NEUTRINO MASS a long wait for a little weight STUART FREEDMAN MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM BERKELEY, JAN 11, 2014 Hamish Robertson, University of Washington.

Download Report

Transcript NEUTRINO MASS a long wait for a little weight STUART FREEDMAN MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM BERKELEY, JAN 11, 2014 Hamish Robertson, University of Washington.

NEUTRINO MASS
a long wait for a little weight
STUART FREEDMAN MEMORIAL SYMPOSIUM
BERKELEY, JAN 11, 2014
Hamish Robertson, University of Washington
Neutrinos oscillate,
have mass
SNO
KamLAND
Super-Kamiokande
2
What is the neutrino
mass scale?
Particle Physics
Cosmology
NEUTRINO MASS FROM BETA
SPECTRA
With flavor mixing:
mixing
from oscillations
neutrino masses
mass scale
4
MASS LIMITS FROM TRITIUM
5
Hamish Robertson, Stuart Freedman, Tom Bowles, Carol Bowles,
Karl-Erik Bergkvist. Erice 1980. (from Tom)
6
Tom Bowles, Carol Bowles, Stuart Freedman, Hamish Robertson,
Erice 1980. (from Tom)
7
Magnetic spectrometers
showed no kink. But they had
shape correction factors.
"Contrary to intuition, a null
result is not inherently more
reliable than a positive one.”
J.J. Simpson
Grabowski spectrometer
8
CURRENT STATUS:
Mainz: solid T2, MAC-E filter
C. Kraus et al., Eur. Phys. J. C40, 447 (2005)
Troitsk: gaseous T2, MAC-E filter
V. Aseev et al., PRD 84 (2011) 112003
Together:…
mv < 1.8 eV
(95% CL)
9
MASS AND MIXING
PARAMETERS
Oscillation
m212
7.54+0.21-0.21 x 10-5 eV2
m322|
2.42+0.12-0.11 x 10-3 eV2
mi
> 0.055 eV (90% CL)
12
34.1+0.9-0.9 deg
23
39.2+1.8-1.8 deg
13
9.1+0.6-0.7 deg
sin213
0.025+.003-.003
Kinematic
< 5.4 eV (95% CL)*
Marginalized 1-D 1- uncertainties.
*C. Kraus et al., Eur. Phys. J. C40, 447 (2005); V. Aseev et al. PRD 84 (2011) 112003.
Other refs, see Fogli et al. 1205.5254
10
At Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
unique facility for closed T2 cycle:
Tritium Laboratory Karlsruhe
KATRIN
TLK
A direct, modelindependent, kinematic
method, based on β decay
of tritium.
~ 75 m long with 40 s.c. solenoids
11
First measurement,
UIE = 700V, electron
gun source.
July 12, 2013.
~0.4 eV
12
Measuring something
and getting it wrong?
13
A WINDOW TO WORK IN
Molecular excitations
Energy loss
14
KATRIN’S UNCERTAINTY
BUDGET
2
σ(mv ) 0
0.01 eV2
Statistical
Final-state spectrum
T- ions in T2 gas
Unfolding energy loss
Column density
Background slope
HV variation
Potential variation in source
B-field variation in source
Elastic scattering in T2 gas
σ(mv2)total= 0.025 eV2
mv< 0.2 eV (90 % CL)
15
WHAT IS THE BRANCHING RATIO FOR
T2 → 3HeT+?
Source
TH
T2
Experiment
Theory
Snell
Wexler
0.932
±
0.019
0.895
±
0.011
---
---
0.945
±
0.006
0.36
Need a test of the final-state
theory for KATRIN and Project 8
Tritium Recoil-Ion Mass
Spectrometer (TRIMS)
time of flight (s)
´10-6
Mass 3
1
0.9
10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
measured ion energy (keV)
Mass 6
5
0.8
0.7
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0
MASS
RANGE
ACCESSIBLE
KATRIN
starting
2016
Present
Lab Limit
