RTF Custom Protocols: Background, Issues and Critical Elements February 8, 2012 Regional Technical Forum Subcommittee on Impact Evaluation and Custom Protocol Presented by: Michael Baker, SBW Consulting,
Download
Report
Transcript RTF Custom Protocols: Background, Issues and Critical Elements February 8, 2012 Regional Technical Forum Subcommittee on Impact Evaluation and Custom Protocol Presented by: Michael Baker, SBW Consulting,
RTF Custom Protocols:
Background, Issues and
Critical Elements
February 8, 2012
Regional Technical Forum
Subcommittee on Impact Evaluation and Custom Protocol
Presented by:
Michael Baker, SBW Consulting, Inc.
Jeffrey Romberger, SBW Consulting, Inc.
Richard Ridge, Ridge and Associates
How do the Existing RTF Guidelines
address Custom Protocol measures
Scope and Purpose – Definition of Method
Custom protocols are appropriate for measures that require sitespecific data collection and analysis in order to develop a reliable
estimate of savings. Highly skilled and experienced practitioners are
required … Custom protocols require site-specific documentation of
the data collected and how that data are used in estimating savings.
Measure Specification - Baseline
Current practice
Pre-condition
Custom Protocol – Guidance and Requirements
Required Knowledge and Skills of Practitioner
Site-Specific Savings Estimation Plan
Site-Specific Savings Report
February 8, 2012
2
Assumptions
Applicable to a broad range of non-residential measures
Independent of program design
Site-specific
Program administrators can add to the RTF requirements as needed by
their program
Program impact evaluation appendix would handle projects that involve
multiple sites
Does not address economic analysis or reporting
Incremental cost
Measure life
Energy costs (customer or utility)
Non-energy benefits
February 8, 2012
3
How High A Bar Should We Set?
Cost limits
Exempt sites below some size threshold?
Set maximum percentage of savings value?
IPMVP adherence
Post-period trend logs for important parameters that are time variant
Measure commissioning (installation and operation)
Baseline trend logs for important parameters
Prepared by or supervised by persons with relevant design / operational
experience
Transparent savings estimation
Public access to primary data, modeling and reports
Quantitative analysis of estimation uncertainties
February 8, 2012
4
How to Achieve Comparability with RTF
UES Measures
Primary issue is baseline definition
Guidelines define to types of baseline
Current Practice
Pre-Conditions
new equipment or practices…no remaining useful life…characterized by current
market practice or the minimum requirements of applicable codes or standards,
whichever is more efficient
measure-affected equipment or practice still has remaining useful life…typical existing
conditions found among eligible end users
How should custom measures treat Current Practice baseline
Code if applicable
Interview the customer about their standard practice
Collect broader market data
February 8, 2012
5
Summary of Recent BPA Protocol /
Guidelines Project
Background Research
Three Guidelines
Review of BPA current practices
Analysis of national best practices
Protocol selection
Regression
Sampling
Six Protocols
February 8, 2012
6
International Performance Measurement
and Verification Protocol (IPMVP)
IPMVP Options
A. Retrofit Isolation: Key Parameter Measurement
B. Retrofit Isolation: All Parameter Measurement
C. Whole Facility (or sub-facility)
D. Calibrated Simulation
Not mentioned in current RTF Guidelines
BPA has both adherent and non-adherent protocols and
explains in detail relationship to IPMVP requirements for
A, B and C. No adherent protocol for D.
February 8, 2012
7
BPA Protocols
One that is Not IPMVP-Adherent
Energy Calculation with Verification - ECwV (<200,000 kWh or special
cases)
Engineering Calculation - existing buildings
Simulation - existing and new (including additions and major remodels)
Five that are IPMVP-Adherent
Equipment or End-Use Metering Protocol (Opt. A and B)
End-Use Metering without Baseline (Opt. A)
Energy Use Indexing (Opt. B and C)
Energy Modeling (Opt. B and C)
Existing Building Commissioning (Opt. B and C)
February 8, 2012
8
BPA vs. RTF Documentation Requirements
BPA
RTF Guidelines
M&V Plan and Report
Baseline Conditions
ECM Intent
Measurement Boundary
Selected BPA Protocol
Baseline Energy Use
Measurements
Post-Installation Measurements
Description of Analysis Procedures
Responsibilities of Involved Parties
Savings Report Contents and
Frequency
February 8, 2012
Savings Estimation Plan
Not required
Savings Estimation Report
Measure Description
Measure Commissioning
Data Collection
Sampling Procedure
Savings Estimation
9
RTF Guidelines – Proposed Appendices
App A: Guidelines Checklist
App B: UES Measure Summary Sheet
App C: Standard Protocol Example and Template
(New) App D: Program Impact Evaluation Protocols
(New) App E: Estimating Savings for Custom Measures
(New) App F: Statistical Energy Modeling
(New) App G: Physical Energy Modeling
(New) App H: Sampling
(New) App I: Glossary
(New) App J: Curriculum Guide
February 8, 2012
10
Morphing BPA Guidelines/Protocols into
RTF Guidelines Appendices
App F: Statistical Energy Modeling
Site-Specific
Groups of Sites
BPA Regression guideline
Portions of other BPA protocols
Cross-sectional
Time-series cross-sectional
App G: Physical Energy Modeling
Bin (based on BPA ECwV Protocol)
Simulation (based on BPA ECwV Protocol)
App H: Sampling (based on BPA Sampling Guide)
App I: Glossary (based on BPA Glossary)
App J: Curriculum Guide (based on BPA examples throughout guidelines
and protocols)
February 8, 2012
11
Outline for Appendix E – Estimating
Savings for Custom Measures
Purpose
Eligible Measures
Measures Description
Measure Commissioning
Savings Estimation Plan
Sampling Techniques
Data Collection Methods
Savings Estimation Methods
Savings Estimation Report
Quality Control
February 8, 2012
12
Appendix J – Curriculum Guide
Built on BPA examples throughout guidelines and
protocols
Partners
BOC
DOE
ASHRAE
AESP
Format
On-line, self paced
Class-room
February 8, 2012
13