80% 0.49% Actual 0.37% 0.31% US 2009 2010 N 46 50 Min 0.05% 0.05% Max 7.25% 6.66% Mean 1.57% 1.45% Actual 1.19% 1.09% US Quitlines Treatment Reach and Spending Per Smoker (svcs + meds) FY10 7.00% CDC recommendation: 6% reach, $10.53 per smoker 6.00% Treatment Reach 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% $- $5.00 $10.00 $15.00 $20.00 Spending per Smoker (Services and Medications) $25.00 $30.00 Canada Quitlines Treatment Reach and Spending Per Smoker FY10 6.0% CDC recommendation: 6% reach, $10.53 per smoker Treatment Reach 5.0% 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% $- $2.00 $4.00 $6.00 $8.00 $10.00 $12.00 Spending per Smoker (services budget) $14.00 $16.00 Additional Resource on Reach Increasing Reach of Tobacco Cessation Quitlines (2009) This technical assistance paper provides a comprehensive review of the current literature on a wide variety of strategies to increase reach of tobacco cessation quitlines. Additionally, several examples from practice are included. The paper also highlights recommendations for quitline reach and funding levels from key government and health agencies, highlighting the need to increase reach to more tobacco users to save lives and direct medical costs. Available at http://www.naquitline.org/resource/resmgr/issue_papers/naq c_issuepaper_increasingre.pdf Quit Rate Data • 30 quitlines (of 65) provided quit rate data • NAQC is following up with those that did not • Further info will be provided on whether and how quit rate data will be added to the Quitline Metrics section of the profiles • Current plan: report on quit rate in profiles, each quitline can opt out, all contextual factors will be posted in the “context” field Survey Data Dissemination Process • Late July 2011 - Reach and spending benchmarking info sent to members • Late July 2011 – Quitline Profile Updates email • Fall 2011 – Quit Rate information shared with members WHO IS CALLING QUITLINES? The majority of tobacco users receiving evidence-based services are cigarette users FY10 US (median) N=21 0.2% 2.9% 0.2% 1.4% Cigarettes Cigars Pipe Smokless Other 95.3% The majority of tobacco users receiving evidence-based treatment are everyday/daily smokers FY10 US (n=16) Canada (n=2) 1% 2% 2% 12% Everyday/ daily Somedays/ Occasional Not at all 97% 86% Most tobacco users served with evidencebased services are female FY10 US (n=24) Canada (n=2) 38% 43% Male Female 57% 62% Utilization FY10 – Age Quitline Callers N Missing Min Max Mean Median Mean 14 38 38 54 45 45 Minimum 15 37 10 23 15 15 Maximum 15 37 70 101 88 89 Mean 2 8 46 47 46 46 Minimum 2 8 14 15 15 15 Maximum 2 8 84 86 85 85 US* (N=52) Canada** (N=10) * For the US, the number of callers on which the mean, minimum and maximum age were based ranged from a low of 123 to a high of 98,350. **For Canada, the number of callers on which the mean, minimum and maximum age were based ranged from a low of 1,189 to a high of 1,189. Utilization FY10 – Level of Education US US (n=22) 10% 3% 12% < Grade 9 Grade 9-11, no degree GED/HS degree 33% Some college or university College or university degree 43% Level of Education – Canada FY10 Canada (n=2) 17.0% < HS 24.0% HS diploma Some post-secondary education without degree Registered Apprenticeship College, CEGEP 18.0% 8.0% 7.0% 4.0% University degree Utilization FY10–Ethnicity US US (n=24) 3% Hispanic/ Latino Not Hispanic/ Latino 97% Utilization FY10–Race US US (median) US (median) n=23 3% 0% 1% 2%0.1% 1.3% 2% 3% 0.4% 4.2% White White Black or African Black American or African American Hispanic or Latino 10% American Indian or Alaskan Native Indian or American Asian Alaskan Native Other Native Hawaiian or Asian Pacific Islander 72% 92% OtherNative Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Utilization FY10 – Sexual Orientation Quitline Number of Callers N Missing Min Max Mean Median Straight 10 42 1264 21,807 8,354 7,616 Gay or lesbian 10 42 39 679 234 209 Bisexual 10 42 21 473 161 113 Transgender 7 45 2 17 9 11 Other 7 45 0 77 14 2 Refused 7 45 0 545 117 19 Missing 7 45 20 11,980 1939 142 US (N=52) Insurance Status of Callers FY10 US (n=21) Private, 22% None, 44% Gov't provided (Medicare, Medicaid, etc), 34% Canadian quitlines received proportionally more registrants for web-based cessation services than US quitlines Ratio of Registrants for Web-based Cessation Services to Phone-based Cessation Services 4 3.3 3 2 1 1 1 1.2 0 US Canada Registrants for webbased cessation services Registrants for phonebased cessation services EVALUATION Evaluation FY10 38 US quitlines (73%) and 2 Canadian quitlines (20%) conducted follow-up evaluations in FY10 Most quitlines had follow-up evaluation conducted by: • staff other than quitline staff (e.g., internal evaluation unit) (US n=20; Canada n=0), • an outside evaluation firm (US n=15; Canada n=1) Next most commonly cited was evaluation conducted by: • quitline staff (US n=5; Canada n=1) • the funding agency (US n=1) • an other source (US n=1) Funding Sources for the FY 2010 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health American Legacy Foundation NAQC Membership Dues Recommended Citation: North American Quitline Consortium. 2011. Results from the 2010 NAQC Annual Survey of Quitlines. Webinar presentation July 2011. Available at http://www.naquitline.org/?page=survey2010. For more information on the survey or on NAQC’s data request and review process, please contact; Jessie Saul, Ph.D. Director of Research North American Quitline Consortium 1300 Clay Street, Ste. 600 Oakland, CA 94612 Ph: 800-398-5489 x702 Email: [email protected]