Impact of AMDAR/RS Modelling at the SAWS Warren Tennant Weather Forecast Modelling at the SAWS • UK Met Office Unified Modelling system running operationally at.
Download ReportTranscript Impact of AMDAR/RS Modelling at the SAWS Warren Tennant Weather Forecast Modelling at the SAWS • UK Met Office Unified Modelling system running operationally at.
Impact of AMDAR/RS Modelling at the SAWS Warren Tennant Weather Forecast Modelling at the SAWS • UK Met Office Unified Modelling system running operationally at the SAWS since September 2006 • Installed under an operational licence with Met Office that includes: – using the model for operational forecasting responsibilities – Includes limited commercial use of model output – Real-time feed of model input data (initial conditions and observations) from Met Office – Software support and upgrades – Scientist exchange and visits SAWS National Responsibility SAWS is responsible to the public of South Africa to provide: national forecasts of basic weather conditions up to three days ahead advisories of high-impact weather conditions up to 48-hours ahead and longer where possible, and warnings of imminent severe weather, to safeguard lives and property and mitigate the impact of weather on South Africans SAWS SADC Responsibility SAWS serves as a WMO Regional Specialised Meteorological Centre (RSMC) for the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) Plays a backup role in the event of national disasters, e.g. Tropical Cyclone in Mozambique Provides NWP guidance products to SADC as part of the WMO/CBS Severe Weather Forecasting Demonstration Project (SWFDP) Process to role-out UM SA12 forecasts (images and data) to SADC countries has been started SA12 Regional Model (based on Met Office NAE model) 1. 2. 3. Reconfigure global input for 48hr fcst at 00Z 3DVAR at 06 & 12Z from above => 48hr fcst at 12Z Continuous 3DVAR 6hourly cycle => 48hr fcst at 00Z Observations in southern Africa • SAWS has a moderate upperair network – 8 GPS stations – 2 Island stations • QC and availability good • Rest of southern Africa is a rawindsonde void Global AMDAR Availability 00Z Global AMDAR Availability 06Z Global AMDAR Availability 12Z Global AMDAR Availability 18Z SAA-AMDAR Coverage OSE Experiment Design Continuous 3dVAR 6-hourly cycle Control: All observations Experiment: No AMDAR or Rawindsondes Independent: Interpolated global model 4dVAR initial conditions (no LAM DA) Winter case: 1 May to 8 Jul 2007 Summer case: 24 Oct 2006 to 18 Jan 2007 Verification:~2000 rainfall stations and ~10 rawindsonde stations in South Africa Wind-speed verified against Rawindsondes Wind Speed T-Corr vs RadioSondes (May-Jun-Jul) 1 0.95 0.9 Correlation Coefficient • Obvious impact on analyses • Significant impact at 24 hours • Little impact at 48 hours (slight degradation at 250hPa) • Forecast without DA better scores! 0.85 0.8 Control 0.75 Exp Global Interp 0.7 0.65 0.6 0.55 0.5 850 Anal 500 250 850 24hr 500 250 850 48hr 500 250 Spatial ACC of wind-speed :: MJJ • Impact of AMDAR/RS on wind speed is positive throughout • True even if using global 4dVAR analysis as verification standard • Run with no-DA sometimes better than DA run – especially after 48 hours Spatial ACC :: Wind Speed (May-Jun-Jul 2007) 1 0.95 0.9 Control 0.85 Exp Global Interp 0.8 0.75 0.7 850 Anal 500 250 850 24hr 500 250 850 48hr 500 250 Spatial ACC :: Wind Speed (May-Jun-Jul 2007) (Using Global 4dvar Analysis) 1 0.95 0.9 Control 0.85 Exp 0.8 Global Interp 0.75 0.7 850 Anal 500 250 850 24hr 500 250 850 48hr 500 250 Temperature temporal correlation to Radiosondes • Mostly positive impact • Some cases where noDA works better 1 Correlation Coefficient – possibly because 4dVAR initial conditions from global model better – Inconsistency at LBCs from LAM DA initial conditions Tem perature T-Corr vs RadioSondes :: NDJ 0.95 0.9 Control 0.85 Exp Global Interp 0.8 0.75 0.7 850 500 Anal 250 850 24hr 500 250 Forecast Hour 850 48hr 500 250 Spatial ACC of temperature forecasts • Similar to wind speed results • Positive impact throughout • Less dependency of impact on forecast lead-time Spatial ACC NDJ :: Tem perature (Control Analysis) 1 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.9 Control Exp Global Interp 850 Anal 500 250 850 24hr 500 250 850 48hr 500 250 Spatial ACC NDJ :: Tem perature (Global 4dvar Analysis) 1 0.99 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.95 0.94 0.93 0.92 0.91 0.9 Control Exp Global Interp 850 Anal 500 250 850 24hr 500 250 850 48hr 500 250 Rainfall forecast verification :: BIAS Area Average Rainfall Bias (% of Observed) :: Day 1 NDJ :: 250 • Bias expressed as a percentage of the observed rainfall • Summer Case: – No strong impact on forecast day 1 – On day 2 more positive impact, except very light rain 200 150 ct l 1 exp 1 glb 1 100 50 0.2 1 2 5 10 20 50 0 C u t o f f T h r e sh o l d ( m m ) Area Average Rainfall Bias (% of Observed) :: Day 2 NDJ : 250 200 150 ct l 2 exp 2 glb 2 100 50 0.2 1 2 5 10 0 C u t o f f T h r e sh o l d ( m m ) 20 50 Rainfall forecast verification :: BIAS Area Average Rainfall Bias (% of Observed) :: Day 1 MJJ :: 250 • Winter Case: – Bias similar on forecast day 1 – Slight negative impact for light rain amounts on day 1 – On day 2 not a positive impact as with summer case 200 150 ct l 1 exp 1 glb 1 100 50 0.2 1 2 5 10 20 50 0 Area Average Rainfall Bias (% of Observed) :: Day 2 MJJ : 250 200 150 ct l 1 exp 1 glb 1 100 50 0 0.2 1 2 5 10 20 50 Rainfall forecast verification :: RMSE Rain RMSE (%) :: Day 1 NDJ :: • Summer Case: – No strong impact on forecast day 1 – On day 2 positive impact for all thresholds – DA runs better than no-DA run except for heavy rain 140 120 100 Cont rol 80 No AM DAR/ RS 60 Global Int p 40 20 0 0.2 1 2 5 10 20 50 C u t o f f T r e sh o l d ( m m ) Rain RMSE (%) :: Day 2 NDJ :: 160 140 120 100 Cont rol 80 No AM DAR/ RS Global Int p 60 40 20 0 0.2 1 2 5 10 C u t o f f T r e sh o l d ( m m ) 20 50 Summary and Conclusions • AMDAR/RS have a definite positive impact on regional model 3dVAR forecasts in southern Africa • Impact decreases with forecast lead-time :: signal probably influenced by LBCs • Best impact found with wind in mid-upper troposphere in tropics • Data assimilation plays an important role in rainfall initialisation • Impact on rainfall best seen in day 2 forecasts and with heavy rainfall in winter