The SuperB Project

Marcello A. Giorgi Università di Pisa INFN Pisa

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Outline

• Introduction • The physics case in the era of LHC • Accelerator : SuperB is not just an upgrade of the present BFactories it is a: SUPER FLAVOR FACTORY • The Detector • The process

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Successful Flavour Physics

Great results in Flavor Physics have been obtained in the past few years both in the lepton and hadron sectors.

PEPII and KEKB BFactories together with K and neutrino experiments have played an important role .

Direct CP violation in K sector, ruling out superweak models, was firstly established at Cern in Na31 and Na48 experiments .

Babar and Belle have discovered CP violation in b sector and measured sin2 b in 2001, the direct CP in 2007. October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Great success of accelerator physics Total > 1.1ab−1

Design Lumi Design Lumi

PEP-II (BaBar) 400fb-1 October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi KEKB (Belle) 710fb-1

CKM Unitarity Triangle Before Bfactories One example of CKM information coming only by sides measurements

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg

NOW!

Marcello A. Giorgi

CP Violation and the Unitarity Triangle

V

*

ud V ub



V cd V cb

* 

V td V tb

*  0  “The” Unitarity Triangle

V ud V

*

ub V cd V

*

cb

(  ,  ) 

V cd V

*

cb V td V tb

* Sides are determined from the rates for various processes Angles are determined from CP-violating asymmetries Area is proportional to the amount of CP violation    0 

CP V cd

b

V cb

* ( 0 , 0 ) Length of each side ~ O(

28.06,2007 PISA- SNS

l 3 ) ( 1 , 0 ) 

Marcello A Giorgi Goal of the B Factories is to overconstrain the apex (



,



) and look for inconsistencies → New Physics!

NOT ONLY B!

D sJ and many other intriguing new particles……

ICHEP06

D sJ * (2317) + D sJ (2460) + Hot topic 2004: Mass and width are far from predicted New DK state(s) at 2.86GeV/c 2 D s2 (2573) + X Y Z Y(3940)



J/



X(3872)



J/



ee



J/



X(3940)



c2 ’ ?

?

ee



Y(4350)



ee



J/



X(3940)

m D



s

2    / 2    October 20, 2007 / 2 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg 2   (

D s

2             Marcello A. Giorgi 2 / 2 Evident new resonance at 2.86GeV/c 2 2 Hints of a broad state at 2.69GeV/c 2

Most recent the D 0 MIXING in Babar and Belle

D

0 

D

0

mixing

x’= (0.85+0.32-0.31)% y’= (0.71+0.20-0.22)% (HFAG- D.Asner) cos

d

= 0.40+0.23-0.31 x=0,y=0 is excluded at 5

s

CPV is indication of NP as x>>y

L=380 fb

-1

No Mixing

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

The Physics case

DATA SAMPLE: 5 ÷10 10 10 B Bbar pair and a same order of t and c-cbar pair.

Possibility of special runs with luminosity 1035 cm-2 s-1 at Ecm=4GeV.

Possibility of at least one polarized beam.

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

SuperB Physics case • There is a solid case for a SuperB collecting between 50 and 100 ab -1 ( 5. 10 10 -10 11 B, charm, t pair) – Precision measurements allowing to detect discrepancies from the standard model – Reduced theoretical uncertainties will allow this in many channels – Rare decay measurements – Lepton flavour violation, Tviolation in tau, tau anomalous magnetic moment.

– In addition: possibility to run at tau/charm threshold, polarized beam • Complementarity with LHC has been studied in the CERN workshop Flavour Physics in the era of LHC .

