Who will do the work? A whole system approach to workforce planning Dr Paul Forte The Balance of Care Group.
Download ReportTranscript Who will do the work? A whole system approach to workforce planning Dr Paul Forte The Balance of Care Group.
Who will do the work? A whole system approach to workforce planning Dr Paul Forte The Balance of Care Group The Issue • There are pressures to: – – – – – Maximise health and social care resource efficiency Innovate with new care pathways and technologies Work across organisations Provide high quality care Offer patient choice and carer support • This requires analysis of: – types of patients and their needs – implications for number and type of care staff required ol la ps e/ Fa ll Pa in Tr S R ea h tm ort eha b en of Br t / C on Inve eat h fu st si i on gat D ia io /D rrh em n oe en a/ t N au Inf ia se ec ti a/ Vo on m W itin ea g kn e H ea ss da ch e O th er C Number of patients Who are the patients? Admission reason (n = 479) 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Community Addenbrookes Alternatives to acute care on day of survey Preferred Alternatives for Selected Patients (Acute = 107, Community = 67) 100 90 80 No of Patients 70 60 50 Acute 40 Community 30 20 10 0 Home based care Mental Health Non-acute Bed Care - no rehab Rehab Bed Other Potential Changes in Care Location Community Care 48 46 35 Acute Hospital Community Hospitals 15 16 Care Homes Community care workforce implications – by dependency Weekly Input per Care Package Input required to meet demand previously met in hospitals 19 12 10 41 Additional WTE to meet additional demand Additional WTE introduced since survey date Dependency Level High Medium Low Therapy Nursing Care Assistants Hours per week Visits per week Hours per week 7 7 21 3 3 10.5 1 3 High Medium Low Total per week Capacity/WTE p.w. WTE 133 36 10 179 25 7.2 133 36 0 169 40 4.2 399 126 30 555 30 18.5 New services WTE 13.8 5.1 n/a Implicaciones de la mano de obra asistencial-por dependencia Weekly Input per Care Package Input required to meet demand previously met in hospitals 19 12 10 41 Additional WTE to meet additional demand Additional WTE introduced since survey date Dependency Level High Medium Low Therapy Nursing Care Assistants Hours per week Visits per week Hours per week 7 7 21 3 3 10.5 1 3 High Medium Low Total per week Capacity/WTE p.w. WTE 133 36 10 179 25 7.2 133 36 0 169 40 4.2 399 126 30 555 30 18.5 New services WTE 13.8 5.1 n/a By staff grade and location Grade Senior 1 Senior 2 Assistant Clerical Total Day Community Current Outpatient Hospital Inpatient Addition 0.5 0.5 0.62 0.31 1.5 1.5 0.83 1 0.5 0.22 0.78 2.22 2.78 0.83 1.62 0.81 Total 1.93 3.83 1.5 1 8.26 Potential consequences • Importance of better - and more creative local ‘population management’ in primary care • Community-based services could broaden scope to provide extended rehabilitation for many patients • Significant ramifications for staff recruitment, training and location Future care trends • More ‘active rehabilitation’ in the community: hospitals, care homes, clients’ own homes • Blurring of boundary between health and social care environments • More flexibility and devolution of tasks within and between care professions • More active ‘upstream’ management – chronic disease management – risk management of frail elderly in the community – health promotion A whole system approach • Symbiotic relationship between acute and community services, and between health and social care • Understanding the potential for alternatives to acute hospital capacity is crucial for workforce planning • Bed usage surveys provide a local picture and data for modelling potential future workforce requirements