Benefits and Risks of ART Dr Paula Munderi WHO Training Course for Introducing Pharmacovigilance of HIV Medicines 23 - 28 November 2009, Dar Es.
Download ReportTranscript Benefits and Risks of ART Dr Paula Munderi WHO Training Course for Introducing Pharmacovigilance of HIV Medicines 23 - 28 November 2009, Dar Es.
Benefits and Risks of ART Dr Paula Munderi WHO Training Course for Introducing Pharmacovigilance of HIV Medicines 23 - 28 November 2009, Dar Es Salaam Summary Progress in ART coverage - WHO Progress Report Benefits of ART Survival Decreased Morbidity Decreased Transmission Vertical & Horizontal Principles of ART Measurement of efficacy Risks of ART linked to AEs and Toxicities Adherence : determinant of ART efficacy Special Populations : Women & Children Epidemiology of Paediatric HIV Pregnancy and ART Co-morbidities of specific concern : TB, HepB, Hep C, (Malaria) Programme implications Selection of ARVs in the PH approach ART principles & recommendations Current ART practice in LMIC What this means for countries Acknowledgements Sources of Slide Material Published data WHO progress report on access 2009 Jens Lundgren Lynne Moffenson WHO HQ - HIV Dept (ATC team) DART study group I Benefits of ART •Improved Survival •Reduced morbidity •Reduced vertical transmission of HIV •Possibly – reduced horizontal transmission of HIV Number of people receiving antiretroviral therapy in low- and middle-income countries, by region, 2002–2008 4.5 North Africa and the Middle East 4.0 Europe and Central Asia 3.5 East, South and South-East Asia Latin America and the Caribbean 3.0 Millions Sub-Saharan Africa 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 End 2002 End 2003 End 2004 End 2005 End 2006 End 2007 End 2008 Reduced Death rates over time on ART Rate per 100 person years 0-1 years 17.9 [14.5 – 22.1] 1-2 years 2.3 [14.5 – 22.1] 2-3 years 1.2 [0.5-3.3] Castelnuovo B, Manabe YC, Kiragga A et al CID 2009; 49:965–72 Survival impact of ART Proportion alive 1.0 0.8 0.95 0.92 0.90 0.94 0.90 0.87 DART cohort ART: 2003 - 2008 LCM: 2.2/100 PY CDM: 2.9/100 PY median CD4 86 at enrolment 0.55 0.6 -----------------0.4 Entebbe Cohort (same community) 0.18 0.2 0.08 NO ART available 1996-2000 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 Years from enrolment into cohort 5 median CD4 75 at enrolment 57.7/100 PY DART Study Group. IAS July 2009 Impact of ART on causes of death Specific HIV-related causes Pre-ART cohort: EC n = 516 PYO = 658 Post-ART cohort: DART n = 1015 PYO = 1819 Oct 95 - Dec 00 Feb 03 - Jan 06 Deaths (rate/100PY) Deaths (rate/100PY) 118 (17.9) 27 (1.5) Cryptococcus 64 (9.7) 4 (0.2) Cryptosporidium 18 (2.7) 2 (0.1) Tuberculosis 16 (2.4) 10 (0.5) HIV-related malignancy 11 (1.7) 6 (0.3) Bacteraemia 3 (0.5) 5 (0.3) CMV 4 (0.6) 0 (0) Severe anaemia 2 (0.3) 0 (0) Syndrome likely HIV related 176 (26.7) 18 (1.0) Wasting (+/- diarrhoea) 111 (16.9) 1 (0.1) Febrile event 48 (7.3) 12 (0.7) Neurological event 17 (2.6) 5 (0.3) 4 (0.6) 6 (0.3) 82 (12.6) 11 (0.6) 380 (57.7) 62 (0.3) Cause not HIV-related Unknown cause Total deaths DART Study Group: XVI INTERNATIONAL AIDS CONFERENCE 2006 Malaria – DART cohort Vertical Transmission – Maternal Viral Load in absence of ART % Transmission 40 32% 30 21% 20 11% 10 6% 1% 0 <400 4003000 300040000 40000100000 >100000 Delivery Plasma HIV RNA Blattner W. XIII AIDS Conf, July 2000, Durban S Africa (LBOr4) WITS study, 1990-1999 Timing of vertical transmission for 30% 15 % 10% 5% Pregnancy Pre-natal DE LIV ER Y Breast-feeding Post-natal Vertical Transmission at 6 weeks postpartum by ARV Regimen Botswana National Data Oct 2006-Nov 2007 Tlale J et al. IAS Mexico City Aug 2008 (Abs ThAC04) 15% Most Women Formula Feed Their Infants 12.3% 10% 5% 7.0% 4.7% 3.3% 0.7% 2.3% cART pre-preg cART during preg 0% sdNVP AZT AZT >4 wk <4 wk +sdNVP +sdNVP No ART Vertical transmission of HIV 15-35% <1% Antenatal screen Maternal ART Neonatal ART C. section No breastfeeding « Les personnes séropositives ne souffrant d’aucune autre MST et suivant un traitement antirétroviral efficace