High Performance Manufactured Homes Provisional UES Proposal Presentation to the Regional Technical Forum May 15, 2012 Project Sponsor: Bonneville Power Administration Presentation by: Ben Larson, Ecotope and Tom Hewes,
Download ReportTranscript High Performance Manufactured Homes Provisional UES Proposal Presentation to the Regional Technical Forum May 15, 2012 Project Sponsor: Bonneville Power Administration Presentation by: Ben Larson, Ecotope and Tom Hewes,
High Performance Manufactured Homes Provisional UES Proposal Presentation to the Regional Technical Forum May 15, 2012 Project Sponsor: Bonneville Power Administration Presentation by: Ben Larson, Ecotope and Tom Hewes, Northwest Energy Works UES Analysis by: B. Larson RTF Staff Review by: A. Hadley Presentation by: B. Larson, T. Hewes Overview / Review • Measure first presented at last RTF meeting (4/17/2012) • Discussed baseline, energy use / savings, and costs • Lacked complete plan to move measure from provisional to active status – This presentation reviews last month’s and concludes with a plan 2 Measure Summary • Measure name: High Performance Manufactured Homes (HPMH) • Measure sponsor: Bonneville Power Administration • Measure description: – Construction of new, manufactured homes in accordance with the High Performance Manufactured Home Specification Measure type: UES • • • • • Requesting Status: Approved Change in measure status: Yes (proposed provisional) Change in measure savings: No Change in measure cost effectiveness: No Other or follow-on work for RTF: No 3 Review: Uo Baseline Specifications • “HUD+” is the current NW baseline based on current market research by WSU and NEW – The “HUD+” baseline is a better performer than the Federal standard due to decades of market transformation in the PNW • All costs and savings are made relative to the “HUD+” baseline Type HUD “HUD+” NEEM HPMH Northwest Specific Uo Values Comments Federal Maximum Northwest Baseline Northwest Energy Efficient Manufactured Home High Performance Manufactured Home (Super NEEM) Uo 0.079 0.065 0.054 0.040 4 Manufactured Homes Specifications Review Units Baseline "HUD+" NEEM Envelope Ceiling R-Value R22 R38 Wall R-Value R11 -- R21 R21 U-Value % of CFA U-Value R-Value ACH 50 Exhaust Fan Btu/hr-ft2-°F 0.4 12% 0.2 R19 4.8 Market Base 0.065 0.34 12% 0.2 R33 3.9 EnergyStar 0.054 Electric FAF Electric FAF % system flow % system flow none 12.5% None - Interior none 5% None - Interior DHP HSPF 10 & Wall Heaters DHP SEER 20 No Ducts No Ducts EF gpm 0.9 EF 2.5 0.93 EF 2.5 HPWH 1.75 W/ft2 1.4 1.4 0.6 Market Base Market Base Market Base Market Base EnergyStar EnergyStar Component Window U-Value Glazing % Door Floor Infiltration Ventilation Uo HVAC Heating System Cooling System Supply Duct Leakage Return Duct Leakage DHW Water Heater Shower Head Lighting LPD Appliances Dishwasher Refrigerator HPMH "Super NEEM" R45 R21 + R5 Foam Sheathing 0.22 12% 0.2 R38 3.0 EnergyStar 0.040 5 UES Analysis Summary Refer to Measure Workbook Analysis Approach (1) • Lighting calculated with LPD method • Appliance savings from existing RTF measures • Calibrated SEEM runs for estimating – heating, cooling, ventilation, and DHW • DHW energy use – Parallel analysis to HPWH presented in 2011 Analysis Approach (2) • Heating, cooling, ventilation, and DHW energy use calculated with SEEM – DHP Modeling methodology from NEEA Ductless Heat Pump Impact & Process Evaluation: Field Metering Report • Field findings: DHP heats differing house fraction based on climate – HZ1: 74%, HZ2: 63%, HZ3: 45% • Calibrated SEEM to pre/post DHP installation periods at 91 houses – Unique simulations created for each house based on detailed audits – Note: energy uses here not reflective of DHP program savings – they are only applicable here as a calibration exercise Method Pre-Installation Billing Data Pre-Installation SEEM 66.8°F Setpoint Post-Installation Metered Data Post-Installation SEEM 69.5°F Setpoint Heating Energy Use (kWh/yr) Mean SD 9347 3892 9331 4135 6484 3894 6466 3151 N 91 91 91 91 – HPWH Modeling based on SEEM simulated annual crawl space temperature profile and HPWH COP map • HPWH installed in sound-attenuated, buffered closet which draws air from crawl space and exhausts outdoors 8 Modeled Crawl Space Air Temperature 2500 2000 1500 – 4.5 ACH crawl (350 cfm continuous) – likely worst case airflow and temperature – the air in the closet will be warmer due to tank heat loss – R38 floor, no ducts 1000 500 0 12 17 22 27 32 37 42 47 52 57 62 67 72 77 82 Temperature Bin Centers (F) SEA SPO KAL 9 Hours in Bin • Crawl space is source of air for HPWH closet • SEEM model of 1568 ft2 HPMH Annual Crawl Space Air Temperature