Transcript Standard Missile 6 Cooperative Earned Value Program Management Kirk Johnson (IWS 3A SM PM) Tim Lardy (RMS SM6 PM) 1 June 2009 Copyright © 2009 Raytheon Company.

Standard Missile 6
Cooperative Earned
Value Program
Management
Kirk Johnson (IWS 3A SM PM)
Tim Lardy (RMS SM6 PM)
1 June 2009
Copyright © 2009 Raytheon Company. All rights reserved.
Customer Success Is Our Mission is a registered trademark of Raytheon Company.
SM-6 Program Summary
Design
Program Plan
• Milestone B completed 15 Jun ‘04
Guidance Section Elements
AMRAAM
Electronics Stack
Transmitter
Battery/ECU Power
STANDARD
Interface Computer
Stable Platform
Plate 3A Two Way Data Link
GPS / IMU Growth Allocation
New SM Size Antenna, Mission
Computer
Modify FRU For Semi-active
• Contract Award 03 Sep ‘04
• SRR/SFR Dec ‘04 – SFR Completed 2 Months Early
• IBR Feb 05
• PDR/Gate 7: Jun ‘05 – Completed 2 Months Early
Common
Common Factory
Factory For
For
AMRAAM
-6
SM
AMRAAM &
& SMSM-6
Guidance
Guidance Sections
Sections
• DRR/Gate 8: Mar ‘06 – Completed 4 Months Early
• WSMR Testing: ‘07-’09 – Direct Hit on first 2 guided
flights
• DT/OT FY10
STANDARD Missile Propulsion Stack, Airframe, Warhead/TDD, Radome
• IOC planned in FY10
Capability
• Provides Area Defense
• Capable of Over-The-Horizon
Engagements
• Enabler for Integrated Fire Control
• Capable against Overland Cruise Missile
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
Overview – May ‘08
•
•
•
•
80% Complete ITD CPI: .98, ITD SPI: 0.99
GTV 1 June 08 – Direct Hit
GTV 2 Sept 08 – Direct Hit
CTV 29 Jan 09 – Did not launch
 Retest Aug 09
• GTV 3 scheduled for Nov 09
• First DT/OT missile hardware in work for
delivery this fall
11/6/2015
Page 2
Acquisition/Cultural Changes
Its Not All Rocket Science
LEGACY
ACQUISITION
MODEL






Detailed Statement of Work
Many Specifications
Separate Seeker Developments
Subjective Award Fee
Separate Factories
Customer/Contractor
Relationship
STREAMLINED
ACQUISITION
MODEL
5 Page Statement of Objectives
Single Msl Performance Specification
Common Active Seeker Family
Results-Oriented Objective Award Fee
Common Factories, Volume Production
ToPP- Total Performance Partnering
Acquisition Philosophy Must Be As Innovative As Technical Solution
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
11/6/2015
Page 3
Acquisition/Cultural Changes
Its Not All Rocket Science
Culture / Communication
– High Priority From the Beginning
– Develop a Consistent Focused Team Intent on Mission of Delivering
Capability
– Small, Engaged, Informed Govt Teaming inside Contractor IPTs
– Counterparts Identified and Maintained throughout phase
– Web Based Information Sharing System (WISDM)
– Combined Contractor/Government Reviews
 Business, technical, programmatic
– Arbinger Training
– Raytheon Six Sigma
New Culture Requires Partnership Between Team Members
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
11/6/2015
Page 4
Cooperative Successes

Government and contractor teams participated in Alpha contracting
process to generate technical scope, schedule & cost baseline for
the program
– Required alignment of technical objectives, schedule and budget realities
– Scope agreements hammered out early in the baselining process
– Schedule development took into account the possibility of test failures and
resulted in an executable program plan




