Layer 2 DYNAMIC INTERACTION 4.5 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 Slope: -1 Slope: -81 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents Read Send Write Index SQL database Admin form/add tag & comment/tag cloud/ faceted results User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results.
Download ReportTranscript Layer 2 DYNAMIC INTERACTION 4.5 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 Slope: -1 Slope: -81 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents Read Send Write Index SQL database Admin form/add tag & comment/tag cloud/ faceted results User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results.
Layer 2 DYNAMIC INTERACTION 5 4.5 4 3.5 3 2.5 Series1 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 4 3.5 3 564 2.5 Series1 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 4 3.5 3 564 2.5 Series1 2 1.5 Slope: -1 1 Slope: -81 0.5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents Read Send Write Index SQL database Admin form/add tag & comment/tag cloud/ faceted results User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results Layer 3 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES Additional Resources Eastern North Carolina Digital Library East Carolina Manuscript Collection Guides Joyner Library Catalog Library Website LibGuides Internet Research Databases Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents EAD/XML documents Index EAD Index Image/audio /video files Local XML documents ENCDL Index SQL database Admin form/tag/comment User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results Evaluation Presented Workers holding award.protest (1964).The signs.Daily (2007). Reflector Workers Negative Vanguard Collection. no. 891. http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/6798 http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/843 Data-driven Discovery subject Organization/Guidance cloud searching full text across multiple sources hyperlinks in records thematic collections faceted refinement better integration with finding aids Personalization comments and tags personal collections tools for reusing collections Anecdotal Evidence • Use in English 1200, History Classes • Use of A.R. Ammons collection by several scholars • Will add a collection specifically for the Interior Design program in the autumn. • Not “Mass Digitization” but “Mass Representation” Usability Tests Used, but not necessarily understood Tagging was confusing UR doin it rong A thesaurus would be more effective Heuristic Evaluation • Image Resolution • Integration with library “Discovery,” pedagogical tools, library instruction • More Outreach • More usability testing • More cataloging needed • Review of the use of subjects and broad collections The Future… Orville Wright Glider Flights - Cyanotype #3. (1911).The Alpheus W. Drinkwater Collection. http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/1388 Bibliography • Fallows, Deborah. Pew Internet and American Life Project: Search Engine Use. Available: http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Search_Aug08.pdf (February 5, 2009). • Head, Alison J. “Information Literacy from the Trenches: How Do Humanities and Social Science Majors Conduct Academic Research?” College and Research Libraries. 2008; 69:5. • Palmer, Carole L., Lauren C. Teffeau and Carrie M. Pirmann. 2009. Scholarly Information Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for Library Service Development. Report commissioned by OCLC Research. Published online at: www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2009-02.pdf • Proffitt and Schaffner. 2008. The Impact of Digitizing Special Collections on Teaching and Scholarship: Reflections on a Symposium about Digitization and the Humanities. Report produced by OCLC Programs and Research. Published online at: www.oclc.org/programs/reports/2008-04.pdf • Sinclair, James and Michael Cardew-Hall. “The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful?” Journal of Information Science. 2008; 34; 15.