Computational Fluency Connections to MPS Math Programs & Foundational Experiences for Grouping and Ungrouping Math Alliance April 13, 2010 Beth Schefelker and DeAnn Huinker.

Download Report

Transcript Computational Fluency Connections to MPS Math Programs & Foundational Experiences for Grouping and Ungrouping Math Alliance April 13, 2010 Beth Schefelker and DeAnn Huinker.

Computational Fluency
Connections to MPS Math Programs
&
Foundational Experiences for
Grouping and Ungrouping
Math Alliance
April 13, 2010
Beth Schefelker and DeAnn Huinker
Computation Strategies from Students
Addition Strategies
•
•
•
•
Subtraction Strategies
•
Subtract each place
•
Add on the other
number in parts
Subtract the number
in parts
•
Use a nice number
and compensate
Add up from the
subtracted number
•
Change to an easier
equivalent problem
Use a nice number
then compensate
•
Change to an easier
equivalent problem
Add each place
from left to right
Homework: Subtraction Strategies
2–3 Minute Table Discussion
 Reflect on how the information in the article
helped you think further about fluency with
subtraction.
 Reflect on your own growing fluency with
addition and subtraction strategies.
How do MPS Math Programs
promote computational fluency?
WALT
We Are Learning To…
Connect computational fluency strategies for
addition and subtraction to current MPS
textbook programs.
We will know we are successful when…
We are able to apply and explain the
different strategies found in the programs, and
discuss their value for student learning.
Read, Try, Compare, Discuss
Split your table into two groups. One group
will read about algorithms in Everyday Math
and the other will read HM Math Expressions.
 As you read, make note of these ideas:
 Algorithms discussed
 Representations suggested
 Vocabulary used to develop the ideas

Textbook Programs:
Algorithms, Representations, & Vocabulary
1. Discuss these features with your small “math
program” group. Use sticky notes to write the
important examples in each area.
2. Discuss as a table group, with each math
program group presenting to each other.
Use the sticky notes to help explain the
nuances of each program.

Add examples of the algorithms to help
develop understanding.
Reflecting on your learning…

How are the programs similar? different?

In what ways would these strategies
support struggling learners?

How do they support our district learning
targets and descriptors?
Mathematically Desirable and Accessible
Methods for Computation


These more accessible methods fit
students’ thinking better, so they are easier
for students to understand and to explain.
Most are easier to do procedurally and
are less prone to errors than are the
Current Common methods.
--Fuson (2007, p. 77)
What might be some advantages of
New Groups Below method?
189
+ 157


1 1
346


New group is near the digit you record in
the answer space, so it is easier to see the
partial sum more easily.
You add the numbers you see in the problem
and have less to hold “in your mind.”
Students say the digit above changes the
problem; again must hold more in one’s mind.
Students confuse the digits above for
addition with the crossing out of top numbers
for subtraction, and later for multiplication.
--Fuson (2007, p. 81, 82)
Try It: 576 + 238= ?



Use the “New Groups Below” method to solve
the problem.
Consider how to explain this approach to
students with language that reflects the
quantities and not merely the digits.
A volunteer in your group talks through the
process using “quantity” language.
Learning Computation Strategies
Concrete &
Slow Informal
Methods
?
Jump to
the Standard
Algorithm
Students do not jump from “Concrete and Slow
Informal” methods to rote formal Current Common
methods as in traditional teaching but to methods
they can relate to visual supports and come to
explain as well as carry out. (Fuson, 2007, p. 73)
Fluency with Computation Strategies
Fluency includes being able to explain
and relate computational methods to a
visual or situational support.
--Fuson (2007, p. 77)
Visual and Verbal Supports:
Importance of Math Drawings & Explanations



It is important to link math drawings or other visual
support to the numeric method for each step.
It is such tight linking that enables the meanings
for the visual or contextual supports to become
attached to the notations and thus to take on those
meanings.
We found that moving rapidly to having students
make math drawings with their solution methods
was extremely powerful in supporting everyone.
--Fuson (2007, p. 79, 83)
Visual and Verbal Supports
Math
Drawings

Explain with
“quantity”
language
Students (and teachers) must use quantity
language (hundreds, tens, ones) when adding
tens or hundreds…. This helps the numerical
methods to take on these quantity meanings,
which will remain when students no longer need
to make the drawings.
--Fuson (2007, p. 83)
Show All Totals or Partial Sums: 189 + 157 = ?
Try It: 247+ 155= ?
Make a step-by-step proof drawing using the
“Show All Totals” or “Partial-Sums” method.
 Include both a math drawing and the numeric
notation.
 A new volunteer in your group talks through the
process using “quantity” language.