– (M.Mangano,T.Hurth to be published soon as CERN yellow report) • See in addition to SuperB CDR: – The Discovery Potential of a Super B Factory (Slac-R-709) – Letter of Intent for KEK Super B Factory (KEK Report 2004-4 ) – Physics at Super B Factory (hep-ex/0406071) – SuperB report (hep-ex/0512235) – Many documents available at the URL : www.pi.infn.it/SuperB – BUT MORE IMPORTANT…… THE UNEXPECTED DISCOVERY FROM A FRONTIER MACHINE October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Triangle vertex Determined by N.P.

free processes

UTfit as now and with SuperB 1 ab -1 50 ab -1

With 50 ab-1 

is measured at 1° level

Theoretical uncertainties on sides could be reduced: (V.Lubicz, SuperB IV Villa Mondragone nov.2006) Vub : 2% (excl.) 2% (incl.)Vcb : 1% (excl.) 0.5% (incl.) October 20, 2007 Marcello A. Giorgi QWG07-Desy-Hamburg

WHERE from NP?

LHC, ILC Mass spectrum, interactions New physics

Quark sector

Flavor mixing, CP phases LHCb,

K

experiments… n experiments, g m -2, m g e  , etc.

n mass and mixing, CPV, and LFV t t LFV, CPV October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

The case for a high luminosity flavour factory    

b s s

 ,   ,(

KK

)

CP d s d K S

0 Prejudice: if there is New Physics at the TeV scale it must have a flavor/CP structure New heavy quanta can be detected through precision measurement of processes involving loop diagrams Statistics of O(50 ab -1 ) is necessary to reduce the experimental error below the theoretical uncertainty for the most sensitive analyses Physics reach is complementary to LHC-LHCb:    many rare decays are not accessible at LHC; sensitivity to off-diagonal term of squark mixing matrix, test of LFV , CP violation studies and anomalous magnetic moment measurements in t , also thanks to the beam polarization. October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

NEW PHYSICS AT

D

F=1

D

F=2 LFV in

t , t

magnetic structure CP and CPT in

t

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

ICHEP06: b D

F=1

from

b

g

s

Penguins Theory tends to predict positive shifts (originating from phase in Vts) Naïve average of all b g sin2 b eff = 0.52 ± 2.6 s s modes 0.05

deviation between penguin and tree (b g s) (b g c)

More statistics crucial for mode-by-mode studies!

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

NP in Box Diagram (Mixing/FCNC)

Contributions BSM can show in these processes. If prametrise with amplitude C and phase  D F=2 mixing process, C=1 an  =0 are in SM October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Present constaraints on NP for

D

F=2 processes

From B d mixing Now SuperB with 75 ab -1

z o o o o m

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Various hypothesis on NP

Minimal Flavor Violation:

– No NP couplings with Flavor – CP violation from SM Yukawa couplings • Several NP scenarios in MFV:1HDM/2HDM,MSSM, ADD, ..

MFV sensitive up to 6 L 0 (14 TeV) Doesn’t require to match L of EWBS. 2HDM allows for B tn NP with small tan b at m<1 TeV October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

B leptonic decays

Paradisi, Masiero, Petronzio ’05, Isidori, Paradisi ’06 Test of t/m universality O(10%) Enhancement in GUT-SUSY models Precision with 50 ab -1 at SuperB ~ 7% Large tanb makes possible search above several TeV October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Lepton Flavor Violation in

t

decay

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

t CP ,CPT violation

A.Bevan Hadron 07 (oct.2007)

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

D0 mixing • Recent measurements from Babar and Belle demonstrated Bfactory capabilities in charm physics • Possibility to measure CP violation in the charm sector 1month October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Physics reach on B mesons at SuperB 5ab -1 SuperB 50ab -1 SuperB

From ’05 T.Iijima talk

2fb -1 LHCb October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Super B factory and Super LHCb : SuperB numbers from

Sensitivity Comparison ~2020

M Hazumi - Flavour in

LHCb 100 fb -1 vs Super-B factory 50 ab -1

LHC era workshop; LHCb numbers from Muheim B s time dependent CDF numbers from Ristori

