Americas ILC-Americas Regional Program G. Dugan ILC/GDE and Cornell University P5 meeting Apr. 20, 2006 20 April 06 P5 meeting Global design effort.

Download Report

Transcript Americas ILC-Americas Regional Program G. Dugan ILC/GDE and Cornell University P5 meeting Apr. 20, 2006 20 April 06 P5 meeting Global design effort.

Americas
ILC-Americas Regional
Program
G. Dugan
ILC/GDE and Cornell University
P5 meeting
Apr. 20, 2006
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
1
Outline
Americas
• Organization of the Americas Regional Team
– GDE Misson
– MoU process; FY06 budgets
– Reviews
• FY06 Program
– FY06 ILC R&D program highlights, including
university R&D program
• Outlook for FY07 and beyond
• Conclusion
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
2
International Linear Collider
Americas
The Global Design Effort
Mission
• Produce a design for the ILC that includes a detailed
design concept, performance assessments, reliable
international costing, an industrialization plan, and a siting
analysis, as well as detector concepts and scope.
• Coordinate worldwide prioritized proposal driven R & D
efforts (to demonstrate and improve the performance,
reduce the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
3
ILC Program Execution
Americas
In the Americas region, the ILC program (the RDR effort, and supporting
ILC R&D), is executed by the Americas Regional Team.
ILC-Americas Regional Team Leaders
ANL-Kwang-Je Kim
BNL-Mike Harrison
Fermilab-Bob Kephart, Shekar Mishra, Sergei Nagaitsev
Cornell LEPP- Hasan Padamsee, Mark Palmer
Jefferson Lab -Swapan Chattopadahay, Warren Funk
LLNL -Jeff Gronberg
LBNL -Mike Zisman, Christine Celata
SLAC -Tor Raubenheimer, Nan Phinney, Tom Himel
TRIUMF - Shane Koscielniak
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Universities- Project Leaders
Global design effort
4
Organization of the ILC-Americas Program
Americas
• The work is broken down into a series of technically-based work
packages.
• GDE and each DoE lab sign MoU’s detailing the co-operative
arrangement for the execution of work packages at each lab.
• Yearly scope of work is spelled out in Addenda to the MoU, which
detail the work packages.
• For university R&D work, each university project is a work package.
• Labs report financial status at the work package level quarterly, and
technical status semi-annually.
• About 100 work packages for FY06 are organized into a WBS.
• The list of work packages, and associated resources, as well as the
MOU Addenda, are posted on the ILC-Americas web site:
https://wiki.lepp.cornell.edu/ilc/bin/view/Public/Americas/WebHome
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
5
FY06 budgets: Breakdown by Machine Area
Americas
M A C H I N E A RE A
P rogram direc tion and adminis tration
M anagement
G lobal s ys tems
E lec tron s ourc es
P os itron s ourc es
D amping rings
Bunc h c ompres s or
M ain Linac s : O ptic s , beam dynamic s , ins trumentation
M ain Linac s : RF s ys tems
M ain Linac s : C avities and C ryomodules
Beam delivery s ys tem
C onventional fac ilities
T ec hnic al Sys tems
Res erve
DOE FY06
DOE FY06
NSF FY06
M&S
Tota l
FTE
Direct
Tota l
9 .5 0
$766
$ 3 ,0 0 6
$326
4 .1 0
$100
$761
$0
4 .4 7
$519
$ 1 ,1 5 8
$0
3 .3 5
$100
$658
$0
1 0 .3 2
$159
$ 1 ,9 8 8
$0
9 .6 3
$509
$ 2 ,1 3 5
$0
1 .3 0
$0
$214
$0
5 .7 4
$75
$988
$0
1 6 .8 4
$ 1 ,4 5 1
$ 4 ,4 1 0
$0
1 6 .9 0
$ 3 ,9 6 1
$ 7 ,3 8 0
$242
1 4 .3 8
$376
$ 2 ,7 9 6
$0
2 .6 9
$519
$ 1 ,0 3 9
$0
0 .0 0
$590
$870
$0
$ 2 ,4 3 7
99.23
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
$9,126
$29,841
$568
6
FY06 budgets: Breakdown by Laboratory
Americas
La b/Uni v
SLA C
FN A L
A NL
J lab
J lab (F N A L M O U )
LLNL
L L N L (S L A C M O U )
LBN L
BN L
C ornell (FN A L M O U )
U NIV
D O E /G D E
sum
DOE FY06
DOE FY06
NSF FY06
M&S
Tota l
FTE
Di rect
Tota l
5 6 .1 8
$ 2 ,6 8 3
$ 1 2 ,3 0 0
$0
3 0 .0 0
$ 6 ,0 4 6
$ 1 2 ,6 0 0
$0
3 .4 0
$27
$300
$0
1 .0 0
$136
$400
$0
$600
$600
$0
2 .2 5
$180
$ 1 ,0 0 0
$0
0 .4 2
$50
$200
$0
2 .4 8
$30
$500
$0
3 .5 0
$25
$600
$0
$165
$165
$0
0 .0 0
$0
$280
$568
$ 1 ,8 6 0
$0
99.23
$9,126
$29,841
$568
Most labs are also putting additional funds into ILC R&D. For example,
Fermilab is devoting an additional ~$12 M to developing SCRF
infrastructure.
