Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 100 Introduction to Criminal Justice Dr.
Download ReportTranscript Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 100 Introduction to Criminal Justice Dr.
Department of Criminal Justice California State University - Bakersfield CRJU 100 Introduction to Criminal Justice Dr. Abu-Lughod, Reem Ali Present and Emerging Trends: The Future of Criminal Justice WAR AND PEACE IN CJ: Struggling between the extremes of waging war on criminals and making peace with citizens The WARS on crime and drugs: war is a slippery term. Since we have criminals as the “enemy” in society, we use warlike strategies to fight against crime. But is fighting crime like fighting war? Before war on terrorism, there was war on crime, drugs and poverty The War on Terrorism Police officers (protect citizens and keep peace) are different than the military (attack enemy) Terrorism has changed this: Terrorists in the U.S. have been stereotyped as men of Middle Eastern dissent but they can be of any political group E.g. some of Taliban prisoners at Guantanamo Bay are Australian and British Also while police officers are reactive, military soldiers are proactive The CJS is reactive and sometimes criticized for acting too late Terrorism again changed this: Events of Sep. 11th inspired a new wave of patriotism Differences between fighting the war on terrorism and other social problems in society 1) war on T has a clear and identifiable outside enemy 2) war on T is more political rather than social (more international) 3) war on T uses military weapons, resources not available to local/state L.E. agencies 4) an outside terrorist enemy does not enjoy U.S. legal protections…denied basic legal rights 5) terrorists firmly believe their cause is just IMPACT OF SEP. 11TH Large scale terrorism can be brought anywhere One attack where terrorists used the nation’s own airlines to attack ISSUES THAT HAVE CONTRIBUTED TO THE TRAGEDY: 1) Airport security: electronically search passengers for metal weapons People learned to accept minimal intrusions on their privacy in exchange for safety Hijackers Sep 11th were able to smuggle relatively small, unobtrusive box cutters onto the plane 2) passengers’ response: Cooperated hoping for some deal to be made that would grant their release 3) Rights of aliens: Lack of cooperation and information transfer between federal agencies prior to Sep 11th DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Public servants have been more highly recognized Increase attention to allocation of resources More competitive salaries Congress responded by passing the Patriot Act: uniting and strengthening America by providing appropriate tool required to intercept and obstruct terrorism act Gave government latitude over issues that mainly concern citizens’ rights Dept. of HS: The FBI and CIA were not part of it for 2 reasons: 1) independence would be lost. They don’t only work to prevent T and therefore lose authority to decide on how best to deploy their resources 2) political: mature agencies with politicians within network and own organizational culture. Otherwise political battle TWO MOST CONTROVERSIAL ASPECTS OF PATRIOT ACT: 1) Judicial review: before, government had to convince a judge that there was probable cause to suspect an individual. Now, government officials can go fishing for information that are subject to warrantless searches 2) Secret searches: government can search homes and property without prior notice or subsequent notification that the residence has been searched. Political state rather than protecting a free democracy HOW “T” IS CHANGING THE CJS: 1) Threat affects the whole U.S. 2) Altering funding priorities 3) New level of training and preparation 4) Communication between all levels state/local/federal PEACEMAKING CRIMINOLOGY AND RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Correct means: Gandhi Restorative justice Ascertainable criteria Categorical imperative Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and social justice The reality behind peacemaking criminology?