Layer 2 DYNAMIC INTERACTION 4.5 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 Slope: -1 Slope: -81 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents Read Send Write Index SQL database Admin form/add tag & comment/tag cloud/ faceted results User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results.
Download
Report
Transcript Layer 2 DYNAMIC INTERACTION 4.5 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 Slope: -1 Slope: -81 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents Read Send Write Index SQL database Admin form/add tag & comment/tag cloud/ faceted results User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results.
Layer 2
DYNAMIC
INTERACTION
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
Series1
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
5
4.5
20,018
10,076
6,856
7,932
6,151
4
3.5
3
564
2.5
Series1
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
5
4.5
20,018
10,076
6,856
7,932
6,151
4
3.5
3
564
2.5
Series1
2
1.5
Slope: -1
1
Slope: -81
0.5
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Image/audio/video
files
METS/XML
documents
Read
Send
Write
Index
SQL database
Admin form/add tag
& comment/tag cloud/
faceted results
User search
Web application / ASP.NET
Search results
Layer 3
ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES
Additional Resources
Eastern North
Carolina
Digital Library
East Carolina
Manuscript
Collection
Guides
Joyner Library
Catalog
Library
Website
LibGuides
Internet
Research
Databases
Image/audio/video
files
METS/XML
documents
EAD/XML
documents
Index
EAD Index
Image/audio
/video files
Local XML
documents
ENCDL Index
SQL database
Admin form/tag/comment
User search
Web application / ASP.NET
Search results
Evaluation
Presented
Workers holding
award.protest
(1964).The
signs.Daily
(2007).
Reflector
Workers
Negative
Vanguard
Collection.
no. 891.
http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/6798
http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/843
Data-driven Discovery
subject
Organization/Guidance
cloud
searching full text across
multiple sources
hyperlinks in records
thematic collections
faceted refinement
better integration with
finding aids
Personalization
comments and tags
personal collections
tools for reusing collections
Anecdotal Evidence
• Use in English 1200, History Classes
• Use of A.R. Ammons collection by several
scholars
• Will add a collection specifically for the
Interior Design program in the autumn.
• Not “Mass Digitization” but “Mass
Representation”
Usability Tests
Used, but not necessarily
understood
Tagging
was
confusing
UR doin it rong
A thesaurus would
be more effective
Heuristic Evaluation
• Image Resolution
• Integration with library “Discovery,”
pedagogical tools, library instruction
• More Outreach
• More usability testing
• More cataloging needed
• Review of the use of subjects and broad
collections
The Future…
Orville Wright Glider Flights - Cyanotype #3. (1911).The Alpheus W. Drinkwater
Collection. http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/1388
Bibliography
•
Fallows, Deborah. Pew Internet and American Life Project: Search Engine Use. Available:
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Search_Aug08.pdf (February 5, 2009).
•
Head, Alison J. “Information Literacy from the Trenches: How Do Humanities and Social
Science Majors Conduct Academic Research?” College and Research Libraries. 2008;
69:5.
•
Palmer, Carole L., Lauren C. Teffeau and Carrie M. Pirmann. 2009. Scholarly Information
Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for
Library Service Development. Report commissioned by OCLC Research. Published online
at: www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2009-02.pdf
•
Proffitt and Schaffner. 2008. The Impact of Digitizing Special Collections on Teaching
and Scholarship: Reflections on a Symposium about Digitization and the Humanities.
Report produced by OCLC Programs and Research. Published online at:
www.oclc.org/programs/reports/2008-04.pdf
•
Sinclair, James and Michael Cardew-Hall. “The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful?”
Journal of Information Science. 2008; 34; 15.