Transcript Slide 1

Partnerships and collaborative
working
Wesley Harcourt
AdviceUK
VSF Conference
19 July 2011
Why set up a partnership?
• Capitalise on a funding opportunity
• Meet a funders criteria
• Fill a gap in service delivery
– Deliver new services
• Develop a network of providers
– Work more closely with existing agencies
• Coordinate a collective response to a
policy issue
– influence local/regional/national policy
Range of partnerships
Types of partnerships
• Geographical: Borough wide, Sub
regional, Pan London
• Sector: single sector, cross sectoral
involving private, public or statutory
sectors
• Purpose: service delivery, strategic,
created for funding, single issue or a
number of projects
Partnerships with the
statutory sector
• NHS
• Regeneration
• Social services – e.g. service delivery
partnerships
• Children’s services – e.g. multi agency
partnerships to deal with gang violence
• Big society – libraries, community interests
Models of partnership
structure
• Separate organisation
• Virtual organisation
• Co-location of staff from partners
• Steering group
Types of agreement
• Memorandum of understanding
• Terms of Reference
• Service level agreements
• Formal/legal contracts
Benefits
• Access
• Encouraging innovation
• Opportunity to collaborate
• Manage existing resources
Risks to working in
partnership
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Limited resources
Incompatibility
Managing expectations
Reputation
Loss of identity
Conflict of interest
Imbalance of power
Steps to partnership
• Preparation
– Identify the need for your partnership
• Decision making and planning
– Identify potential partners
– Agree how to work together
– Measure partner contribution
– Get commitment
Steps to partnership
• Implementation
– Formalise the partnership
– Manage the partnership
• Organisational
• Financial
• Project
• Review and learning
– Monitoring and evaluating your partnership
– Exit strategy
BAN – a case study
BME Advice Network
• 43 agencies across London
• Set up in response to Big Lottery
• 18 agencies funded by London Councils
• All have CLS Quality Mark
• Written partnership agreement
• Terms of reference
Issues
• A two tier partnership?
• Conflict between ‘funded’ and ‘non funded’
members
• Boundaries between the two can be
blurred
• Standardisation/consistency of monitoring
• Lead partner role
• Sanctions
The future
London Councils funding ends September
2012
Option 1
• Partnership ends when funding ends
Option 2
• Continue as a loose network or forum
Option 3
• Incorporation