Measure Cost by Category Category Envelope Air Sealing & Ventilation HVAC System Domestic Hot Water Lighting Appliances Total Notes 2011 $s 2006 $s Majority from Walls and Windows $ Whole House Exhaust Fan $ DHP & Resistance Wall Htrs. (less cost of furnace and duct system) 4,277 $ 3,816 Measure Life Annual O&M (yrs) (2006 $s) 45 $ - 45 20 $ - $ 4,701 $ 4,194 20 $ - Heat Pump Water Heater $ 1,110 $ 991 15 $ 26 Compact and Linear Flourescents Dishwasher & Refrigerator $ 117 $ 105 $ 62 $ 55 $ 10,318 $ 9,205 8 16 $ $ (13) - 50 $ • Sunset Criteria: – Measure shall sunset at the end of 2014, at which time the lighting savings UES component of the measure shall be reevaluated against the changing federal lighting standards. 10 Results Manufactered Home Annual Energy Savings (Prototype Weighted) 12,000 Savings (kWh/yr) 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 CZ1 HZ1 HPMH to Baseline 8,168 CZ2 HZ1 8,066 CZ3 HZ1 7,902 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 HZ2 HZ2 HZ2 HZ3 HZ3 HZ3 10,358 10,261 10,102 11,411 11,323 11,179 B/C Ratio for HPMH over Baseline 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 HZ1 HZ1 HZ1 HZ2 HZ2 HZ2 HZ3 HZ3 HZ3 12 Energy Use, Savings, and B/C Ratio Climates Heating Cooling HZ1 HZ1 HZ1 HZ2 HZ2 HZ2 HZ3 HZ3 HZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 Total Annual Energy Use (kWh/yr) Savings (kWh/yr) Baseline HPMH NEEM HPMH to Baseline "HUD+" "Super NEEM" 15,836 15,836 15,836 19,597 19,597 19,597 22,558 22,558 22,558 12,957 12,957 12,957 15,567 15,567 15,567 17,570 17,570 17,570 7,668 7,771 7,935 9,239 9,336 9,495 11,147 11,235 11,380 8,168 8,066 7,902 10,358 10,261 10,102 11,411 11,323 11,179 B/C Ratio (yrs) Measure Life 1.9 1.8 1.8 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.6 2.6 2.5 37 37 36 39 39 38 39 39 39 13 Manufactured Home Total Energy Use (Prototype Weighted) Total Annual Energy Use (kWh/yr) 24,000 22,000 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 CZ1 CZ2 CZ3 HZ1 HZ1 HZ1 HZ2 HZ2 HZ2 HZ3 HZ3 HZ3 Baseline "HUD+" 15,836 15,836 15,836 19,597 19,597 19,597 22,558 22,558 22,558 NEEM 12,957 12,957 12,957 15,567 15,567 15,567 17,570 17,570 17,570 HPMH "Super NEEM" 7,668 7,771 7,935 9,239 9,336 9,495 11,147 11,235 11,380 14 Energy Use by Load House Energy Use By Category 18000 16000 14000 12000 10000 HVAC 8000 DHW 6000 Lights 4000 MELs 2000 CZ2 CZ2 CZ2 HZ1 HZ2 HZ3 HPMH NEEM Baseline HPMH NEEM Baseline 0 HPMH wall sheathing, triple-glazed windows, DHPs, HPWH, and lighting improvements 20000 NEEM • • • • • 22000 Baseline – Big savings from 24000 Energy Use (kWh/yr) • Significant reductions in space heating, water heating, and lighting over both “HUD+” baseline and NEEM. 15 Moving from Provisional to Active Status • Open analytical questions include DHP and HPWH savings – Shell, lighting, and appliance all use previously approved analyses – The RTF and other regional organizations are already pursuing questions related to DHP (due soon) & HPWH (due a bit later) savings • Efforts should result in enough information to model DHPs and HPWHs in manufactured houses – Special question regarding HPWH inlet air temperature – • air drawn from crawlspace into HPWH closet and then exhausted outside • Proposed plan to measure temperature at 10 sites: – crawl space, outside, & HPWH closet temperature – select sites across heating zones – measurements will inform inlet temperature for modeling • After DHP & HPWH analyses have been resolved; HPWH inlet air T measured; and Federal Lighting standards updated, the measure will be revised and moved to active status. 16 17 Motion for Approval “I _________ move that the RTF approve the UES for High Performance Manufactured Homes with provisional status which will sunset at the end of 2014.” 18 Contacts • Northwest Energy Works Tom Hewes [email protected] 888.370.3277 x101 Brady Peaks [email protected] 888.370.3277 x102 • Bonneville Power Administration Mark Johnson [email protected] 503.230.7669 • Ecotope Ben Larson [email protected] 206.322.3753 x207 19 Extras Follow 20 HPWH COP versus Ambient Temperature Tier 1, <= 55 gal Tier 1 > 55 gal Tier 2 (both sizes) 3.00 2.50 COP 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 27 32 37 42 47 52 57 62 Ambient Temperature (deg F) 67 72 77 82 21 SEEM Modeled: - 4.5 ACH in Crawl - HPMH Spec Floor (no ducts, R38) Crawl Space Air Temperature (F) 100 90 80 70 60 50 Seattle 40 Spokane 30 Kalispell 20 10 0 0 730 1460 2190 2920 3650 4380 5110 5840 6570 7300 8030 8760 Hour of Year TMY3 Data: Outside Air Temperature (F) 100 90 80 70 60 50 Seattle 40 Spokane 30 Kalispell 20 10 0 0 730 1460 2190 2920 3650 4380 5110 5840 6570 7300 8030 8760 Hour of Year 22