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
7
ILC-Americas University FY05 R&D Program
Americas
• SCRF materials and surface preparation: Wisconsin ($64K),
Northwestern($40K), Old Dominion ($58K)
• RF power sources: Yale ($60K), MIT($30K)
• Polarized electron source: Wisconsin ($35K)
• Polarized positron source: Tennessee ($40K), Princeton
• Damping rings: Illinois ($17K), Cornell ($75K, $46K) [NSF]
• Instrumentation, diagnostics: Berkeley ($35K), Cornell ($24K) [NSF]
• Mover systems: Colorado State ($49K) [NSF]
• Radiation hard electronics: UC Davis ($38K), Ohio State ($75K)
• Ground motion: Northwestern ($28K)
• Linac beam dynamics design-Cornell ($21K)
• High-gradient SCRF R&D- Cornell ($140K)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
8
Reviews
Americas
DoE/NSF review-April 4-6, 2006
Chairs: Paul Grannis (DoE), Jon Kotcher (NSF)
Consultants:
Ilan Ben-Zvi (BNL)
George Mulholland (Applied
Cryo Technology)
Don Hartill (Cornell)
Katsunobu Oide (KEK)
Tom Elioff (SLAC)
Dixon Bogert (FNAL)
Ferdi Willeke (DESY)
Agenda and talks:
http://ilcagenda.cern.ch/confer
enceDisplay.py?confId=159
Report should be available in
a few weeks
FY06 University Accelerator R&D program was also reviewed and
prioritized in early February, by an ad-hoc GDE review committee, and
results went to DoE and NSF
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
9
Americas
Global Systems
• System availability studies (SLAC)
• Design of high availability hardware (SLAC, LLNL)
– Kickers, Power supplies, diagnostics, and control
system
Fast
(redundant)
kicker for
DR
• General control system design (ANL, Fermilab,
SLAC)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
10
Sources
Americas
•
Laser and cathode for polarized electron source (SLAC)
•
NC structures: design and test (SLAC)
•
•
Undulator design, E166 (SLAC, Cornell)
Positron capture
structures
Positron Source simulations (ANL)
• A comprehensive start-to-end simulation of conventional,
polarized, and keep-alive sources.
• Positron target design (LLNL)
– Detailed engineering
– Target simulations
• Energy deposition
• radiation damage, activation
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
11
Damping rings
Americas
• Damping ring component optimization: wigglers, fast kickers;
studies of the use of CESR as an ILC positron damping ring test
facility (in 2008) (Cornell)
• Damping Ring Design and Optimization (ANL)
– Lattice design and optimization; particle tracking for singlebunch instabilities with 3-D wakefield; studies of ion instability
in the APS ring; design of a hybrid wiggler satisfying the field
quality tolerance
• SEY studies in PEP-II (SLAC)
• ATF damping ring experiments (SLAC, LBNL, Cornell)
• Lattice designs for damping rings and injection/extraction lines;
characterization of some collective effects, including spacecharge, IBS and microwave instability; physics design of stripline
kickers for single-bunch extraction at KEK-ATF (LBNL)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
12
RTML and Main Linac Optics, beam dynamics, instrumentation
Americas
• RTML design (SLAC, Cornell)
• Main linac optics design (SLAC, Fermilab)
• Low emittance transport simulations and BBA
design (SLAC, Fermilab, Cornell)
• Wakefield calculations (SLAC)
• Linac beamline Instrumentation (SLAC)
signal from ACC1, cav 1, cplr 2
1.4
TTF HOM
Signal
800 monitors
installed
1.3
1.2
1.1
Volts
1
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
time - s
20 April 06
P5 meeting
3
3.5
4
RF BPM
for linac
4.5
-4
x 10
Global design effort
13
Main Linac RF sources
Americas
• Linac rf sources (SLAC, LLNL)
Marx generator modulator
• SLAC End Station B (RF Test Fac.)