Successful IBR in Feb 2005
– Baseline is still in effect today (no re-baselines since contract start)
RMS provides an EV “quick look” to USN cost team 10 days after
month end to facilitate timely & objective analysis
– Data provided in USN preferred WINSIGHT format
Government (USN and DCMA) participates in RMS monthly Earned
Value reviews
– Diligent participation by execution team and management
SM6 EVMS DCMA COE Audit Results
– Kudos received from both DCMA audit teams on SM6 use of Earned Value
– SM6 management team received an RMS excellence award for performance
during 2006 EV audit
Cooperation & Management Focus Drove Success
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
11/6/2015
Page 5
Program EVM “Early Warning”Benefits
• Principle benefit of EVM during program execution phase is
providing an early warning for future problems
– Generated “Watch Account” metric to be able to track Control Account
Performance to EAC
 CAM’s were spending to EAC but it was not clear if they were actually achieving
the performance necessary to meet EAC
 New metric tracks actual performance to promised performance
– Allocated MR to antenna supplier to build additional tooling to improve
delivery schedule and mitigate risk #183
 Antenna delivery schedule from supplier was predicted to drive build of POM
GS’s
 Supplier indicated that additional tooling would improve cycle times and reduce
schedule pressure
 Antennas are no longer the critical path for GS build
– MBIT
 Performance metrics (cost/schedule variance, EAC, TCPI, etc.) were showing
that the team was starting to struggle
 Program worked with functional department to bring in new resources and make
surgical personnel changes
 Team is back on track, performance has improved & product will be delivered in
time to support production
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
11/6/2015
Page 6
SM-6 Managing Using EV
Daily
Daily Standup Meetings
Status of Pacing Items
(Chaired by PM and CE)
Weekly
Schedule Updates
Critical Path Reviews
(Chaired by PM and Planner)
Bi-Monthly
Schedule/Critical Path Reviews
(Chaired by PM and Planner)
Monthly
Mangement Reviews
Risk/Opportunity Reviews
(Chaired by PM)
(Chaired by CE)
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
11/6/2015
Page 7
SM-6 Monthly Management Metrics Sampling
Top Ten Cost/Schedule Drivers

-256. 7 -335. 7
0.000 -335. 7
91. 13
C ohen Am y


-112. 8 -252. 0
0.709 -252. 0
33. 16 22, 445. 3 21, 686. 1
MK 698 GMTS Upg R andall R obert H 

146.6 -233. 1
5.964 -233. 1
82. 06
3,356.3
5
A2C3N
MK 45 F ac t ory
Graf f am Ray


10. 3 -186. 7
1.060 -186. 7
57. 01
A4A23M1
Spac e Stabilize
Albrecht Ken


3,726.7
-500.04,289.4
6
10. 7 -138. 9
1.201 -138. 9
94. 09
1,158.2
1,164.8
7
A7A2A
GTV1 I nt egrat io
Adam s , Charlie


28. 4 -137. 4
1.453 -137. 4
23. 65
1,811.4
1,678.5
Antenna Prot ot y
Albrecht Ken


-67.4 -117. 6
0.801 -117. 6
84. 98
-400.02,897.9
2,487.0
Target Detec tio
Abraham , Lisa


-89.3 -103. 7
0.162 -103. 7
56. 78
3,428.3
3,742.2
10
A4A42M1
Sem i-Ac tiv e F RU
Albrecht Ken


-0. 8
-85.2
0.942
-85.2
62. 99
890.2
1,091.8
11
G1D 2
AU R BIT Test er
R andall R obert H 

