Asset Management Data & Systems Jim Wilkin Asset Management at Bayside • Asset management a corporate function • Asset Management group • Centralised asset management.
Download ReportTranscript Asset Management Data & Systems Jim Wilkin Asset Management at Bayside • Asset management a corporate function • Asset Management group • Centralised asset management.
Asset Management Data & Systems Jim Wilkin Asset Management at Bayside • Asset management a corporate function • Asset Management group • Centralised asset management database, Asset Infrastructure Management System (AIM) • AIM links to financial reporting and has ability to link to EDMS, GIS and CSR All maintenance is carried out by external service providers: • Citywide looks after our Roads, Footpaths, Drains, Parks and Trees • UMS (Urban Maintenance Systems) maintains Council Building Assets FACILITIES MAINTENANCE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE MAINTENANCE AIM PARKS MAINTENANCE TREES MAINTENANCE Recording through mobile computing What is the challenge ? • Each service provider uses a different system to the Corporate Asset Information Management System (AIM) • Integration of systems Service providers systems • Citywide use TRAX • UMS have WSM WSM The one thing that each of these systems have in common with the Bayside AIM system is the Asset ID, which is consistent. This ID becomes the key in sending information back to the AIM system GIS integration • All Bayside Council Assets have been located in GIS • The AIM system can be linked to GIS, the CSR system and also the EDMS “TRIM” Benefits of a corporate system • Centralised information • Each asset can have stored actual invoicing costs, condition data, inspections, attribute data, floor plans, lease agreements, etc • Asset financial information can be capitalised seamlessly into the Capital Value Register Building condition data Buildings have been itemised by element (ie. air system, roof, doors, floors etc) and have been condition assessed individually using the 0-10 Moloney rating system Life cycle renewal planning Condition audits and Life cycle costing audits undertaken by the service provider are audited by Council and captured in AIM + Renewal modelling based on LOS = Long term capital renewal program linked to Council Long Term Financial Plan and Council Plan Defects and programmed maintenance • In addition we carry out defect inspections using mobile computing • Defects outside intervention levels are repaired within the specified contract timeframes • From defect inspections, AIM produces maintenance programs Bayside vision for the future • Knowing everything about our assets • Maintaining assets to meet community needs • Long term renewal planning that is sustainable • Service driven asset management plans Case Study – Pavilion Renewal Strategy Peter Drummy, CT Management • Peter presents an example of how Bayside is moving forward in establishing a Pavilion Renewal Strategy (PRS) • PRS uses information from AIM, renewal modelling and service strategies • PRS informs the Asset Management Plan and long term program for delivery Peter Drummy Project Objective – Develop Long Term Service Plan for Pavilions Key Project Steps 1. Establish Cross Functional PRT 2. Develop pavilion categories 3. Develop “standards” for each category: 1. Regional 2. District 3. Local 4. Jointly assess each pavilion against standards to identify: 1. Upgrade 2. Renewal (fit out related) Assessment against Required Standards Individual Pavilion Summary 1 Component Pavilion Access Castlefield Reserve Pavilion Local Proposed Works Priority RenewalUpgrade ~ Cost RenewalRequirements Upgrade Access & egress to be DDA Modify door entry. High 1,200 1,200 Priority compliant Sum Sum CostFuture Sumworks subject to DDA audit Multipurpose/ Change Provide Multi- purpose space Allow 25m2 expansion to meet AFL needs Medium 100,000 100,000 Rooms Space within some of current undercover High $31,000 $54,200 $85,200 area Toilets and Showers Provide shared showers and within expansion N/A 0 (for Changerooms) toilets. Min. of 1 toilet and Low $1,500 shower per change$1,500 room. Public Toilets (Internal Provide min. 1 internal all abilities Refurbish existing toilets + High 25,000 47,000 72,000 & External) Build new toilet multi use DDA. Medium toilet $113,000 $113,000 1 External DDA compliant OfficialsGrand Change Area Provide min. single cubicle with Modify existing area High 6,000 6,000 Total$31,000 $168,700 $199,700 change bench and basin Social/Meeting Room Within Multi Purpose Area N/A 0 Storage Requires additional storage Allow 4m2 additional area for Council Medium 13,000 13,000 Council equipment equipment Cleaners Store Provide secure storage cupboard Add in as part of toilet upgrade Renewal Low 1,500 1,500 Priority Upgrade Total Cost Kiosk/Kitchen Adequate 0 High $1,614,000N/A $3,084,400 $4,698,400 Waste Storage Area Provide secure external area for Build new enclosed area as per Bayside High 6,000 6,000 Medium $343,500 $1,031,000 $1,374,500 bins and recycling. standard Low $162,000N/A $944,000 $1,106,000 Shelter Maintain a shelter area(some may 0 be lost in providing enclosed Grand Total $2,119,500 $5,059,400 $7,178,900 gathering space) Summary All Pavilions Next Key Step – Validation with Council Renewal LT $ Plan 1. Model renewal for only Pavilions 2. Compare latest field results against model 3. Ensure renewal funding “matched” model & $ Plan Year No. 1 2 3 4 5 Asset Set Name 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Structure Long Life 0 22,250 50,713 83,143 117,742 0 0 0 0 0 15,387 22,865 36,523 51,036 63,660 37,077 60,605 93,731 104,636 106,443 262,362 439,864 803,139 964,199 939,154 Annual Total All Asset Sets 314,873 545,637 984,158 1,203,065 1,227,051 Less Allowance Pavilion Strategy 223,008 373,884 682,668 839,940 0 91,866 171,753 301,490 363,125 1,227,051 Structure Short Life Roof Structure Mechanical Services Building Fit Out Net Other Pavilion Renewal Conclusions • Cross Functional approach imperative – “ownership of outcomes” – (Rec, Finance, Asset Man and Build Mtce) • LT $ Plan for Pavilion Renewal “no surprises” • Pavilion standards needed to reflect community & sport needs • Council now has ability to compare/validate standards against cost