CDF an important player

analysis only for LHCB  LHCb  Super B Com mon No IP, Neutrals, n , only for SuperB • • SuperB runs at Y5s QWG07-Desy-Hamburg 

t t ta g ta g

 

t t CP CP

  

t ta g



t ta g



t



t CP

ΔΓs, possible Bs -> μμ YES Asl(s) YES Marcello A. Giorgi γγ YES

The e+ e- machine

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

e+e- colliders

M.Biagini EPS 07

10 37 Super-Factories SuperB 10 35 Factories KEK-B PEP-II ILC 10 33 10 31 10 29 DA



NE VEPP2000 BEPCII CESR DORIS2 PEP VEPPII ADONE BEPC SPEAR2 VEPP4 PETRA PETRA DCI LEP LEP LEP Storage rings ADONE 10 27

October 20, 2007

1

QWG07-Desy-Hamburg

10

Marcello A. Giorgi

c.m. Energy (GeV) 100 1000

Summary from Oide’s talk at 2005 2 nd Hawaii SuperBF Workshop

• Present design of SuperKEKB (SAME CONSIDERATIONS FOR PEPII) hits fundamental limits in the beam-beam effect and the bunch length (HOM & CSR) 1 . Higher current is the only way to increase the luminosity .

• Many technical and cost issues are expected with a new RF system

We need a completely different collider scheme.....

“Just” increasing the current of PEP-II/KEKB is expensive •wall power •detector background explosion •effective limitation on present detector technology around 5x10 35

1 High order modes, Coherent Synchrotron Radiation

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Basic concepts • B-factories reachs already very high luminosity (~10 34 s -1 cm to extrapolate the requirements from the current machines: -2 ). To increase of ~ two orders of magnitude (KeKB-SuperKeKB) it is possible Parameters : • Higher currents • Smaller damping time (f(exp1/3)) • Shorter bunches • Crab collision • Higher Disruption • Higher power SuperKEKB (3 factors to High Lumi) • SuperKeKB Proposal is based on these concepts

Increase of plug power ($$$$$..) and hard to operate (high current, short bunches) look for alternatives keeping constant the luminosity => new IP scheme: Large Piwinsky Angle and CRAB WAIST

October 20, 2007 Marcello A. Giorgi QWG07-Desy-Hamburg

A new idea...

P. Raimondi’s idea to focus more the beams at IP and have a “large” crossing angle  large Piwinski angle • Ultra-low emittance (ILC-DR like) • Very small b at IP • Large crossing angle • “Crab Waist” scheme • Small collision area • Lower

Test at DA



NE this November !!!

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi b is possible • NO parasitic crossings • NO synchro-betatron resonances due to crossing angle

Large crossing angle, small x-size

s x

1) Head-on, Short bunches Overlap region

s z (1) and (2) have same Luminosity, but (2) has longer bunches and smaller s x With large crossing angle the x and z planes are swapped October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg b

Y 2) Large crossing angle, long bunches

s

z

s x Large Piwinski angle: 

= tg(

q)s

z /

s

x

y waist can be moved along z with a sextupole on both sides of IP at proper phase “Crab Waist”

IP beam distributions for KEKB

October 20, 2007 Marcello A. Giorgi

An example...

I (A)

b

y * (mm)

b

x * (mm)

s

y * (

m

m)

s

x * (

m

m)

s

z (mm) L (cm -2 s -1 ) KEKB 1.7

6 300 3 80 6 1.7

x 10 34 SuperB 2.

0.3

20 0.035

6 5 1.

x 10 36 Here is Luminosity gain

SuperKEKB scheme

SuperKEKB is a more conventional machine, with a maximum peak luminosity that can approach 10

36

cm

2

s

-1

, but high circulating current is driving a wall power ≥80 MW and some severe limitation on detector due to the background.

Good relations between SuperB and SuperKEKB communities.( Simulation of SuperB made at KEK, cross participation at the workshops..)