100.8
-54.6
1.165
-54.6
58. 40
4,945.1
2,570.4
2,516.3
10. 02
2,556.5
2,409.6
84. 98
2,487.0
0.672
35. 48
7,989.6
-42.9
-42.9
1.05
1
6000
1.200
1.100
0.95
5000
0.9
Jan-06
Feb-06
Mar-06
Apr-06
May-06
Jun-06
Jul-06
Aug-06
Sep-06
Oct-06
EAC Watch Accounts
0.800
DD
45
Fa
cto
ry
Sh
ro
ud
)
DD
e
(T
Pro
to
ty
pe
20
3400
3337
3325
0.700
3000
0.600
10
2
3300
0
3
3268
3200
-10
0.500
2000
0.400
0.300
Simulation, Algorithms & Performance - C1F1
1000
0.200
3100
-20
-22
Now looking as tasks that did not meet their baseline dates.
3000
-30
-35
2900
-40
-42
-50
2800
-50
-49
ITD Actuals/ITD Forecast
$1,400.0
9,000.0
$1,200.0
$1,000.0
$833.8
6,000.0
$800.0
$720.7
$680.4
$600.0
$558.6
3,000.0
Total LRE $14,806.7K
Q109EAC $15,017.3K
3-Mth CPI =
2.70
TCPI 1Q09eac
1.08
0.0
CPI
B/L Plan
1.08
1.09
1.09
May-09
Jun-09
1.08
1.03
1.01
.98
3738.8
3634.3
3461.3
Cum Actual
Delta to Baseline Plan
9
09
ul-
22
-A
ug
-0
9
Future Completes
25
-J
Late and Critical to GTV-3
Critical Paths 1-5 to
CPLI (FCA): 1.12
Program Milestone - Flight Test (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
4/25/09
2008
December
2009
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
(14517) G/S - Build G/S (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(14518) G/S - Deliver G/S to Integration (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(14269) G/S - Integrate (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(14519) G/S - Vibe/Skin/Leak/Fill/Weight CG (ADSAM4/CTV-1
(15424) SIT - AUR Kit Complete (G/S, TDD, PCT, IFTS, ET,
(15425) SIT - Assemble Flight Round (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(21651) SIT - Test Readiness Review (TRR) ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(15428) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round Test EAT - Tucso
(21652) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round EAT Data Review
(15430) SIT - Consent to Ship (Gate 9) from Tucson to WSM
(15431) SIT - All ADSAM4/CTV-1a AUR Kit Items Received at
(15432) SIT - Assemble ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round with or
(21653) SIT - TRR for ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round I and T
(15436) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round I and T (WSMR)
(20142) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Dress Rehearsal and Flight Te
(15438) SIT - MRR (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(15372) SIT - CTV-1 Flight Test
$200.0
Jul-09
1.10
3919.9
Forecast Finish
-0
0.614 0.618 0.646 0.571 0.409 0.517 0.462 0.527 0.548 0.385 0.569 0.486
9
Monthly Hit Index
un
BEI
-80
23
-M
5201
9
5129
9
5057
pr
-0
4992
25
-A
4930
9
4837
-0
4759
ar
-0
4672
28
-M
4579
eb
4474
21
-F
4392
9
4261
0.983 0.970 0.972 0.968 0.961 0.957 0.958 0.962 0.970 0.974 0.981 0.983
an
-0
Cum Sched. to Complete by Status Date
-70
2500
24
-J
5113
8
5032
-0
4927
ec
4841
27
-D
4744
8
4635
-0
4552
ov
4492
22
-N
4433
08
4347
ct-
4262
2600
$0.0
Jan-09 ITD Actuals Feb-09 ITD Actuals Mar-09 ITD Actuals Apr-09 ITD Actuals
TCPI
$400.0
4189
Cum Completed by Status Date
0.000
25
-O
$1,600.0
11,489.9
Expected - Achieved Performance Delta
$1,800.0
12,000.0
Dec
May
Nov 08
Jan 09 Feb 09 Mar 09 Apr 09
Jun 09 Jul 09 Aug 09 Sep 09 Oct 09
08
09
-60
The average number of tasks completed per month is 59
and 15 tasks were completed this month
-64
0
BCWR
2700
27
-J
0.100
$2,000.0
ay
-0
August '10 Completion
15,000.0
Delta to Baseline Plan/Future Completes
4000
Tasks Completed
Dec-05
GTV-3 Tasks / All Teams
3500
0.8
Nov-05
Critical Path
1.000
0.900
Task Finishes
0.85
Material ITD CPI
Labor ITD CPI
Material ITD SPI
Labor ITD SPI
ev
ic
pm
2,897.9
7,755.6
A4
A2
3M
Schedule EV Baseline Execution Indices (BEI) as of April 09
K
0.801 -117. 6
-64.3
A2
DT
-67.4 -117. 6