1.8 eV
K. Abazajian, CF5 Summary
18
LEPTONS
TeV
QUARKS
t
τ
GeV
c
μ
MeV
s
d
u
e
keV
eV
νh
meV
νm
νl
??
b
MASS
RANGE
ACCESSIBLE
KATRIN
starting
2016
Present
Lab Limit
1.8 eV
THE LAST ORDER OF
MAGNITUDE
If the mass is below 0.2 eV, how can we measure it?
KATRIN may be the largest such experiment possible.
σ(mv)2 ~
0.38 eV2
Size of experiment now:
Diameter 10 m.
Next diameter: 300 m!
Source T2 column
density near max
Rovibrational
states of THe+,
HHe+ molecule
CYCLOTRON RADIATION
FROM TRITIUM BETA DECAY
(B. Monreal and J.
Formaggio, PRD
80:051301, 2009)
Radiated power ~ 1 fW
25.5-GHz waveguide cell
Working on the UW prototype
SIGNAL IS A RISING “CHIRP” IN
FREQUENCY
PROJECT 8: A PHASED APPROACH
PROJECT 8 SENSITIVITY
25
NEUTRINO MASS LIMITS FROM BETA DECAY
NEUTRINO MASS: SOME MILESTONES
Construction
Running
KATRIN:
Project 8:
Proof concept
Prototype
Phase I
Planck:
Analysis 2
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
27
Stuart Freedman, Steve Elliott, Hamish Robertson. Spanish coast
1992. Photo by John Wilkerson.
28
29
CAPTURE OF RELIC NEUTRINOS
PTOLEMY project
30
CAPTURE OF RELIC NEUTRINOS
PTOLEMY project
n e + 3H ® 3He + e
31
PTOLEMY Experimental Layout
Tritium Source Disk
(Surface Deposition)
High Field Solenoid
Low Field
Region
Long High Uniformity
Solenoid (~2T)
~50-150eV
below
Endpoint
E0+30kV
E0-18.4keV
E0
e-
Accelerating MAC-E filter
Accelerating
(De-accelerating
Potential
Potential
Potential)
Cryogenic
Calorimeter
(~0.1eV)
0-1keV
(~150eV)
RF Tracking
(38-46 GHz)
Time-of-Flight
(De-accelerating
Potential)
32
PTOLEMY SUMMARY
100 g of tritium (1 MCi) on 12-m diameter disk.
Relic capture rate ~ 10/year without local clustering.
Also presumably able to measure mass, active and sterile.
Transition-edge sensor array to provide basic 0.1-eV
resolution.
Tagging with RF cyclotron radiation a la Project 8.
Necessary to understand quantum effects of binding of T2
on surface.
33
INPUTS
1. Present laboratory limit 1.8 eV (90% CL) from Mainz and
Troitsk experiments on tritium
2. KATRIN experiment under construction.
3. Project 8 in proof-of-concept phase.
4. Cosmological inputs driven by Planck, SPT, ACT, Sloan
…
34
FIRST PLANCK ANALYSIS (MARCH 2013)
Planck XVI
WP = WMAP Polarization data
AL = weak lensing parameter
τ = optical depth at recombination
“…Planck lensing likelihood favours
larger Σm than the temperature power spectrum.”
CYCLOTRON RADIATION
FROM TRITIUM BETA DECAY
25.5-GHz waveguide cell
(B. Monreal and J.
Formaggio, PRD
80:051301, 2009)
NEUTRINOLESS DOUBLE
BETA DECAY
Depends on mv but not a
`direct’ measurement
1 sigma
W. Rodejohann, 1206.2560
ELECTRON CAPTURE HOLMIUM EXPT (ECHO)
187
J.F. Wilkerson
38
ELECTRON CAPTURE HOLMIUM EXPT (ECHO)
187
J.F. Wilkerson
39
NEUTRINO MASS PHYSICS
IMPACT
40
SUMMARY
Direct mass measurements are largely model independent:
• Majorana or Dirac
• No nuclear matrix elements
• No complex phases
• No cosmological degrees of freedom
One experiment in construction (KATRIN); 2015 start.
Three experiments in R&D (Project 8, ECHo, PTOLEMY)
41