Development Results on the Ground: What works in Mutual Accountability in Uganda and Why? Presented at the ECOSOC 2012 Development Cooperation Forum 1st.

Download Report

Transcript Development Results on the Ground: What works in Mutual Accountability in Uganda and Why? Presented at the ECOSOC 2012 Development Cooperation Forum 1st.

Development Results on the Ground:
What works in Mutual Accountability in Uganda and Why?
Presented at the ECOSOC 2012 Development
Cooperation Forum 1st High-level Symposium
Bamako, Mali 5-6 May 2011
by
Timothy Lubanga,
Assistant Commissioner for Monitoring and Evaluation,
Office of the Prime Minister
Outline of the presentation
Introduction
 Key Elements of The Mutual Accountability
Framework
 Implications of Monitoring Framework
 Key messages and lessons

2
Introduction of the JBSF


History of Aid coordination mechanisms with varying degrees of
success
Government Performance Management Framework



Joint Budget Support Framework (JBSF) - long-term, transparent and
predictable framework for providing budget support that
Use of the National Performance Assessment System and Joint
Assessment Framework
 Harmonize Performance assessments
 Align budget support decisions to the national budget processes
 Improve the impact of Government spending and reduce
transaction costs in the delivery of aid.
New Partnership Policy sets out guiding principles and priorities to
manage the relationship with its Development Partners, within the
context of the National Development Plan (NDP)
3
The key elements of Mutual Accountability
Framework
Partnership Policy
 Highlights 4 broad objectives to improve the effectiveness of
development cooperation through greater government ownership
and leadership, strengthen economic management, accountability
and policy coherence
 Articulates the principles and the country’s policies on development
cooperation
 Highlights the roles of the various actors in the process of aid
management and coordination
 Contains a Monitoring Framework with a set of indicators for both
development partners(donors) and government to be agreed upon
by the parties and monitored on a regular basis
4
The key elements of Mutual Accountability
Framework
Enhanced coordination by Government, with leadership
provided at a high policy level
 Joint performance assessment based on a National
Performance Assessment built on extensive sectoral
reviews
 Focus on results and Value for Money
 Time table that is linked to the national budget cycle
 Memorandum of Understanding to be signed with
donors based on the Framework
 The use of key sectors to lead the process

5
The key elements of Mutual Accountability
Framework





Policy preconditions for effective and efficient
implementation of Government policies
Cross-cutting policy reforms to tackle systemic
performance impediments
Specific actions in service delivery sectors (Health,
Education,Water and Roads)
Mutual Accountability (Indicators being defined). There
will be indicators for each development partner within
the framework
Building on participation and leadership by Parliament,
CSOs Government at highest level (AAA)
6
Implications of MA Mechanism





The commitments under this framework are not just for
the sectors mentioned, but for the entire Economy,
inclusiveness
Effective peer pressure effect
National ownership of the exercise as emphasized in AAA
Monitoring Framework contains manageable number of
indicators (52) for the Country and Development
Partners (donors). Each sector has just 3 indicators
Improvement in development results in the key service
delivery sectors
7
Messages and Lessons





Strengthening of the Government Coordination and
performance management structures
Increased participation of the civil society and local
governments in the discussions as well as Cabinet
Provides an opportunity to review progress and address
challenges to improve performance
Platform for enhancing accountability to Parliament and by
Parliament
Improved learning within and across sectors
8
Key Messages and Lessons
Improved dialogue between Government and
Development Partners
 More predictable Budget Support, hence better
planning, budgeting e.t.c
 Strengthening Government systems – capacity
development
 Improved performance by sectors concerned
 Reduced transaction costs
 Harmonization

9
End
Thank you