A2
C3
R-M


De
ve
lo

F ritz Bill
U
3,853.4
Albrecht Ken
D
3,146.5
FR
94. 02
-40.2
on
0.198
-40.2
e
-69.1
tiv

i-A
c
3,742.2

Sm it h Rex
1Se
m
3,428.3
A4
A4
2M
56. 78
en
t
0.0 686. 1
33. 16 22, 445. 3 21,
0.162 -103. 7
Pro
to
ty
pe
0.709 -252. 0
-89.3 -103. 7
a rg
et
De
te
cti
-112. 8 -252. 0

en
t


A4
B1
4-T
Antenna Prot ot y
BI T (N RE)
38. 00
-32.2

Te
st
De
ve
lo
pm
A4A21MN
A4C21N
-45.2
0.000

NAn
te
nn
a
10
0.000
-32.2

C ohen Am y
A4
A2
1M
9
Nov-06
Month
-45.2
-119. 7
C ohen Am y
Badillo I v eli se
Abraham , Lisa
Fa
cto
ry
Miss ion C om pute
-128. 9
1,699.7
Pro
to
ty
pe
A4A5AH
1,883.3-100.0
2,062.6
m
8
1,541.5
46. 17
Pla
tfo
r
Target Detec tio
90. 82
-17.0
bil
ize
d
C SCI D ev elopm en
A4B14
0.0
0.108
Sta
Miss ile Lev el E
A4B11
7
0.000
-17.0
Ac
ce
pta
nc
e
C SCI I nt egrat io
A7A7
6
0.0
-137. 8
&
A4B15
5
LRE
-229. 9
Up
gra
de
4

45

TS

Graf f am Ray
K
Parry , Jam es
TDD SH ROU D
9,044.1 10, 480. 3
en
t
Aerody nam ic Ana
A2D
91. 13
pm
C 1F 2
3
0.000 -335. 7
ev
e lo
2
4,909.1
-200.0
-256. 7 -335. 7
In
te
g ra
tio
n
Oct -06

BAC
1
Sep-06
H unter Scot t
% Comp
A7
A2
A-G
TV
Aug-06
SW ES/C IL/ HI L De
CvCur
G
M
Jul-06
C 1G2
SpiCur
SC
ID
Jun-06
1
CvCur
K
May-06
SvCurCvCur SvCur
-300.0
1-M
Apr-06
CAM
$$
A4A21MN
A4B14
Desc
Oct-06
Sep-06
Aug-06
2,997.2
G
1D
Mar-06
LRE
-600.0
IL
Jan-06
1.1
Feb-06
BAC
9,044.1 10, 480. 3
/H
0.88
% Comp
IL
1.15
0.92
CvCur
8
WBS
ITD LABOR and MATERIAL CPI/SPI
SpiCur
/C
0.96
CvCur
9
1
SPI
SvCurCvCur SvCur
A4
B1
1-C
CPI
H unter Scot t
C SCI D ev elopm en
G1D 1
W
ES
Actuals
1.04
SW ES/C IL/ HI L De
A4B11
3
C1
G
2-S
1.08
CAM
C 1G2
2
A2
C3
N-M
WBS
Top 10 CM Cost Drivers
Desc
1
1Sp
ac
e
CPI/SPI Trend
1.12
69
8
CPI/SPI Trend Data
8/20
Program Milestone - Flight Test (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
8/28
ITD Actuals
BCWP - (Actuals * TCPIeac)
LRE * TCPIeac
Achieved Perf
ITD LRE
1st Qtr '09 EAC
(12860) AUR - Assemble IFTS (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(12861) AUR - IFTS Delivered (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(11373) G/S - SE Integration - ADSAM4/CTV-1a
(21654) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Flight Round I and T Data Rev
(20143) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a Permit to Ship (PTS)
(15437) SIT - MCP (ADSAM4/CTV-1a)
(20141) SIT - ADSAM4/CTV-1a WSMR DS/Range Intg. (IOM-2.2b
Path 1
6d
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
Path 2
7d
Path 3
8d
Path 4
8d
Path 5
14 d
11/6/2015
Progress
Risk
Page 8
Summary

Diligent application of management
processes (EV) produce significant
benefits to the war fighter
– Stable technical baseline - no scope creep
– Stable funding requirements
– Predictable Performance
– All major program milestones met on time
– 2 guided flights, 2 direct hits
On Time, On Budget Delivery of Warfighter Capability
11/6/2015
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
Page 9
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
11/6/2015
Page 10
Non-technical data per ITAR 120.10(5)
11/6/2015
Page 11