Layer 2 DYNAMIC INTERACTION 4.5 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 Slope: -1 Slope: -81 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents Read Send Write Index SQL database Admin form/add tag & comment/tag cloud/ faceted results User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results.

Download Report

Transcript Layer 2 DYNAMIC INTERACTION 4.5 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 4.5 20,018 10,076 6,856 7,932 6,151 3.5 2.5 Series1 1.5 Slope: -1 Slope: -81 0.5 0 0.5 1.5 2.5 3.5 Image/audio/video files METS/XML documents Read Send Write Index SQL database Admin form/add tag & comment/tag cloud/ faceted results User search Web application / ASP.NET Search results.

Layer 2
DYNAMIC
INTERACTION
5
4.5
4
3.5
3
2.5
Series1
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
5
4.5
20,018
10,076
6,856
7,932
6,151
4
3.5
3
564
2.5
Series1
2
1.5
1
0.5
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
5
4.5
20,018
10,076
6,856
7,932
6,151
4
3.5
3
564
2.5
Series1
2
1.5
Slope: -1
1
Slope: -81
0.5
0
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
Image/audio/video
files
METS/XML
documents
Read
Send
Write
Index
SQL database
Admin form/add tag
& comment/tag cloud/
faceted results
User search
Web application / ASP.NET
Search results
Layer 3
ADDITIONAL
RESOURCES
Additional Resources
Eastern North
Carolina
Digital Library
East Carolina
Manuscript
Collection
Guides
Joyner Library
Catalog
Library
Website
LibGuides
Internet
Research
Databases
Image/audio/video
files
METS/XML
documents
EAD/XML
documents
Index
EAD Index
Image/audio
/video files
Local XML
documents
ENCDL Index
SQL database
Admin form/tag/comment
User search
Web application / ASP.NET
Search results
Evaluation
Presented
Workers holding
award.protest
(1964).The
signs.Daily
(2007).
Reflector
Workers
Negative
Vanguard
Collection.
no. 891.
http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/6798
http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/843
Data-driven Discovery
 subject
Organization/Guidance
cloud
 searching full text across
multiple sources
 hyperlinks in records
 thematic collections
 faceted refinement
 better integration with
finding aids
Personalization
 comments and tags
 personal collections
 tools for reusing collections
Anecdotal Evidence
• Use in English 1200, History Classes
• Use of A.R. Ammons collection by several
scholars
• Will add a collection specifically for the
Interior Design program in the autumn.
• Not “Mass Digitization” but “Mass
Representation”
Usability Tests
Used, but not necessarily
understood
Tagging
was
confusing
UR doin it rong
A thesaurus would
be more effective
Heuristic Evaluation
• Image Resolution
• Integration with library “Discovery,”
pedagogical tools, library instruction
• More Outreach
• More usability testing
• More cataloging needed
• Review of the use of subjects and broad
collections
The Future…
Orville Wright Glider Flights - Cyanotype #3. (1911).The Alpheus W. Drinkwater
Collection. http://digital.lib.ecu.edu/1388
Bibliography
•
Fallows, Deborah. Pew Internet and American Life Project: Search Engine Use. Available:
http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Search_Aug08.pdf (February 5, 2009).
•
Head, Alison J. “Information Literacy from the Trenches: How Do Humanities and Social
Science Majors Conduct Academic Research?” College and Research Libraries. 2008;
69:5.
•
Palmer, Carole L., Lauren C. Teffeau and Carrie M. Pirmann. 2009. Scholarly Information
Practices in the Online Environment: Themes from the Literature and Implications for
Library Service Development. Report commissioned by OCLC Research. Published online
at: www.oclc.org/programs/publications/reports/2009-02.pdf
•
Proffitt and Schaffner. 2008. The Impact of Digitizing Special Collections on Teaching
and Scholarship: Reflections on a Symposium about Digitization and the Humanities.
Report produced by OCLC Programs and Research. Published online at:
www.oclc.org/programs/reports/2008-04.pdf
•
Sinclair, James and Michael Cardew-Hall. “The folksonomy tag cloud: when is it useful?”
Journal of Information Science. 2008; 34; 15.