Accreditation Update Curriculum Coordinators – April 10, 2015 Bill Bagshaw Assistant Director Teacher Licensure, Accreditation & Evaluation.
Download ReportTranscript Accreditation Update Curriculum Coordinators – April 10, 2015 Bill Bagshaw Assistant Director Teacher Licensure, Accreditation & Evaluation.
Accreditation Update Curriculum Coordinators – April 10, 2015 Bill Bagshaw Assistant Director Teacher Licensure, Accreditation & Evaluation 2015-2016 Accreditation All schools will maintain their current accreditation status for the 2015-2016 school year. Schools must complete QPA Quality Criteria Collection by June 30, 2015. What Should We Do Right Now? 1. Familiarize all staff with State Board’s definition of College and Career Ready, including the use of the ACTE (Academic, Cognitive, Technical, Employability) acronym. 2. Familiarize all staff with the Rose Capacities. What Should We Do Right Now? 3. Leadership begin review of the four rubrics (Rs) with calibration (IRA) in mind. 4. Familiarize all staff with the four rubrics – have them reflect on what they already do in support of CCR, ACTE, Rose Capacities, and the four rubric areas. What Should We Do Right Now? 5. When discussing data, address its relationship (and possible use as growth evidence) to CCR, ACTE, Rose Capacities, and the four rubric areas. What Should We Do Right Now? 7. Start using the four “R” rubrics as part of your needs assessments in planning for 2015-2016. 8. Relate strategic/action plans and goals to the components of the four rubrics. 9. Identify existing ACTE and 5R data points for possible use as indicators of goal and growth achievement. New Model Adoption Timeline June 2015 November 2015 December 2015 Jan – June 2016 July 2016 June 2017 June 2018 Submit revisions for legal review State Board ‘Receive Item’ State Board ‘Action Item’ Prepare field for implementation First cycle begins for all districts Group 1 districts receive official ratings Group 2 districts receive official ratings New Model Accreditation Ratings The following ratings will be used in conjunction with the new model: Accredited Accredited – Conditional Not Accredited New Model Non-negotiables Districts will meet all licensure, fiscal/accounting, mentoring, IDEA, and ESI statutes/regulations in order to be considered for an accreditation rating other than “not accredited.” New Model Other Foundational Requirements STRUCTURES MUST BE IN PLACE TO ADDRESS: 1. Compliance with statutes/regs 2. Participation in school improvement/accreditation 3. Diversity and equity in education 4. Family and community engagement 5. CCR/Rose Capacities 6. Social-emotional development of all students New Model Foundational Requirements With 100% of “Other Foundational Requirements” met, district can then be considered for rating as high as “Accredited.” Individual foundational requirements can be waived by the commissioner. New Model Foundational Requirements Individual foundational requirements can be waived by the commissioner. New Model – Process • District meets with Outside Validation Team (can be virtual) during Year One. • District meets with OVT Chair (can be virtual) during Year Three. • District hosts Outside Validation Team (cannot be virtual) for formal accreditation visit in Year Five. New Model – Process Year One Needs assessments (buildings and district) Goal area selection (District selects 2 of the Rs.) Meeting with Outside Validation Team (can be virtual) Year Two Development of goals and action plans (buildings) Development of leadership goals and action plans (district) Meeting with OVT Chair (can be virtual) Years Three-Four Implementation of action plans Year Five Post-implementation analysis OVT formal accreditation visit Application for accreditation rating