ne transmettent pas le VIH par voie sexuelle » Commission fédérale pour les problèmes liés au sida (CFS), Commission d’experts clinique et thérapie VIH et sida de l’Office fédéral de la santé publique (OFSP) P Vernazza, B Hirschel, E Bernasconi, M Flepp. Bulletin des médecins suisses 2008;89: 5 Scientific basis: Effective ART → undetectable HIV - RNA Epidemiologic basis : vertical transmission is related to plasma HIV-RNA • e.g PMTCT Longitudinal studies in HIV sero-discordant couples Rwanda & Zambia 393 couples followed for 14 years no transmission from person on cART 8.6 % transmission with no cART 1 --------------------------------------------------93 couples; in 41 +ve partner on cART 6 infections – all in non treated 2 --------------------------------------------------62 couples; Males +ve pregnancy desired no infection in female partner3 • • • • • • 2, 993 couples followed from 2002 – 2008 HIV testing every 3 months 5’609 person years 4 HIV infections from partners on cART 171 infections partners not on cART Incidence density of HIV transmission 4 0.7% on cART vs 3.4% off cART [RR = 0.21, CI: 0.08, 0.59] NB: HIV persists in semen and cervicovaginal fluid during effective cART ARVs for Prevention • PEP & PMTCT • Universal Test & Treat – combination ART • Pre- Exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) – Tenofovir • ARVs as “ vaginal microbicides” – Tenofovir – Maraviroc II Principles of ART •Combination therapy •Avoidance of resistance •Importance of adherence For sustained efficacy of ART ... • synergistic combinations of 3 active drugs usually from 2 different classes – single or dual drug therapy only in PMTCT; low risk PEP • the large number of possible combinations is only apparent – – cross resistance develops within classes Cross resistance may occur between NRTIs and NNRTIs • preserving future treatment options is critical – choice of initial regimen – rational sequencing of combinations thereafter Measurement of efficacy of ART When is treatment working? • Absence of clinical disease – WHO clinical staging • Immune restoration – Rise in CD4 count • Viral suppression – Undetectable VL When has treatment failed • Recurrence of clinical illness – WHO stage II/III/IV • Fall in CD4 count – to below 100 cells/mm3 • Detectable VL – to >5000 copies/ml Resistant virus 10-20% Wild-type virus Resistant virus 10-20% Wild-type virus Drug pressure Adherence – Efficacy Nachega et al, Ann Intern Med, 2007 III Risks of ART Mainly related to toxicities NB: Most ART Toxicities are ... - Predictable - Clinically detectable - Can be managed The key is patient and provider education ! Italian Cohort I C O N A Naive Antiretroviral Main reasons of discontinuation of first cART regimen within 1st year: ICONA cohort Toxicity Failure Non-adherence Other Continued Monforte et al. AIDS 1999 Reasons for change of a first combination ART regimen Reason N CD4 VL Unknown 49 312 2.26 Other 112 391 2.60 Choice 189 364 2.60 Toxicities 190 386 2.28 Failure 3.78 86 328 p=0.27 p<0.0001 N Median CD4 Median VL 107 300 3.26 87 326 2.81 133 382 2.60 161 363 2.46 138 418 2.60 p=0.0013 p=0.0022 EuroSIDA: Mocroft et al, AIDS Research Hum Retro, 2005 ART Toxicity related deaths: 1st year - 1 Hepatotoxicity, 2 Lactic acidosis 2nd year - 1 Hepatotoxicity; 2 lactic acidosis; 1 pancreatitis Castelnuovo B, Manabe YC, Kiragga A et al CID 2009; 49:965–72 NB: Most ART Toxicities are ... - Predictable - Clinically detectable - Can be managed The key is patient and provider education ! IV Women & Children •Pregnancy • In utero & Perinatal exposure to ARVs • cART in children Incidence of Seroconversion in Pregnancy: Prevention of HIV in Pregnant Women is Critical Country Reference Incidence per 100 Pt-Yrs Pregnancy Uganda Gray R et al. Lancet 2005;366:1182 2.3 Botswana Lu L et al. 2009 CROI Abs.94LB 1.3 (0.5-3.1) Zimbabwe, Uganda Morrison CS et al. AIDS 2007;21:1027 1.6 South Africa Rehle T et al. S Afr Med J 2007;97:194 5.2 (0-12.9) South Africa Moodley D et al. AIDS 2009;23:1255 10.7 (8.2-13.1) 43% of New Infant Infections in Botswana May be Due to Maternal Seroconversion in Pregnancy/PP Lu L et al . 