•
Develop 5 MW station in FY06, and 10 MW station later
– Test rf system components
– Reuses extensive infrastructure
• Coupler Test Stand (LLNL)
– Evaluation and analysis of RF
coupler designs
• Linac SC quad and BPM (SLAC)
• Studies of magnetic center stability with excitation
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
14
ILC Cavities and test facilities
Americas
Joint
ANL/FNAL
BCP/EP
Facility
•
•
•
•
•
•
Meson
Detector
Building
(MDB)
TD MP9
Cryomodule
Assembly
Facility (CAF)
Industrial fabrication of cavities (12 cavities in FY06) (FNAL)
BCP and vertical testing (FNAL, Cornell)
EP process development and vertical testing (FNAL, Jlab).
Joint BCP/EP facility being developed at ANL (late 06)
Horizontal test facility @ FNAL (ILCTA-MDB) (complete Fall 06)
Vertical test facility under development @ FNAL (ILCTA-IB1)
(complete 07)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
15
Cryomodule Design
Americas
• Industrial fabrication and cost reduction of the ILC cryomodule
are both crucial issues for a realistic ILC cost estimate
• In FY05 Fermilab started on converting drawings of the
DESY/INFN design of the ILC cryomodule (Type-III+) to US
standards for U.S. vendor fabrication and for cost reduction.
• IN FY06, as part of a co-ordinated global effort, design has
started for an improved ILC cryomodule (Type-IV).
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
16
Cryomodule string test: ILCTA-NML at Fermilab
Americas
New Muon Lab
(NML)
FNPL Photo-Injector
Building a dedicated ILC cryomodule string test facility in the New Muon
Lab
– Building is cleaned out except for removal of CCM ( in progress)
– Started to install cryogenic system-complete in FY07
– Move FNPL Photo-injector to provide electron beam (FY07)
– Upgraded FNPL will provide beam tests of ILC cryomodules (FY08
and 09)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
17
High gradient cavity R&D
Americas
Jlab: Fabricate, process and test cavities from
large-grain/single-crystal material)
• Objectives (not a complete list):
– Several single cell and at least one multi-cell cavity made from
large grain/single crystal niobium and BCP processed.
– Test cavity for superconducting rf joint investigations;
– Two cavities suitable to be combined into a superstructure
Cornell LEPP: ILC high-gradient SCRF
• Re-entrant Cavity Shape:
- 47 MV/m at Cornell…Later 52 MV/m at KEK
- 9-cell re-entrant cavity ordered from AES
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
18
Beam Delivery System
Americas
• Beam delivery system design (SLAC)
• ATF-2 (SLAC)
• Construction of magnets, PS, and instrumentation
• ESA MDI Test Facility (SLAC)
• NanoBPM for ATF2 (LLNL)
• ILC Final Focus Magnet Development (BNL)
• Continue to support the baseline design efforts, and the
development of the Conceptual Design/Cost Estimate for the Beam
Delivery System
• Fabricate and test a short proof of principle shielded final-focus-like
quadrupole coil
• Fabricate and test a short proof of principle sextupole/octupole
corrector-like coil
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
19
ILC Civil Design for the RDR
Americas
• Design to “sample sites” from
each region
– Americas – near Fermilab
– Japan
– Europe – CERN & DESY
• Americas Site - in Illinois–
location may vary from the
Fermilab site west to near
DeKalb
• Design efforts ongoing at
Fermilab and SLAC
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
20
Potential TRIUMF Accelerator R&D Resources for ILC
Americas
The specific nature of Canadian involvement is under development.
Some potential collaboration areas have been identified, along with
relevant LHC experience:
The design of kicker magnets and the construction of associated pulseforming networks and fast switches using power semiconductors
Precision room temperature magnet systems
Beam instrumentation and readout systems
Contributions to beam dynamics & lattice calculations for damping rings.
Remote handling design/consulting of target stations possible
applicability to conventional positron source
Peripheral aspects of superconducting r.f., such as cryogenic coolant
distribution system, design/consulting, small quantity e-beam welding of
niobium
Vibration control systems and alignment of components for final focus
system; also interest in abort kickers
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
21
FY07 outlook
Americas
• PB doubles ILC program budget to $60M (This
includes ILC detector R&D at labs and universities)
• However, the requested (“technically limited”) program
(~$98M) exceeds the available funding. A process of
prioritization will be required.