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Comparison between machines current betay betax PEPII 2.5 A 10 mm 400 mm Emity (sigmay) 23 nm (~100 m m) y/x coupling (sigma y) Bunch length Tau l/t z L y 0,5-1 % (~6 m m) 10 mm 16/32 msec 0.07

1.2 10 34 October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi KEKB 1.7 A 6 mm 300 mm ~ the same (~80 m m) 0.1 % (~3 m m) 6 mm ~ the same 0.1

1.7 10 34 SuperB 2.3 A 0.3 mm 20 mm 1,6 nm (~6 m m) 0,25 % (0,035 m m) 6 mm 16/32 msec 0.16

1 10 36

rings studied with

Machine parameters

• Present parameter set based on ILCDR-like parameters 3.0 Km long ILC OCS (Baseline) lattice scaled to 4 and 7 GeV – Same DR emittances – Same DR bunch length – 1.5 times DR bunch charges – Same ILC-IP betas • Crossing angle and “crab waist” to maximize luminosity and minimize blowup – Test will start in Nov 2007 on DA • Final Focus (ILC-like) included and RF system – Corresponds to a lot of money  • Fewer and lower field wigglers used • Maximize Luminosity keeping low D NE.

• Use PEP-KEK DR damping time 17ms • Design based on recycling all PEP-II hardware, Bends, Quads and Sexts, E and wall power.

– Total power: 35 MW, as in PEP-II • Simulations performed in many places and different codes: – LNF,BINP,KEK,LAL,CERN October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

2,5 10 37 Luminosity [cm-2 s-1]

Upgradeable

2 10 37 1,5 10 37 1 10 37 5 10 36

10 36

0 0 2,5 10 10 5 10 10 M. Zobov, D. Shatilov 7,5 10 10 N 1 10 11 1,25 10 11 1,5 10 11 Number of particles/bunch SuperB can operate at 4.0 GeV c.o.m Energy at luminosity 10 35 A preliminary estimate of Wall Power is non unreasonable Current as is now in PEPII (can manage Background !) One polarized beam (e-) is considered for tau edm and CP studies The possibility of adding polarized positron is under study.

LUMINOSITY is upgradeable October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

The Detector

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Detector • • • Babar and Belle designs have proven to be very effective for B-Factory physics – Follow the same ideas for SuperB detector – Try to reuse same components as much as possible Main issues – Machine backgrounds – not much larger than in Babar/Belle – Beam energy asymmetry – a bit smaller – Strong interaction with machine design A SuperB detector is possible with today’s technology – Baseline is reusing large (expensive) parts of Babar (or Belle) – Quartz bars of the DIRC – Barrel EMC CsI(Tl) crystal and mechanical structure – Superconducting coil and flux return yoke.

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg • • Marcello A. Giorgi Some areas require moderate R&D and engineering developments to improve performance – Small beam pipe technology – Thin silicon pixel detector for first layer – Drift chamber CF mechanical structure, gas and cell size – Photon detection for DIRC quartz bars – Forward PID system (TOF or focusing RICH) – Forward calorimeter crystals (LSO) – Minos-style scintillator for Instrumented flux return – Electronics and trigger – need to revise Bfactory “½-track” trigger style – Computing – large data amount More details in: – www.pi.infn.it/SuperB/node/159 - SuperB Italy Meeting on detector R&D – indico.lal.in2p3.fr/conferenceDisplay.py?c

onfId=167 – Paris workshop (May 9-11)

Detector Layout – Reuse parts of Babar (or Belle)

BASELINE

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg

OPTION

Marcello A. Giorgi

The Process

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

The SuperB Process

• International SuperB Study Group on – Physics case, Machine, Detector • International steering committee established, chaired by M.A.G.. Members from – Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Russia, Spain, UK, US – Regular interaction with Japan, although not formalized • Regular workshops – Five workshop held (2 in Frascati, 1 in SLAC, 1 Villa Mondragone, 1 Paris) – SuperB Meeting at Daresbury – Accelerator retreat at SLAC in 2006 – Accelerator Retreat at SLAC Sep 17-21, 2007 • Conceptual Design Report – Ready, printed and distributed.

