U.S Conference of Mayors Urban Water Council • • • • August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional elections.
Download ReportTranscript U.S Conference of Mayors Urban Water Council • • • • August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional elections.
U.S Conference of Mayors Urban Water Council • • • • August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional elections Four Priority Areas • Jobs and Public/Private Partnerships: Keep America Working • Smart Investment: New Infrastructure for a New Economy • Public Safety and Homeland Security: Keeping America Safe • Restrict Unfunded Mandates & Cost Shifts: Improve the Intergovernmental Partnership Public/Private Partnerships • Tax Incentives …foster private investment in modern infrastructure development including transportation and water projects • Modernization of Infrastructure Financing… develop creative public/private partnerships to help finance major projects in areas such as water and wastewater WATER REPORT CARD – D • 54,000 drinking water systems, aging rapidly • Infrastructure needs continue to increase • Annual shortfall of $11 billion need to replace or rehab facilities and to comply with Federal regulations • Forecast for drinking water systems indicates a downward slope Grade given by the A.S.C.E. (American Society for Civil Engineers) on the nations key infrastructures, including water systems. WASTEWATER GRADE – D • 16,000 wastewater systems facing enormous needs • $12 billion annual shortfall in funding for infrastructure needs • More than 1/3 of U.S. surface waters do not meet water quality standards • Risk losing environmental gains from the last 3 decades Grade given by the A.S.C.E. (American Society for Civil Engineers) on the nations key infrastructures, including water systems. Urban Water Council Water Infrastructure Investment at a Critical Crossroad Municipal investment accounts for lion’s share •EPA estimates of NEED are in the hundreds of billions •State budget deficit in tens of billions •Federal budget deficit in the hundreds of billions Urban Water Council EPA’s Water Infrastructure – “Needs Gap” 20 year (2000-2019) investment needed to comply with existing law : •$271 billion for clean water •$263 billion for drinking water •A $534 billion gap Estimates – September, 2002 Urban Water Council Public/Private Partnerships Provide Much NEEDED Help •Design-Build-Operate saves $$ in Construction Costs •Private Activity Bonds can enhance Financing Opportunities •Short- and Long-Term Outsourcing Urban Water Council Public/Private Partnerships A Proven Track Record • Majority of the US population served by Investor Owned Drinking Water Utilities • 4 – 6 % of Wastewater Treatment Facilities under short- or long-term partnerships/outsourcing Proven Partnerships Wastewater Treatment Plant • • • • • $74 mill cost savings over 25 years – Repay sewer loan from (Serves 71,000 pop) general fund $48 mill concession fee – Eliminate City Budget GO Bond debt in sewer Deficit fund – Defease outstanding GO Bond debt in sewer fund Rate stabilization + CPI • Rate stabilization + CPI Save $40 mill in compliance upgrades Proven Partnerships • $840 K in capital improvements 60 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 28 Pump Stations • $10 mill concession fee • $5 mill of fee dedicated to new capital improvements Proven Partnerships Scranton, Pennsylvania • $20 mill in capital improvements • $8 mill concession fee 20 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plant 7 Pump Stations • Stabilize user rates for 5 years • Cap operations costs for 5 years Proven Partnerships 60 MGD, 10 MGD And 5 MGD Wastewater Treatment Plants • $150 mill saved over 18 years • Cutting-edge technologies and employee crosstraining for better services at no cost increase • Biosolids Odor Control Program- no complaints • Biosolids Recycling saving $85,000 Proven Partnerships Water Treatment Plant (Serves 228,000 pop) (Manages 3,000 Acre Watershed) • Estimated total Public Benefits between $58 and $73 mill • Utility costs down 20% • Maintenance costs down 30% • Purchases from minority and women owned businesses reaches 22.7%, exceeding 12% target Proven Partnerships • $50 mill + in concession fees • Managed rate increases equal to 1.5% over 40 years to match need for capital improvements Asset TransferDrinking Water Treatment Plant 40-Year Service Contract • Fees to be used for for property tax redistribution • Partnership helped City reduce debt of $110 mill to $78 mill Proven Partnerships City of Sugar Land Combined Water, Wastewater Systems Multiple Systems with Public/Private Contracts City System – 8900 meters, 3 water, 1 wastewater, serves 29,000 Private System – 12,100 meters, 2 water, 1 wastewater, serves 40,000 • Allows City Staff to focus on long range planning, CIP & infrastructure management • Reduction in expensive capital outlays for specialized services • Reduction in City staff, especially in hard to fill technical positions • Increased flexibility to handle repairs and emergency response Urban Water Council