• This process should look to GDE for guidance on
priorities. Advice will be sought from GDE R&D Board
for general ILC R&D efforts, and from Linear Collider
Steering Group for the Americas (LCSGA) for regionspecific Americas bid-to-host related activities.
• First steps: document FY07 lab program requests
(April 24); Regional team meeting to discuss FY07
requests and future plans (May 3-4, SLAC)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
22
FY07 program: lab requests
Americas
DoE
FY06 Budget
DoE
FY07 Lab Requests
M A C H I N E A RE A
FTE
M&S (Direct)
P rogram direc tion and adminis tration
9.5
$766
M anagement
4.1
$100
G lobal s ys tems
4.5
$519
E lec tron s ourc es
3.4
$100
P os itron s ourc es
10.3
$159
D amping rings
9.6
$509
Ring to M ain L inac
1.3
$0
M ain Linac s : O ptic s , beam dynamic s , ins trumentation
5.7
$75
M ain Linac s : RF s ys tems
16.8
$1,451
M ain Linac s : C avities and C ryomodules
16.9
$3,961
Beam delivery s ys tem
14.4
$376
C onventional fac ilities
2.7
$519
T ec hnic al Sys tems (T D R E ngineering)
0.0
$590
Res erve (inc l univers ity program)
Bid to hos t
TOTAL
20 April 06
P5 meeting
99.2
$9,126
Total
$3,006
$761
$1,158
$658
$1,988
$2,135
$214
$988
$4,410
$7,380
$2,796
$1,039
$870
$2,437
$29,841
Global design effort
FTE M&S (Direct) Total
12.4
$1,173
$4,030
2.3
$0
$425
26.0
$1,645
$6,349
8.8
$810
$2,550
9.1
$948
$3,182
16.2
$725
$4,685
1.2
$0
$222
11.5
$250
$2,119
27.5
$6,907 $12,991
86.0
$15,708 $31,637
28.0
$1,401
$6,219
1.0
$550
$822
53.7
$450
$8,574
$4,000
6.0
$8,200 $10,484
289.5
$38,765
$98,289
23
FY07 ILC program requests
Americas
•
•
•
•
•
•
TDR engineering efforts (~50 FTE)
Cavity and cryomodule work
RF system development
Sources, Damping rings, beam delivery
Global systems
Technical R&D in support of the US regional
interest (“bid-to-host”: to be developed by
LCSGA panel)
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
24
Cavities, cryomodules and test infrastructure
Americas
• Fabricate (in industry) and process (at labs) 12 more ILC high-gradient
cavities; continue R&D on large-grain and high-gradient cavities.
• Continue R&D on EP processing, field emission/dark current issues,
thin film systems; develop EP facility at ANL.
• Horizontally test 10 cavities at Fermilab.
• Build first US-built cryomodule and receive parts for 2nd cryomodule
(to be built in FY08).
• Complete design of Type IV (ILC-style) cryomodule.
• Complete vertical test facility, and second horizontal test facility, at
Fermilab (IB1).
• Install cryogenic systems support for cryomodule tests in Fermilab’s
ILCTA-NML.
• Upgrade and move Fermilab photoinjector to ILCTA-NML.
• Purchase 10 MW klystron and another bouncer modulator for ILCTANML at Fermilab
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
25
Linac RF systems
Americas
• Continue development of Marx modulator, and
evaluation of DTI and SNS modulators: downselect
modulator choice by end of FY07.
• Purchase two 10 MW klystrons from CPI and Toshiba.
Contract with CPI to develop a high-efficiency 5 MW
klystron. Fabricate two sheet-beam klystron prototypes,
following SLAC design (split funding in FY07 and FY08).
Goal is klystron choice by end of FY08.
• Investigate cost reduction options for RF distribution
system and couplers.
• Continue development of LLRF systems
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
26
Technical R&D in support of the US regional interest
Americas
Civil design
• Begin design studies to fully develop an expression of
interest for an American site for the ILC
Industrialization
• Initiate procurements for the fabrication of the first of
three complete RF units (cavities, cryomodules, RF
system components) by industrial firms in the Americas.
Cavity processing and cryomodule assembly would use
existing lab infrastructure.