– Describe Physics case, Accelerator, Detector, including costing – International review ongoing • More information: www.pi.infn.it/SuperB – http://www.pi.infn.it/SuperB/seminars October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg CDR Ready !!!!

The CDR of SuperB is ready!

INFN/AE-07/02, SLAC-R-856, LAL 07-15 Available at: www.pi.infn.it/SuperB arxiv.org/abs/0709.0451

476 pages Printed and available Copies can be requested from [email protected]

Marcello A. Giorgi

Signatures: some numbers • 320 Signatures; 85 institutions Drop Page Fields Here Signatures breakdown by country • 174 Babar members – 65 non Babar exper. Experimentalists 75% Theorists 13% Accelerator physicists 12% Signatures

USA, 70 Australia, 1 Canada, 7 France, 21 Germany, 11 Israel, 2 UK, 24 Switzerland, 4 Spain, 12 Slovenia, 5 Russia, 18 ROC, 3 Norway, 1 Japan, 4 Italy, 137 Signatures breakdown by type

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

Signatures breakdown by country

Country Australia Canada France Germany Israel Italy Japan Norway ROC Russia Slovenia Spain Switzerland UK USA

CDR Review & Next Steps

• An International Review Committee has been appointed by INFN.

– John Dainton – UK/Daresbury, chair – Jacques Lefrancois – F/Orsay – Antonio Masiero – I/Padova – Rolf Heuer – D/ Desy – Daniel Schulte – CERN – Abe Seiden – USA/UCSC – Young-Kee Kim – USA/FNAL – Hiroaki Aihara – Japan/Tokyo • The review is scheduled for Nov 12-13, 2007.

• A first report is expected january 2008 (Meanwhile a “Physics Retreat” to update the physics case in Valencia January 7-15,2008) • The final report foreseen in spring 2008 – After the results of the LNF test of crab waist foreseen in fall 2007 • Already presented to ECFA in the summer – Very positive reaction • Presentation to the CERN strategy group foreseen in spring 2008 – Coordinates all projects in european HEP for research infrastructure •

INFRA-2007-2.2.1.33:

Projects in the European strategy for particle physics (CERN Council) October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

BACKUP

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg SuperB where ?

• The SuperB conceptual design is largely site independent • A possible site is on the Università di Roma Tor Vergata campus • Area available • Strong interest of University and INFN • Tunnel at about -12m • Synergy with approved FEL (SPARX) • Engineering group created • Feasibility study in preparation Marcello A. Giorgi

PARAMETER Particle type Energy (GeV) Luminosity x 10 36 Circumference (m) Revolution frequency (MHz) Eff. long. polarization (%) RF frequency (MHz) Harmonic number Momentum spread Momentum compaction Rf Voltage (MV) Energy loss/turn (MeV) Number of bunches Particles per bunch x10 10 Beam current (A) Beta y* (mm) Beta x* (mm) Emit y (pmr) Emit x (nmr) Sigma y* (microns) Sigma x* (microns) Bunch length (mm) Full Crossing angle (mrad) Wigglers (#) Damping time (trans/long)(ms) Luminosity lifetime (min) Touschek lifetime (min) Effective beam lifetime (min) Injection rate pps (100%) Tune shifts (x/y) (from formula) RF Power (MW)