16th CROI, Montreal, Canada Feb 2009 Abs 94LB # HIV+ women Estimated MTCT rate # infected infants HIV diagnosed before or during ANC New maternal infection late pregnancy New maternal infection 1 yr postpartum 13,952 378 450 (incidence 1.3%) (incidence 1.8%) 73% 36% 276 186 4.7% (with PMTCT ARV) 620 Of the estimated 1,082 infant HIV infections in Botswana in 2007, 462 (43%) were due to incident cases of maternal HIV in pregnancy/PP Prevention of HIV in Women, (Especially Young Women) Prevention of Unintended Pregnancies in HIV-Infected Women Prevention of Transmissio n from an HIV-Infected Woman to Her Infant Support for HIV-Infected Mother and Family Unintended Pregnancy Among HIV-Infected Women • 51% unintended pregnancies among women with HIV in Cote d’Ivoire. • 74% unintended pregnancies among women in HIV care in Rwanda. • 84% unintended pregnancies among PMTCT clients in South Africa. • 93% unintended pregnancies among women in HIV-ART Desgrees-du-Lou A et al. Int J STD AIDS 2002 care in Uganda. Bangendanye, 3rd Ped CLS 2007 Rochet T et al. JAMA 2006 Homsy J et al. PLosOne 2009 Incident pregnancy on ART – DART cohort Age at enrolment 18-29 yrs 30-34 yrs 35-39 yrs 40-44 yrs All women <45 18 16 Incidence rate per 100 woman years 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 <1 year 1-2 years 2-3 years 3-4 years Time since enrolment in DART >4 years Physiologic Changes During Pregnancy Can Affect Therapeutic Drug Administration • Increased plasma volume – dilution effect • Decreased in serum albumin – increase in free fraction of drug • Increased GFR 20-60% starting 1st trimester – change in drug clearance • Changes in hepatic enzyme activity – increase CYP34A, 2D6 = change in drug metabolism • Decreased gastric acid secretion, prolonged gastric emptying and intestinal transit time – decreased oral drug absorption Pregnancy & Antiretroviral Pharmacokinetics NRTIs Abacavir Didanosine Emtricitabine Lamivudine Stavudine Zidovudine No ∆ No ∆ No ∆ No ∆ No ∆ No ∆ NNRTIs Efavirenz No data Etravirine No data Nevirapine No ∆ NUCLEOTIDES Tenofovir AUC PIs Atazanavir AUC Darunavir No data Fosamprenavir AUC ? Indinavir AUC Lopinavir/rit AUC Nelfinavir AUC Ritonavir AUC Saquinavir AUC Tipranavir No data FUSION INHIBITORS Enfuvirtide No data CCR5 CO-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS Maraviroc No data INTEGRASE INHIBITORS Raltegravir No data Toxicity - associations in pregnancy Maternal Foetal • d4T / ddI – lactic acidosis • EFAVIRENZ – neural tube defects • NEVIRAPINE – hepatic toxicity • TENOFOVIR – bone growth defects • ZIDOVUDINE – anaemia Antiretroviral Pregnancy Registry 1/89- 1/09 Prospective Cases (http://www.APRegistry.com) % Birth Defect CDC general birth defect surveillance 1st trimester any ARV exposure Atazanavir sulfate-containing (7/292) ABC-containing (18/608) AZT-containing (95/3108) 3TC-containing (93/3226) d4T-containing (19/754) Indinavir-containing (6/276) Nelfinavir-containing (37/1074) Nevirapine-containing (18/817) Ritonavir-containing (20/883) Lopinavir-containing (8/470) Tenofovir-containing (16/678) ddI-containing (16/365) 2.7% (2.7-2.8%) 2.9% (2.4 - 3.4%) 2.4% (1.0 - 4.9%) 3.0% (1.8 – 4.6%) 3.1% (2.5 - 3.7%) 2.9% (2.3 - 3.5%) 2.5% (1.5 – 3.9%) 2.2% (0.8 - 4.7%) 3.4% (2.4 – 4.7%) 2.2% (1.3 – 3.5%) 2.3% (1.4 – 3.5%) 1.7% (0.7 – 3.3%) 2.4% (1.4 – 3.8%) 4.4% (2.5 – 7.0%) HIV negative but exposed children following in utero exposure to ARVs Clinically symptomatic mitochondrial dysfunction – rare 0.3% - 3 per 1,000 – very rarely (0.07% - 7 per 10,000) can be fatal Mild, clinically asymptomatic, but persistent hematologic abnormalities – anaemia, neutropenia Transient elevations in lactic acid – common with in utero exposure – usually asymptomatic – resolve within months ARV toxicities in treated children similar spectrum to adults Of particular importance in children: Metabolic abnormalities – hyperlipidaemia – glucose intolerance Fat redistribution Bone density & growth