These “placeholders” to be reviewed by LCSGA panel charged
with developing a plan for technical R&D in support of the US
regional interest
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
27
Beyond FY07-Speculation
Americas
• For FY08 and 09, one can make a crude speculative
extrapolation from the FY07 requests.
• For FY08, increase the R&D efforts in most areas, and
substantially increase Technical Systems (the TDR engineering
efforts). Infrastructure, continues at the same level, roughly, while
accelerator design, is reduced a bit as the effort shifts more to
engineering.
• Most of the growth appears in “bid to host”, where the civil work
increases, as well as the funding for industrially produced RF
units.
• The same trends continue into FY09. At the end of FY09, the total
civil work for the bid to host is about $30M, corresponding roughly
to a CDR for the civil design of the US ILC site. The $46M of
industrial effort has produced 3 RF units, corresponding to enough
components for a 3 GeV linac. (Detailed plan to be worked out by
LCSGA panel).
• No funding is allocated here for actually assembling these
components into a linac, for example as a systems integration
demonstration.
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
28
Beyond FY07-Speculation
Americas
M A C H I NE A RE A
DOE FY07
Tota l
P rogram direc tion and adminis tration
$ 4 ,0 3 0
M anagement
$425
G lobal s ys tems
$ 6 ,3 4 9
E lec tron s ourc es
$ 2 ,5 5 0
P os itron s ourc es
$ 3 ,1 8 2
D amping rings
$ 4 ,6 8 5
Ring to M ain L inac
$222
M ain L inac s : O ptic s , beam dynamic s , ins trumentation
$ 2 ,1 1 9
M ain L inac s : RF s ys tems
$ 1 2 ,9 9 1
M ain L inac s : C avities and C ryomodules
$ 3 1 ,6 3 7
Beam delivery s ys tem
$ 6 ,2 1 9
C onventional fac ilities
$822
T ec hnic al Sys tems
$ 8 ,5 7 4
Res erve
$ 4 ,0 0 0
Bid to hos t
$ 1 0 ,4 8 4
TOTA L
20 April 06
P5 meeting
$98,289
-------------DOE FY08
Tota l
$ 3 ,3 0 0
$350
$ 5 ,5 0 0
$ 1 ,7 0 0
$ 3 ,5 0 0
$ 5 ,7 0 0
$200
$ 1 ,5 0 0
$ 1 1 ,0 0 0
$ 3 4 ,0 0 0
$ 8 ,5 0 0
$ 1 ,0 0 0
$ 1 6 ,5 0 0
$ 4 ,5 0 0
$ 3 0 ,0 0 0
$127,250
Global design effort
DOE FY09
Tota l
$ 3 ,6 0 0
$400
$ 5 ,1 0 0
$ 1 ,6 0 0
$ 2 ,5 0 0
$ 2 ,9 0 0
$100
$ 1 ,0 0 0
$ 1 2 ,0 0 0
$ 3 4 ,0 0 0
$ 6 ,5 0 0
$500
$ 2 0 ,2 5 0
$ 4 ,5 0 0
$ 3 5 ,0 0 0
$129,950
3-y ea r
Tota l
$ 1 0 ,9 3 0
$ 1 ,1 7 5
$ 1 6 ,9 4 9
$ 5 ,8 5 0
$ 9 ,1 8 2
$ 1 3 ,2 8 5
$522
$ 4 ,6 1 9
$ 3 5 ,9 9 1
$ 9 9 ,6 3 7
$ 2 1 ,2 1 9
$ 2 ,3 2 2
$ 4 5 ,3 2 4
$ 1 3 ,0 0 0
$ 7 5 ,4 8 4
$355,489
29
Conclusions
Americas
• A vigorous R&D program, in support of the GDE goals, is
underway in FY06 at national labs and universities throughout the
Americas region. The Americas Regional Team is also playing a
major role in the development of the ILC RDR and cost estimate.
• For FY06, challenges remain in completion of the RDR and cost
estimate this year, in cavity processing and klystron R&D, and in
effective co-ordination of the regional R&D programs.
• Next year, as the project enters the TDR phase, a significant
increase in resources will allow development of the TDR,
expansion of the R&D program, and the start of efforts to develop
the Americas region bid to host the ILC.
• The requested resources for an FY07 technically limited program
exceed those expected to be available.
• Top-down extrapolations from FY07 to FY08 and FY09 can be
made, but are highly speculative at this point.
20 April 06
P5 meeting
Global design effort
30