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg

Nominal Parameters

BASELINE

LER HER Upgrade LER Parameters HER e+ 4 e 7 1 2250 0.13

0 476 3570 8.4E-04 1.8E-04 6 1.9

1733 6.16

2.28

0.30

20 4 1.6

0.035

5.657

6 34 4 32/16 10.4

5.5

3.6

4.9E+11 0.004/0.17

17 2250 0.13

80 476 3570 9.0E-04 3.0E-04 18 3.3

1733 3.52

1.30

0.30

20 4 1.6

0.035

5.657

6 34 2 32/16 5.9

38 5.1

2.0E+11 0.004/0.17

Marcello A. Giorgi

e+ 4 e 7 2.4

2250 0.13

0 476 3570 1.0E-03 1.8E-04 6 2.3

3466 5.34

3.95

0.20

20 2 0.8

0.020

4.000

6 34 4 25/12.5

7.4

2.9

2.1

1.5E+12 0.007/0.16

35 2250 0.13

80 476 3570 1.0E-03 3.0E-04 18 4.1

3466 2.94

2.17

0.20

20 2 0.8

0.020

4.000

6 34 4 25/12.5

4.1

19 3.4

5.0E+11 0.007/0.16

Ultimate Parameters LER HER e+ 4 e 7 3.4

2250 0.13

0 476 3570 1.0E-03 1.8E-04 7.5

2.3

3466 6.16

4.55

0.20

20 2 0.8

0.020

4.000

6 34 4 25/12.5

6.1

2.3

1.7

2.1E+12 0.009/0.2

44 2250 0.13

80 476 3570 1.0E-03 3.0E-04 18 4.1

3466 3.52

2.60

0.20

20 2 0.8

0.020

4.000

6 34 4 25/12.5

3.5

15 2.8

7.2E+11 0.009/0.2

GOAL

SUPERB somewhere in EUROPE as result of an international collaboration

One possible site is the University of Rome Tor Vergata

• Area available • Strong interest of University and INFN • Tunnel at about -12m • Synergy with approved FEL (SPARX) • Engineering group created • Issues: water, power October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

WBS

1 1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.6

1.7

Accelerator and site costs

Item

Accelerator Project management Magnet and support system Vacuum system RF system Interaction region Controls, Diagnostics, Feedback Injection and transport systems

Unitsmm

5429 2112 666 620 272 370 963 426

Labor mm

3497 96 1199 520 304 478 648 252

M\&S kEuro

191166 1800 28965 27600 22300 10950 12951 86600

Rep.Val.

kEuro

126330 0 25380 14200 60000 0 8750 18000

WBS

2.0

2.1

2.2

Item

Site Site Utilities Tunnel and Support Buildings

Unitsmm

1424 820 604

Labor mm

1660 1040 620

Note: site cost estimate not as detailed as other estimates.

M\&S kEuro

105700 31700 74000

Rep.Val.

kEuro

0 0 0

October 20, 2007 QWG07-Desy-Hamburg Marcello A. Giorgi

1.4

1.4.1

1.4.2

1.4.3

1.5

1.6

1.7

1.8

1.9

1.A

WBS

1 1.0

1.1

1.1.1

1.1.2

1.1.3

1.2

1.3

1.3.1

1.3.1

1.3.2

Detector cost

Item

SuperB detector Interaction region Tracker (SVT + L0 MAPS) SVT

L0 Striplet option

L0 MAPS option DCH PID (DIRC Pixilated PMTs + TOF) DIRC barrel - Pixilated PMTs

DIRC barrel - Focusing DIRC

Forward TOF EMC Barrel EMC Forward EMC Backward EMC IFR (scintillator) Magnet Electronics Online computing Installation and integration Project Management 136 20

73 42

56 87 286 1272 353 720

EDIA mm

3391 10 248 142

23

106 113 110 78

92

32 222 5

152 65

54 47 213 34 624 0

Labor mm

1873 4 348 317

33

32 104 222 152

179

70

M\&S kEuro Rep.Val.

kEuro

40747 46471 210 0 5615 4380

324

1235 2862 7953 4527

6959

3426 0 0

0

0 0 6728 6728

6728

0 10095 171

6828 3096

1268 1545 5565 1624 3830 180 30120 30120

0 0

0 9623 0 0 0 0

Note: options in italics are not summed. We chose to sum the options we considered most likely/necessary.

October 20, 2007 Marcello A. Giorgi QWG07-Desy-Hamburg