Ungroup First or Trade-First Subtraction


What are the key ideas in using this
method?
What might be some advantages of
using this method with students?
Try It: 432 – 276 = ?
Make a step-by-step proof drawing using the
“Ungroup First” or “Trade-First” method.
 Include both a math drawing and the numeric
notation.
 A new volunteer in your group talks through the
process using “quantity” language.

Student 4: “Dariah’s Method”
What is this student thinking?
Try It: 64 – 37 = ?
Solve this problem using the same
reasoning as in “Dariah’s Method.”
 Include both a math drawing
and the numeric notation.
 A new volunteer talks
through the reasoning
using quantity language.

Base-ten Number System: Place Value


Learning about whole number computation
must be closely linked to learning about the
base-ten number system
The heart of this work is relating the written
numeral to the quantity and to how that
quantity is composed and can be decomposed.
Teacher Note, Computational Fluency and Place Value, Investigations Grade K-5. TERC, 2007
Base Ten Blocks
Hundred (Flat)
Ten (Stick)
One (Unit)
The Place Value Mat
Hundreds
Tens
Ones
Race to 100







Two teams of two players each.
Goal: Get enough Tens and Ones to trade for a Flat worth 100.
One team rolls two number cubes, finds the sum of the numbers,
represent it with Ones, then puts it on their place value mat.
When a team gets 10 Ones or more, trade 10 Ones for 1Ten.
Teams take turns rolling, finding the sum, putting Ones on their
mats, and trading Ones for Tens.
As soon as a team gets blocks worth 100 or more, they make a
trade for 1 Hundred (Flat). The first team to do this wins.
Be ready to talk about what you did to get a Hundred (Flat).
Teacher’s Role: Ask Key Questions

What number is on your mat?

How far are you from 30? 50? (multiple of 10)

How far are you from 100?

What are you hoping to roll next and why?

What math are you learning from this?
Go for Broke
Two teams of two players each.
 Start with 1 hundred (flat), 2 tens (sticks/rods),
5 ones (units) on your mat.
 One team rolls two number cubes, finds the sum,
and removes that amount from their mat,
“ungrouping” as needed.
 The first team to “be broke” (has no more blocks
on their place value mat) wins.

Teacher’s Role: Ask Key Questions


What number is on your mat?
How much would you have on your mat if you
rolled 10? Rolled 5?

How far are you from 80? 50? (multiple of 10)

What are you hoping to roll next and why?

What math are you learning from this?
Computational Fluency

Flexibility
 Comfortable
with more than one approach.
 Chooses strategy appropriate for the numbers.

Efficiency
 Easily
carries out the strategy, uses intermediate results.
 Doesn’t get bogged down in too many steps or lose track
of the logic of the strategy.

Accuracy
 Can
judge the reasonableness of results.
 Has a clear way to record and keep track.
 Concerned about double-checking results.
Source: Russell, S.J. (2000). Developing computational fluency with
whole numbers. Teaching Children Mathematics, 7, 154 - 158.
Thinking Back on Your Learning

How has your definition of computational
fluency changed from when we first
conversation of class?
Thinking About Your Work…
 What is one goal you have for yourself
or a student related to improving
computational fluency?
Closing Thought . . . .




Computation should “make sense.”
Students should flexibly choose computation
methods appropriate to the numbers and context.
Traditional algorithms are “digit-oriented” and
“rigid” and rely on memorizing rules without
reasons, and can lead to common errors.
Alternative strategies are “number-oriented” and
“flexible” and rely on making sense of working
with numbers, and build confidence in students.
Homework



(a) Read “Math for Teachers” Textbook,
section 4.2 (p. 139-146).
(b) Problems for Section 4.2 (p. 148-149):
Complete Problems 1, 2, 3, & 12
(c) Problems for Section 4.2 (p. 149): Problem #14.
Complete parts (a) and (b).
This is the Equal Additions method for subtraction
commonly used in many countries in Europe and Latin
America, as well as Australia.